Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Conspiracy Nation Vol. 10 Num. 14
Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 10 Num. 14
=======================================
("Quid coniuratio est?")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P O T P O U R R I
=================
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
$50 million: From Illinois, to Arkansas, to the Cayman Islands
-- Joseph Andreuccetti, an Illinois caulking contractor, gets put
into involuntary bankruptcy. Supposedly he has borrowed
$900,000, but really he never saw one dime of the money. So
where did the money go? Allegedly it, included in a $50 million
Resolution Trust Corporation contingency fund, got sent to
Arkansas to cover up an embezzlement from Madison Guaranty
Savings and Loan. I have spoke and met with Andreuccetti several
times and believe that he was indeed robbed and that the courts
are giving him the runaround in several cases he has subsequently
brought forward.
Next, Congressman Dan Burton (R., Ind.) goes on-record about a
$50 million transfer of Arkansas Development Finance Authority
(ADFA) money to the Cayman Islands. Burton wonders aloud, Why on
earth did ADFA money, meant to benefit Arkansas small business,
get sent to the Cayman Islands? Says Burton on May 29, 1996:
ADFA [Arkansas Development Finance Authority] was created
by Governor Clinton in 1985 to provide economic development
loans in Arkansas. In December of 1988, ADFA deposited $50
million in a Japanese bank in the Cayman Islands. I have a
copy of the contract that I will enter into the record. I
have also delivered a copy of this document to the
Independent Counsel's office. Why would an economic
development agency in Arkansas deposit $50 million in a
bank in the Cayman Islands? The Cayman Islands are a
well-known center of money laundering for drug dealers.
The State Department's international narcotics control
report described the Caymans as "a haven for money
laundering."
One of the questions that I think is very, very important
is why did the Arkansas Development Financial Authority
send $50 million of Arkansas money to the Cayman Islands to
deposit in a bank in the Cayman Islands, which is a major
drug transit point acknowledged by almost every DEA agent
in the world? I have the electronic bank transfer
statements in my office. I am going to put them in the
Congressional Record. There is no doubt the money was
wired to the Cayman Islands. The question needs to be
asked, why was it wired? Why would the Governor of
Arkansas allow that? (Congressional Record, 5/29/96,
H5627-28.)
Later in 1996, Sherman Skolnick and Joseph Andreuccetti file suit
against, among others, First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton,
charging that plaintiffs obstructed disclosure
of the secret details of the unlawful transfer of a 50
million dollar portion of 58.4 million dollars of funds of
the Federal Home Loan Bank, parked and held in custody, and
supposed to be so, with Household Bank and Household
International in the Chicago area, and supposed to be held
to make good the claims of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
...the use of said 50 million dollar unlawful transfer by
defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton was to cover up 47 million
dollars that was misappropriated and embezzled, and/or
otherwise unlawfully encumbered, used, or removed from an
Arkansas savings and loan, Madison Guaranty Savings and
Loan, as to which defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and her
husband, William Jefferson Clinton, committed or caused to
be committed, and allowed, permitted, and condoned, and
acquiesced in, acts and doings punishable under provisions
of the federal criminal code.
Responding to Skolnick and Andreuccetti's lawsuit, lawyers
representing Hillary Rodham Clinton stated that
Plaintiff's complaint fails to meet the minimum standards
of intelligibility and brevity... The complaint is both
frivolous and abusive and is yet another example of
plaintiffs' misuse of the judicial process. Accordingly,
the complaint against Mrs. Clinton should be dismissed with
prejudice.
[The plaintiffs' complaint is] a convoluted and lengthy
collection of allegations that are either unintelligible or
irrelevant. To take but one example, in paragraph 30 (part
of a four-and-a-half page narration of a purported meeting
with an IRS agent), plaintiffs appear to allege that a
United States bankruptcy trustee is corrupt, that the
"nephew/godson" of a bishop embezzled $900,000, that one of
the plaintiffs has been put into involuntary bankruptcy as
a result of fraud, that a bank involved in that bankruptcy
was run by someone who used to be the head of the
"mafia-dominated Vatican Bank," and that the United States
Attorney's Office in Chicago is yet another corrupt
institution. Even after partially untangling this dense
web of accusations, the relationship of the allegations to
any cause of action that might reasonably be brought
against the defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton remains a
complete mystery.
Representing Hillary Rodham Clinton and authors of the above
excerpts from "Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of
Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton's Motion to Dismiss" are David
E. Kendall, Nicole K. Seligman, Max Stier, and also Michael R.
Feagley and Walter M. Rogers of the firm Mayer, Brown & Platt.
