Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Another Night and Day Alliance 228
#
anada "Casual Expression: #
228 The Intro" +### +### +#### +###
# # # # # # # # # #
by # # # ## # # # # # #
03 SlainElf # .# ## # # .# # .# # .#
dec *### * # * *### * *### * *### *
2000 .+#################################################################.net
understand what the word means just by the context or even the
conditioning. just because webster recognition is unrealized does not imply
that the word is meaningless. and yes, aint went through the same trend a
while ago, but isnt as substantial as this should be. so many
possibilities. kind of like latin or newspeak, maybe. and just maybe just
mentioning a dictionarys lack of words speaks too little. some words wrong
altogether.
a lot stems from dis-. such as disinterested. supposed to mean
apathetic. not one way or another, but should mean: more than uninterested;
less than interested. how about disimpressed. digressing from impressed.
negatively impress. happens a lot. when someone says unimpressed, they
most likely allude to something that was done to impress that didnt make
the grade (gotta hate the cliche in general). disimpression occurs when
someone does something and makes a c minus. emphasis on minus. disinterest
and disimpression. and even dissatisfied. just a few.
other words stem from ___-rity. such as awarity. which probably
grew out of clarity. pay attention to the little things. not actually the
details, more like the subtle nuances. the things people do that get me so
much. the things that they probably never give a second thought. and yeah,
someone said something to the effect of second glances often wiser than
first impressions, but if awarity was as readily taught as trying to see
people for who they are on the inside, life might run so much smoother.
people wear these outside faces for a reason. honesty is dead or at
least dying in that pretense. and this should be an intro to the last thing
written: introspection/extrospection i think. explains so much. not just
that. this could (should/ and very well may be an intro to something else)
the fact that it explains another nuance (and explanation is something
wholly needed; kills when theres none).
what other subtlety does this soon to be wanna-be intro actually
explain? how some musicians write albums and then insert the intro as track
four or somewhere other than the name designate... used to think put slyly
to be witty, but actually some justification may be looming. things as such
are those nuances previously spoken of. but back to the intro i guess.
offension (another one for webster, but use previous learning and
context) played a major role. do unto others what you dont expect them to
do to you. one of many rules. dont believe im above others, just figured
something. and she had to be interested. i thought (things will be
entirely over when i can fully stop talking in the implied fragmented first
person and completely start using the letter i pronoun. strange that i is a
pronoun for the first person though. referring to yourself in the third
person is like saying: michael doesnt want to do this anymore. but i
replaces michael right? first and third person too interrelated. mass
confusion is abound. reason why english flawed? latin so perfect.
understood persons. too much though, third conjugation, second declension
nominitive, and gotta love special -ius adjectives) and still think she was.
sort of. example, small details (not nuances) spoke i thought. until more
of a connection took place. and realization of face wearing dishonesty set
in. shouldnt have to try so hard to live up to everyones expectations of.
how you expect yourself to act.* if you dont like me, please tell me, ill
love you more for that.
*before this sentence is where the intro should have ended. but order means
nothing only meaning.
.+##########################################################################
anada228 by SlainElf (c) 2000
###################################################################anada.net
