Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Conspiracy Nation Vol. 12 Num. 23
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 12 Num. 23
=======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
EVIDENCE OF KINSEY "SEX RESEARCH" FRAUD
=======================================
KINSEY, CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES: The Red Queen & The Grand Scheme
By Judith A. Reisman
The Institute For Media Education, Arlington, Va*
326 PAGES; soft cover; $24.95 US
KINSEY: ROCKEFELLER & THE NAZI DOCTORS
Reisman's latest research on the man who seduced America
Presents sinister material . . . .
"No man of our century may have contributed so much to the
public acceptance of his own private disordered imagination
and harmed America and all of its citizens as much as
Indiana University sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey" -- Dr.
Judith A. Reisman
KINSEY, CRIMES & CONSEQUENCES: The Red Queen & The Grand Scheme
By Judith A. Reisman . . . Reviewed by Kevin E. Abrams Alberta
& BC Reports, Canada, June 29, 1998
The 1960s sexual revolution was based on the most elaborate and
carefully crafted scientific fraud of this century, writes author
Judith Reisman. Early sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey, with his two
famous reports of just 50 years ago, seemingly legitimized both
profligacy and deviancy, and thus established "the sexual license
he [personally] espoused." *Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male*
(1948) and its female equivalent (1953) kicked off no-fault
divorce, the wife-swapping era, the gay rights movement,
classroom sex education, sex "therapy" as growth industry,
explicit imagery in the media and entertainment industry, and an
avalanche of pornography and obscenity.
Although Kinsey, was a sexual revolutionary, Dr. Reisman contends
he was falsely portrayed by Indiana University where he worked,
and the Rockefeller Foundation which funded him, as just a normal
American guy/husband/family man who simply 'discovered' that
'really' most American men commonly engaged in sexually aberrant
and outlaw behaviour. Kinsey's 'research' alleged that 10% of
American males were homosexual, that all of us were bisexual,
that children were sexual from birth and could engage in sexual
activity with adults without harm, plus a whole broad spectrum of
things taught today in our schools and practiced today in courts
of law as fact and as true... It was fraud then, it is fraud now
and it revolutionized this nation and turned us into Kinsey's
[psychological] clones."
His "Grand Scheme" was to eliminate normal families in favour of
selective breeding predicated upon racial and sexual eugenics,
Dr. Reisman charges, and his "scientific conclusions" were
concocted to advance it. The reference is to the Red Queen in
*Alice in Wonderland* who wanted the sentence (beheading) carried
out first and the verdict anounced afterwards.
Disturbing information about Kinsey's work and private life has
been accumulating since his death in 1956 at age 62. (The
official cause was pneumonia due to overwork, but his extensive
homosexual and sadmasochistic activities were likely
contributors.) Dr. Reisman revealed much of it in 1990, for
example, in *Kinsey, Sex and Fraud*. Even last years resolutely
non-condemnatory biography by fellow Indiana University scholar
James H. Jones---*Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life*
(Norton)---is replete with gruesomely shocking details.
*Kinsey: Crime and Consequences* cannot be described as non-
condemnatory. Its central figure, Dr. Reisman asserts, "fits the
classic definition of a sexual psychopath." Had the public known
that he and his male population were sexually abnormal, the
popular use of their data to change [our] law, education and
public policy would have come to a screeching halt..." But he
blackmailed into silence associates who knew about "his extensive
use of deviants, his large prison population or, worse, his
active child molesters."
Still, she thinks, his "findings" should have roused suspicion.
"When I first read Kinsey's research, I thought this man is not
reporting on America -- he's reporting on himself and then
projecting that onto the nation. Kinsey prostituted his own wife
Clara....into acts of sodomy with fellow 'researchers,' which
Kinsey filmed. He seduced his own students at Indiana University
-- male, not female, students. He devised sexual activities with
his 'co-workers,' who then became his co-authors. He
[personally] engaged in violent sadistic activity, in which he
harmed himself terribly...and appears to have died, frankly, as a
result of the trauma to his body."
