Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Anada 206
#
anada "Jason on the #
206 2000 Election" +### +### +#### +###
# # # # # # # # # #
by # # # ## # # # # # #
06 Jason # .# ## # # .# # .# # .#
nov *### * # * *### * *### * *### *
2000 .+#################################################################.net
As I write this, the election for the U.S. Presidency, along with all
of the secondary elections scheduled for the same night. I already voted
through an absentee ballot since I didn't register around here in time. In
the intervening week, I have the anguish that voters who vanished into the
booths don't have. I get to see how things develop knowing that I have
already crossed the Rubicon, so to speak.
"What the fuck is a Rubicon?" says the frat boy in row 3.
A well-hurled brick stops that line of questioning.
So now that I've cast my lot, I decided to take a harder look a the
field beyond the gargantuan political caricatures of Bush and Gore. Let's
start with Nader, candidate of the Green party.
I must say, I began my research with the preconception that Nader was
a quasi-commie who thinks he knows everything about anything and has
probably never had a real job in his life. After exhaustive research, I
came to a definite conclusion: I'm a goddamn genius. I read him perfectly.
Yes, he's one of those people who claims that all of the worlds problems are
created by a secret cabal of old white men who run all of the world's
corporations and that if only we could get rid of them, we would all be
happy. That's the same mentality that has led to our stunning success
against the illegal drug trade. Yes sir, if you take out the top guy,
surely no one will bother to jump up to take his place and all of those
people who would sell their own mothers for one more hit of crack will
become productive citizens, but not TOO productive, since it is evil to make
any kind of profit.
By the way, I would gladly trade MY mother for a cobalt blue
tarantula.
One thing they DON'T tell you is that there are actually TWO Green
Parties, and only one supports Nader. The site comparing their platforms is
at http://webscribe.net/greens/platforms2.html. I don't see what the big
distinction is. They're both the same stripe of we-want-social-justice-and-
equity-for-all-and-if-you-don't-do-it-our-way-we'll-KILL-you fringe party
mentality. Well, the one on the left is a lot wordier, but that's about it.
Oh sure, I agree with some of their points such as political
decentralization and simplification of the tax code, but then they start
getting wacky. They call for decentralization of government, but later on
demand that the federal government pay for and administer a host of social
welfare initiatives. I guess you have to be schizophrenic to be a member of
the party.
Then there's Pat Buchanan. Sweet, lovable, pudgy Pat Buchanan who
wears underwear speckled with swastikas. You didn't have to bend your brain
too hard to get the whiff of good old-fashioned fascism on his TV ads. In
the off-chance that you missed it, his commercials focused on blaming all of
the problems of the world on immigrants sneaking into the country and taking
all of the low-paying, miserable jobs that no one else wants. The irony of
this stance should be self-evident to anyone who is living in a country made
up exclusively of immigrants (yes, even Native Americans are not really
indigenous). Heck, he even questions the Holocaust. Tellingly, I can't
find an issue platform on his page. Maybe immigrants are his only issue.
Surprisingly, the Reform Party, at least the part Buchanan didn't
hijack, endorsed NADER! How's that for a kick in the pants? Check out
their website (http://www.americanreform.org/) if you don't believe me, you
paranoid bastard.
Not so surprisingly, although they hail from opposing camps, ol'
"Send 'Em To the Gulag" Nader and "Gas 'Em All Let God Sort 'Em Out"
Buchanan are as ideologically similar as Hitler and Stalin. They both run
on the platform of isolationism, mercantilism, and the creation of a police
state in their own image. Good friggin' luck, ya bastards.
Sigh. So that leaves us with Bush and Gore, who, as I noted before,
are basically the same candidate with different haircuts. There are
differences, though. I LOVE Gore's pledge to use the surplus to pay down
the debt, but his association with those who would get a hard-on over
muzzling the violent movies I love so much and his pledge to use the
military to further moral causes across the globe destroy my amity for him.
Then there's Bush, who has said that he'll reduce our overseas military
commitments (that's good), he wants to cut taxes based on a surplus that may
not actually exist (that's bad), continue the drive for free trade (that's
good), and he might have been compromised by the Religious Right (that's
bad). They've both missed the boat on Social Security, prescription drugs,
and a couple of other things my cranial limitations will not allow me to
remember. I won't say who I voted for, since I'm hoping that he loses so
that no matter what happens, I can say "I voted for the OTHER guy."
If only we could siphon out the good of both candidates, stick it in
a blender, give the brain of a rational human being like, say, ME, and come
out with the perfect candidate. What'll we do with the crap? We'll put on
thick gloves and roll it together into a misshapen monstrosity called
"Bore." We'll call the shining, golden paragon of commons sense and
political savvy "Gush." Alright, dumb name, but it's late. Gush will be
the front runner and the nefarious Bore will be his running mate, ensuring
the immortality of the President, since no one would want that debilitated
thing in charge.
Cheney who? Lieberman where?
So what'll we do with Nader and Buchanan? Put 'em in a knife fight
and shoot the winner.
Vote Libertarian!
.+##########################################################################
anada206 by Jason (c) 2000
###################################################################anada.net
