Copy Link
Add to Bookmark
Report
Computer Undergroud Digest Vol. 08 Issue 62
Computer underground Digest Sun Aug 25, 1996 Volume 8 : Issue 62
ISSN 1004-042X
Editor: Jim Thomas (cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu)
News Editor: Gordon Meyer (gmeyer@sun.soci.niu.edu)
Archivist: Brendan Kehoe
Shadow Master: Stanton McCandlish
Field Agent Extraordinaire: David Smith
Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth
Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala
Ian Dickinson
Cu Digest Homepage: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest
CONTENTS, #8.62 (Sun, Aug 25, 1996)
File 1--School Hires Student to Hack into Computers
File 2--U.S. Army computer specialist faces spying charges
File 3--Klemesrud settles Scientology copyright lawsuit for $50,000
File 4--Warning from Family Circle Magazine (fwd)
File 5--Anon.penet forced to reveal names
File 6--ACLU Responds to Princeton "Clarification" of Internet Censorship
File 7--London police provide list of Usenet newsgroups to ban
File 8--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 Apr, 1996)
CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION ApPEARS IN
THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 22:17:12 -0500
From: Frosty <sotmesc@DATASYNC.COM>
Subject: File 1--School Hires Student to Hack into Computers
C Y B E R - S P A C E P R O J E C T Email List / Instructions at the end
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHOOL HIRES STUDENT TO HACK INTO COMPUTERS
The Sun Herald
22 August 1996
Palisades Park, NJ - When in trouble, call an expert.
Students at Palisades Park's high school needed their
transcripts to send off to colleges. But they were in the computer
and no one who knew the password could be reached. So the school
hired a 16-year-old hacker to break in.
"They found this student who apparently was a whiz, and,
apparently, was able to go in and unlock the password," School Board
attorney Joseph R. Mariniello said.
Superintendent George Fasciano was forced to explain to the
School Board on Monday the $875 bill for the services of Matthew
Fielder.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 21:35:53 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: File 2--U.S. Army computer specialist faces spying charges
Whether or not the espionage charges are true, my first take is this
reinforces the claim that we can't trust the government with our most
intimate secrets. If it's even possible that a 20-year old kid might have
"broken into a supposedly impenetrable" military system, any key-escrow
infrastructure the Feds set up will be similarly vulnerable.
-Declan
Date-- Thu, 22 Aug 1996 13--11--28 -0400
From-- "Thomas C. Allard" <m1tca00@FRB.GOV>
source-- http://www.yahoo.com/headlines/960821/news/stories/spy_1.html
U.S. Army Private Faces Spying Charges
WASHINGTON (Reuter) - The U.S. Army said Wednesday it had charged a
20-year-old computer specialist with espionage and computer crimes in a
case that the soldier's parents said involved a Chinese national.
Pfc. Eric Jenott of the 50th Signal Battalion at Fort Bragg, North
Carolina, was formally charged June 28 and is in a Marine Corps jail in
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, awaiting court-martial, the army said.
"The case involves classified information and matters pertaining to
national security," a three-paragraph statement from Fort Bragg, home
of the Army's 18th Airborne Corps, said. It said many of the case's
details were too sensitive to disclose.
Jenott has been charged with giving "secret computer passwords relating
to the national defense" to a Mr. Lee, "a citizen of a foreign
nation," his lawyer said, reading from the charge sheet. He also faces
charges of destruction of government property and larceny.
The charge sheet alleged Jenott disclosed the passwords between April
and June "with the intent or reason to believe it would be used to the
injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation."
It said the passwords "directly concerned communications
intelligence," among the most closely guarded U.S. secrets.
Jenott is facing a general court-martial, the most serious kind, and
a possible life sentence if convicted, his lawyer, Timothy Dunn, of
Fayetteville, North Carolina, said in a telephone interview.
He said his client was "not a criminal" but had broken into a
supposedly impenetrable system after advising his superiors of defects
in the security system. Dunn declined to discuss the system because
of what he called the case's sensitive nature and national security
implications.
John Jenott said his son, a fluent Chinese speaker whom he described as
a "computer genius" with a longstanding interest in China, had given a
young Chinese friend what the son described as an unclassified computer
code.
He said his son knew the person to whom he gave the code from one
of several trips he had made to China. His son, "not your average
kid-out-on-a-skateboard-type guy," could read and write Chinese and
lived with a Chinese family in Vancouver, Canada, for about a year when
he was in high school, the father added.
He said his son told him that before giving away the code, he had
been trying to show his superiors a security flaw in a sensitive
communication system and eventually demonstrated he could get secret
data without authorization.
"He was trying to say we have a weakness," John Jenott said in a
telephone interview from his home in Graham, Washington. "This stuff
about being a spy -- it's ridiculous." His stepmother, Kelly Jenott,
said, "They're blowing this way out of proportion."