Confused? Or perhaps cherubic Lady Clinton's face makes you
think, "Naw, not Hillary. She wouldn't be connected with any
embezzlement." Then consider the following statement by Lisa
Schiffren, as reported in the February 1997 issue of George
magazine:
A better financial journalist than me would be well
employed finding out where the Clintons have stashed their
money offshore. I would imagine there are hundreds of
thousands of dollars sitting in the Cayman Islands. I
really believe this. If I had a lot of time and someone
was willing to pay me a lot of money, I'd go find it. The
$100,000 [which Hillary Rodham Clinton made in the cattle
futures market], courtesy of Tyson Foods, is the tip of the
iceberg. I'm giving them credit for having been bought for
more than a measly hundred grand.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Charles "Chuck" Hayes Convicted -- Ex-CIA agent Chuck Hayes is
fed up with corrupt government. He gets a powerful Cray
computer, loads it into a semi-trailer, then he and his Merry Men
roam the nation, hacking into secret Swiss bank accounts and
putting the fear of God into American politicians. The corrupt
politicos and their bureaucratic minions strike back. Presumably
they have questionable quantity Lawrence Myers, journalist
*extraordinaire*, lie to the FBI that Hayes is shopping for a
"wet boy" (hit man). FBI has one of their agents, reportedly a
former member of the Outlaws motorcycle gang, phone Hayes. Hayes
apparently knows full well he is talking to an FBI man, but
decides to play along. The FBI man says he can do the "job" for
$5,000, and supposedly Hayes contracts with him to murder his
son. Gotcha! FBI arrests Hayes, and Hayes stands trial. A jury
convicts Hayes and he now faces as much as 10 years in prison.
Present during the Hayes trial was "Limpiar Phebi Dojocia"
(pseudonym). I spoke with "Limpiar" on the phone today, and
here's what I got:
** The jury was 8 to 4, with four of its members favoring
acquittal. That got narrowed down to one, then none, and the
jury returned a guilty verdict.
** The prosecution did a last minute, dramatic unveiling of a
Federal Express envelope, giving the impression it was "hot
stuff, just in." The envelope, from the CIA, contained a
response to inquiries. Says CIA: "Chuck Hayes? Chuck Hayes?
Nope, never heard of him." But, says "Limpiar," the envelope in
fact must have arrived on or about January 15, making the January
29th "dramatic unveiling" misleading. An added prosecution
benefit of this "last minute" routine is that defense discovery
guidelines get bypassed; how can prosecution have shared the
letter with defense when they themselves "just now got it."
** Why didn't defense attorney Gatewood Galbraith call Bill
Hamilton, of Inslaw, as a witness? Hamilton could have verified
that Hayes was indeed a former CIA employee. "Limpiar" tells me
that Hamilton was willing to testify. Much of the case hinged on
whether or not Hayes really was a former CIA agent. Apparently
the only one called by Galbraith to corroborate the claim was
James Norman, former senior editor with Forbes magazine.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re-arranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic -- Commenting on recent
revelations regarding FBI crime lab bungling and worse, Stephen
Jones, attorney for accused OKC bombing(s) mastermind Timothy
McVeigh, stated that it was "like re-arranging deck chairs on the
Titanic." Jones thinks that the government's case against
McVeigh is hopeless, and, seemingly, the recent revelations
amount to nothing toward altering the futility of the
government's case.
So what is going on? Why the revelations?
Recall how, not long after the April 19, 1995 bombing(s),
Colonel (Retired) James "Bo" Gritz and others were referring to
McVeigh as "Lee Harvey McVeigh." This was an allusion to Lee
Harvey Oswald, accused lone assassin of President John F.
Kennedy. Paraded into the angry Oklahoma sunshine shortly after
the bombing of the Murrah Building, clad in a bright orange "see
me" jumpsuit, it appeared as if *someone* might save the
prosecution some work by murdering McVeigh, a la Jack Ruby doing
the same to Oswald. Were the government and/or its agents hoping
that might happen, that McVeigh would magically be removed from
the equation?
Unfortunately for those desiring the removal of McVeigh and
consequent absence of a trial in the matter, McVeigh was not
assassinated and the trial is at last imminent. McVeigh's
attorney Stephen Jones seems to be no slouch, and with closed
circuit television to be made available to interested survivors,
family members, and apparently to an alert underground press,
Jones *will* be heard. And he will be heard *without* the
"helpful" little interpolations of corporate "news" media. This
spells trouble for any working to cover up the truth about the
Oklahoma City bombing(s). By now they must be wishing, more
fervently than ever, that McVeigh could somehow just disappear.
With that as background, consider how convenient it would be
for the case against McVeigh to be thrown out, due to tainted
evidence. Recent revelations about FBI crime lab misdoings come
at an opportune time for any who are wishing that the upcoming
trial would just go away. And, FBI could just sit back and say,
"Well, we *know* that McVeigh did it. It's just that picky
legalities thwarted justice."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like "Conspiracy Nation" sent to your e-mail
address, send a message in the form "subscribe cn-l My Name" to
listproc@cornell.edu (Note: that is "CN-L" *not* "CN-1")
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy
Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Want to know more about Whitewater, Oklahoma City bombing, etc?
(1) telnet prairienet.org (2) logon as "visitor" (3) go citcom
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
See also: ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Aperi os tuum muto, et causis omnium filiorum qui pertranseunt.
Aperi os tuum, decerne quod justum est, et judica inopem et
pauperem. -- Liber Proverbiorum XXXI: 8-9