But his famed reports were carefully phrased to obscure the fact
that words like "contacts," "partners" and "sex play" could
signify grown men sodomizing children. He was also both racist
and cautious about his colleagues, avoiding Jews, blacks and
moral traditionalists. Dr. Reisman quotes Kinsey co-author
Wardell Pomeroy, (Kinsey and The Institute for Sex Research,
Harper & Row 1972), on his hiring technique: "As usual...we took
his sexual history first...[Then] Kinsey put down his pen and
said, 'I don't think you want to work for us.' 'But I do,' the
researcher insisted. 'Well, Kinsey observed, 'you have just said
that premarital intercourse might lead to later difficulties in
marriage, that extramarital relations would break up a marriage,
that homosexuality is abnormal, and intercourse with animals is
ludicrous. Apparently you have all the answers. Why do you want
to do research?'"
Biographer Jones describes Kinsey as "one of the scholarly
eugenicists of pre-WW II" who favoured mass sterilization for the
lower classes and selective breeding for the "better classes."
Moreover, Judith Reisman emphasizes, the Rockefeller Foundation
was early interested in population control and in using the media
to popularize it. The Reece Committee, investigating U.S.
tax-exempt foundations in 1953-54, concluded that this
"plutocratic control" was accomplished by "funding the 'right'
university research by the 'right' researchers, then by funding
mass media dissemination of the 'right' science data to the
public..." Kinsey's numbers made him a perfect fit for anyone
eager to alter what he would call human "breeding patterns."
Dr. Reisman, a specialist in content analysis studies of written
and visual media, lost many family members in the Holocaust. In
that context she raises further sinister questions about Kinsey's
data. For instance, who was the "lone pedophile," the "elderly
gentleman," cited by Kinsey for his sexual molestation of 800
children? Who were "The Children of Table 34" and what became of
them? How did Kinsey's "technically trained" observers gain
access to the claimed 1,800 American children for illegal genital
experiments? "To this day," she observes, "the Kinsey Institute
and Indiana University have repeatedly... refused to reveal any
names of the subjects or the experimenters..." Nor has any one
of these children ever come forth, although the institute seems
an excellent target for lawsuits.
Even in the destitute 1930s, at the cited rate of a dollar a day,
she doubts that children as young as three months were obtainable
in such numbers around Bloomington, Indiana. She suggests an
ominous but credible alternative: a collaborative link between
Kinsey and Nazi Germany, then a police state where such
"experimentation" could have easily been conducted "as part of an
on-going collegial, cross-cultural, multinational, `fact-finding'
research project." She cites significant links, such as one
George Sylvester Viereck who worked for the German Embassy in
Washington D.C. Viereck established Nazi front groups, and is
known to have been a Kinsey correspondent. Furthermore, the
Rockefeller Foundation was simultaneously funding eugenics
projects in Berlin.
Kinsey consistently kept secret his hypotheses and the basic
facts upon which his conclusions rested, Dr. Reisman charges.
"Neither Kinsey nor any of his team can rightly be termed
`scientists.' Their methodology was not scientific, for it was
neither able to be replicated nor validated. Their data was
anonymous, forced, secretly altered at will and fraudulent. With
the aid of the elite academic world and institutions and the
support of public funds and the social planning foundations,
Kinsey and his associates, who served as his own private male
harem, conducted thousands of sexual interviews to present a
false view of American sexual behaviours."
Amazingly, however, use of Kinsey data as authoritative has never
been seriously challenged--until now. It must not continue, Dr.
Reisman declares: "There [must] be a full and open public
investigation into Kinsey's fraudulent data and its impact upon
lawmakers, the military, the church, the press, the academic
world, the family and all our institutions."
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Review (above) written by
Kevin E. Abrams
Vancouver-based writer Kevin E. Abrams is co-author with Scott
Lively of *THE PINK SWASTIKA: Homosexuality In The Nazi Party.*
**Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences* can be ordered by calling
1-800-837-0544
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
For related stories, visit:
http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
New mailing list: leave message in the old hollow tree stump.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9