His father said an Army major at Fort Bragg, whom he declined to name,
had urged him to persuade his son to sign a confession, so prosecutors
would not seek the death penalty.
Jenott said his son had told him, "Dad, I'd rather die than sign
that."
"He said it's not true. He said, 'I'm not a spy. I didn't commit
espionage. And I'm not going to sign something that says I did,"'
Jenott said.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 17:31:29 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: File 3--Klemesrud settles Scientology copyright lawsuit for $50,000
Newsgroups--alt.religion.scientology
From--tom.klemesrud@support.com
Date--Thu, 22 Aug 96 11:56:16 -0700
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
8/22/96 -- The holders of copyrights to material authored by
L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the controversial Church of Scientology,
have agreed to dismiss the operator of a Los Angeles-based computer
bulletin board service as a defendant from a lawsuit alleging
copyright infringement over the internet.
Early last year, Religious Technology Center (RTC) and Bridge
Publications sued Tom Klemesrud, the operator of the service, along
with his subscriber, Dennis Erlich, and Netcom On-Line
Communication Services, Klemesrud's internet service provider.
Netcom settled out earlier this month. The lawsuit, which
continues to proceed against Erlich, an ex-Scientologist, alleges
that Erlich infringed copyrights by posting material written by
Hubbard to a Usenet newsgroup known as "alt.religion.scientology."
The internet newsgroup has become widely known for its impassioned
postings by both proponents and critics of Scientology.
In a novel claim that would have tested the limits of
liability in cyberspace, the plaintiffs had contended that
Klemesrud and Netcom should be held legally responsible for the
alleged acts of Erlich because he used their computer services to
make his postings to the internet.
Federal District Judge Ronald M. Whyte ruled in November 1995
that Klemesrud could not be found liable for direct infringement,
and could only be found liable for contributory copyright
infringe-ment if there was knowledge of a BBS user's infringement.
"This is the most important thing we have achieved in this
litigation. It has positive ramifications for all of the
Internet," Klemesrud said.
The plaintiffs claimed significant economic damage resulting
from the postings. They alleged that those who might otherwise
have purchased Scientology materials and services were able to
obtain them for free once Erlich posted them to the internet.
The claims against Klemesrud were settled for $50,000, an
amount that is to be paid by Klemesrud's insurance carrier.
Important to Klemesrud, himself a critic of the Church of
Scientology, is the fact that the terms of the settlement include
no admission of liability on his part.
"Settling this case was a business decision by my insurance
company," Klemesrud said. "I would have liked to stay in there and
participate in total exoneration, but I understand it would have
been a lot more expensive to take this case all the way through
trial rather than to pay this token amount now, and be happy with
the positive results we've achieved."
##
For further information call Tom Klemesrud at (818) 985-1750.
------------------------------
From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@EFF.ORG
Subject: File 4--Warning from Family Circle Magazine (fwd)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 12:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
++++++++++++++
Date--Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:58:02 -0400
To--Dave Farber <farber@central.cis.upenn.edu
From--Timothy Barmann <tim@cybertalk.com
Subject--Warning from Family Circle Magazine
Dave,
Got this amusing/disturbing press release from
Family Circle Magazine, apparently to promote an upcoming
article. It reads:
CERTAIN COMPUTER FILE LETTERS
INDICATE PORNOGRAPHY: POLICE CHIEF
New York -- Parents can safeguard their children against
pornography on the internet by watching for files stored
on a computer's hard drive or diskettes that end in the
letters -PCX, -GIF, -GL, TIF, or -JPG, according to the
current (September 17) issue of Family Circle.
"Those are the graphic image files that may be pornographic,
and parents should know what they illustrate," says Police
Chief Alfred Olsen, who monitors online predators in
Pennsylvania.
(End press release).
I'm surprise that TXT was left out, which of course is the
format used to distribute sexually explicit words as
well.
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 13:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Shinn <mshinn@osf1.gmu.edu>
Subject: File 5--Anon.penet forced to reveal names
Don't know if you guys saw this already, but I just read it in a
newsgroup.
Today (August 22nd 1996), the city court in Helsinki ordered
Julf Helsingius to reveal the identity of the anonymous poster
who posted scientology scriptures to a.r.s in March.
In its decision, the court says that anonymous server logs
are not protected by any legislation. Therefore, the information
needed in the police investigation must be provided to the police.
The court also recognized the church's right to control the
publication of the posted documents. Furthermore, the court says
that the anonymous poster, not anyone else, is legally responsible
for the postings.
Julf Helsingius has 30 days to reveal the name. The decision
cannot be appealed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today on 22nd of August the local court of first instance in
Helsinki decided that Johan Helsingius has to reveal the email
adress asked for by the Police Department of Helsinki. This has to
be done within 30 days when summoned for interrogation.
