Anada 167

Published in

· 5 years ago

  

                           . 
                           .         a n a d a  1 6 7        0 9 - 2 5 - 0 0 
                           . 
  . .   . . .    . .    . .    . .             "President Gore Won't 
 .   .   .   .  .   .  .   .  .   .             Jump In Your Pants" 
 .   .   .   .  .   .  .   .  .   . 
  . . .  .   .   . . .  . . .  . . .                by Jphish 

 
  . . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 From:    Genie Davis <gdavis@EXD.CCS.UA.EDU> 

        Since the U.S. presidential race is realistically a two-man race, I 
 wholeheartedly believe that a vote for Nader would be equivalent to a vote 
 for Bush, which weighs heavy on my conscience.  Also weighing on my 
 conscience, however, is the belief that I should cast my vote for the person 
 whom I consider to have the best policies, regardless of electability. 

        For me, a couple of factors have weighted my decision (reluctantly) 
 toward Gore:  #1.  I do NOT want GWB to appoint the next 3 or 4 Supreme 
 Court justices.  Gore's choices would at least tend toward the moderate, if 
 not liberal.  #2.  Gore may be a bore, but I'm looking for someone to lead 
 the country, not entertain me.  And when I listen to Gore, I hear more 
 substance coming from him than from Dubbya.  (Surprise.)  Gore's too 
 centrist for my tastes, but I think he'll be a better environmental and 
 social issues president than Dubbya.  (Surprise.)  #3.  Though I admire 
 Nader's work, I am not sure if he's sufficiently strong as a presidential 
 candidate to throw my wholehearted support behind his campaign.  I admit 
 that a third-party candidate with political experience at the national level 
 (as well as an outlook that I generally agree with, of course) would 
 probably have me seriously considering trying to pull a "Ventura Victory," 
 but I don't see that happening with Nader.  (Ventura, to non-US people, is 
 the current Minnesota governor, who ran as a Reform Party candidate and 
 didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.  But he did win. 
 Whether this is good or bad depends on who you talk to.)  #4.  Gore does 
 have the experience to back him up.  He has the advantage of working at the 
 national level (and working with international concerns) for many years. 

        Those are my reasons, summed up.  Ultimately, though, you have to go 
 with your conscience.  If you feel strongly enough about voting for your 
 preferred candidate (Nader) that you are willing to accept a Bushy victory, 
 then vote accordingly.  If the prospect of a Bush victory is unthinkable to 
 you, then vote accordingly. ;-) 

  . . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
                                                                              
  .           anada 167                     by Jphish  (c)2000 anada e'zine . 
       
  . . w w w . a n a d a . n e t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .