Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
The Hogs of Entropy 0442
'##::::'##:::'#####:::'########: VIVA LA REVOLUCION! CERDO DEL CAPITALISTA!!
##:::: ##::'##.. ##:: ##.....:: ===========================================
##:::: ##:'##:::: ##: ##::::::: THE HELOTS OF ECSTASY PRESS RELEASE #442 !!
#########: ##:::: ##: ######::: ZIEGO VUANTAR SHALL BE MUCH VICTORIOUS! !!
##.... ##: ##:::: ##: ##...:::: ===========================================
##:::: ##:. ##:: ##:: ##::::::: "News Flash: Women Are Not Helpless" !!
##:::: ##::. #####::: ########: by -> Nitro-187 !!
..:::::..::::.....::::........:: 1/18/99 !!
!!========================================================================!!
A few weeks ago I was having a conversation with a friend of mine
whose opinions I usually hold with a lot of regard. I was completely
aghast when he started talking about how strip clubs were degrading to
women and ought to be shut down. Then I started thinking about how just
about everyone I know who has a somewhat liberal frame of thinking
agrees with just that. There are even bands in the hardcore community
that seem to convey the message that women in pornography and such
things are complete victims being abused by a patriarchal society. I
think that this idea is extremely flawed and dangerous. It just
reinforces the idea that women are helpless.
By buying into that line of thinking, you are completely ignoring
a woman's right to express and make a living in any way she sees fit.
You wouldn't want a blind person to drive frieght trucks, but you would
want someone who had a clear head and was free from any kind of
emotional problems to operate on you. Women who are physically
attractive or considered to be appealing in a sexual way who want to
strip or prostitute themselves are no different. Job skills. The
arguement is that men who see women stripping and patron prostitutes
are only viewing them in a sexual manner is completely pointless. I
seriously doubt that people who say that are interested in the
personality or the life history of the person who is waiting your table
or pumping your gas. They are there to serve you and nothing else.
The anachronistic notion that a woman has to maintain her
virginity and remain "clean" dates back to a time when women were
considered as nothing but property. No matter what, their ideas and
intellect were completely ignored and they had no material possesions to
give to a man. She only had her virginity. While there still is a lot
of sexism and inequality going on, women are treated better here and now
than they have been in any Judaic or Islamic society. So the idea that
a women has only her sex to give is obsolete.
The idea that sexuality is inherently wrong is the single largest
opressor of women. The first recorded civilization, the Sumerians, not
only gave women complete sexual freedom as did men, but worshipped them
as goddesses. Women were the givers of life. They were allowed to
transact in the market place and own property just as men did. In fact
it was because of this that civilizations first alphabet and scriptures
were devised by a group of women who were more or less the government of
the province called the Naditu. Sex was not understood to impregnate
women, it was not considered to defile either the male or female. It
was just another recreational activity. It was not until the isrealite
cult of judaism gained power and destroyed the greatest city in the
world at the time, Babylon, that their ideals of shame were inflicted on
the masses. The male dominated tribe's main scriptures dealing with
creation ended with a woman tempting a man into comitting sin and
displeasing the male god. Her punishment was the pain of child birth.
Doh.
Throughout their scriptures women are a great temptation and
should be avoided. Since women tend to be less physically strong than
men they were quickly subdued and made into property that meant little
more to men than cows or chickens. Since the sexual urge is the
strongest natural biological reflex, they knew that if sexuality could
be controlled than you can control every facet of someone's life. So
extensive sexual laws were put into place. Their blood was upon them,
you know the speil.
Today if you will look at modern nations. The contrast that
existed between Sumerian-Babylonian (their cultures were very similar,
they both worshipped the same goddess, "Ishtar") and the Isreali
cultures is still in place. Denmark, where anyone regardless of age
can purchase a Hustler Magazine and get into a strip club has strict
laws to prevent discrimination of women. The rates of domestic
violence, rape and other such crimes is among the lowest in the
industrialized world. Fundamentalist cultures such as that of Libya and
Lebanon have no pornography at all. They also are the most opressive
nations in the world to women, I'm sure you know that in these countries
women are not allowed to own anything, to drive a car or even in most
cases to show their faces to a man the is not their husband. A similar
situation exists in Singapore, where the neo-fascist People's Action
Party (who reminds me a great deal of the _Orwellian_ Party) places all
kinds of restrictions on literature and media to produce a "clean"
image. Penthouse is banned and so is Red Book. Nudity on any image
that is not that of a classical form of art such as Michaelangelo's
_David_ is generally banned. Singapore has a huge problem with rape
and other crimes against women.
Any research you do on the correlation between pornography and
violence will always point you in one direction: PORN DOES NOT ENCOURAGE
VIOLENCE. If anything it quells the desire to commit various sexual
acts that are not acceptable by most people such as pedophilia,
beastiality and rape. Kiddie porn is readily available in Denmark,
child molestation is pretty non-existant. In the United States, where
it is extremely illegal, we'll hopefully you get my point by now.
I'm sure you've heard televangelists speak of how the AIDS virus
is the wrath of God. If you were to analyze the situation you'd find
out this:
_CHRISTIANITY_ IS THE MAIN CAUSE OF AIDS.
Neo-Puratanism, Victorianism and these type of attitudes that
were held by most of the officials in the U.S. Governement at the
time... and _they_ are responsible for the widespread of the virus. At
the time, heterosexuals tended not to get the new "Gay Cancer". It was
pretty much segregated into certain populations such as Hatian
prostitutes and patrons of gay brothels in larger U.S. cities such as
New York and San Francisco. If these populations were quarantined and
research was done on them to find out the origins of the disease, then
it would not be killing millions every year. It shouldn't have been
difficult, look at how much they knew about Patient Zero and everyone
that he had sexual relations with. Of course, that didn't happen
because politicians were more interested in maintaining the favor of the
puritans who vote for them, and doing anything at all to associate
themselves with sexual deviants like prostitutes and homosexuals would
damage their career. In the later part of the 1980's, when more
research was conducted and it was determined that blah blah blah --
_that_ should have been the end to illegal prostitution. Government
does regulate damn near every industry. Regulating prostitution to
where they had to use condoms similar to the way that doctors have to
wear gloves would cut down on new AIDS cases significantly. Of course
that's contrary to the nature of the people of this country and
probably will never happen. It's just an idea.
i'm sure you've noticed a recurring theme here: PURITANICAL IDEAS
ARE THE BASIS FOR SEXISM, THEY ARE OBSOLETE. ANYONE WHO EMBRACES THEM
IS UNABLE TO BREAK THE CONDITIONING THEY HAVE RECIEVED FROM SOCIEY. IF
PURITANISM WAS OBSOLETE LIKE IT SHOULD BE, THEN ELLEN DEGENERES WOULD NO
LONGER HAVE A CAREER. NOW _THAT_ WOULD TRULY BE A BETTER TOMORROW.
!!========================================================================!!
!! (c) !LA HOE REVOLUCION PRESS! HOE #442, WRITTEN BY NITRO-187 - 1/18/99 !!