Since this is merely a part of a case, this decision can't be
appealed. If Helsingius still refuses to reveal the info he will be
repeatedly fined and ultimately jailed for up to six months. The
decisions about fines and jail can be appealed, but an appeal won't
stay the execution of the ordered fine/jail, only a judgement of the
appeals court will. The questions about different appeals in this
case are somewhat complex and regarding the possibility to appeal it
was a split decision (4-1).
The court ruled against Helsingius in this matter. During the
hearing Helsingius argued against this view in many ways: he
objected on constitutional grounds and on grounds relating to
statutes regarding criminal investigation.
This information is based mainly on message <4vi0tt$geq@idefix.eunet.fi>
in the local Finnish newsgroup sfnet.keskustelu.laki, by Kaj Malmberg,
the police officer in charge of the investigation of the matter where
Scientology scriptures were posted through anon.penet.fi.
More reports from this case will probably follow soon.
[posted & mailed to a few individuals]
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 20:45:09 GMT
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu, roundtable@cni.org
Subject: File 6--ACLU Responds to Princeton "Clarification" of Internet Censorship
Policy
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
National Legal Department
132 West 43rd Street
New York, New York 10036
(212) 944-9800
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACLU Responds to Princeton "Clarification" of Internet Censorship Policy:
End It, Don't Mend It
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, August 23, 1996
Contact: Ann Beeson, ACLU National, 212-944-9800, x788
David Rocah, ACLU of New Jersey, 201-642-2086
NEW YORK--The American Civil Liberties Union today criticized Princeton
University's "clarification" of its policy barring faculty, students and
staff from using the schools' computer network for "political purposes,"
calling on the university to rescind the ban.
The clarification memo was issued after the ACLU contacted Princeton in
an August 15 letter, urging university officials to end its policy.
According to the Princeton clarification, the policy was meant to prevent
students and staff from "personal use" of the network specifically for
"campaign activities."
In a follow-up letter sent today to Princeton officials, the ACLU said
the university's response "still falls short of constitutional
requirements," and would only serve to confuse the issue further." The
letter was signed by Ann Beeson, ACLU national staff attorney and David
Rocah, staff attorney for the
ACLU of New Jersey.
"The clarification is as clear as mud," said David Rocah. "In fact, the
only thing that's clear about Princeton's policy is that it is still
unconstitutional." Rocah said the policy violates free speech protections
in the New Jersey state constitution.
In its memo, issued late yesterday, Princeton conceded that the policy
was "overly broad," and stated that "students, faculty and staff are
generally free to communicate their personal views on political candidates
using e-mail and the Internet." But officials once again cited the
university's not-for-profit status as a rationale for limiting speech,
warning that "the IRS may deem personal use of University resources for
campaign activities, including use of the Internet, to be political
campaign activity by the University itself."
That interpretation is still wrong, the ACLU countered. "As we pointed
out in our initial letter, Internal Revenue Service rulings make clear that
only campaigning by Princeton officials on behalf of the university could
affect its tax-exempt status," said national staff attorney Ann Beeson.
"Just as students have traditionally distributed political campaign
material on the university commons, they have the right to send it through
the Internet," Beeson added. "In fact, campaign literature is arguably the
most fundamental type of speech in our democratic system of government.
There is nothing more important than choosing our political leaders and
knowing what they stand for."
The letter urged Princeton to resolve the issue quickly as the
presidential election approaches, and requested a meeting with Princeton
officials to discuss the matter further. If the university refuses to drop
its censorship policy, the ACLU said it would consider legal action.
Note to Editors: The ACLU's August 23 letter to Princeton follows. Please
contact our national press office at (212) 944-9800, ext. 414, for copies
of the ACLU's original August 15 letter and copies of the Princeton policy
memos. To access this information online, visit the ACLU's website
<http://www.aclu.org> or America Online site (keyword: ACLU).
-30-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT OF LETTER FROM ACLU COUNSEL TO PRINCETON UNIVERSITY:
August 23, 1996
BY FACSIMILE, E-MAIL, & REGULAR MAIL
Howard S. Ende
Office of General Counsel
120 Alexander Street, 2nd Floor
Princeton, New Jersey 08544-2086
RE: Computer Use Policy
Dear Mr. Ende:
We believe the clarification you issued yesterday regarding Princeton's
policy on use of the computer network for political purposes still falls
short of constitutional requirements. We suggest a meeting with you and
President Shapiro to discuss the issue further; we are both available for a
meeting during the week of September 9 - 13.
Specifically, the memo issued yesterday will further confuse Princeton
students and staff regarding their political speech rights on the computer
network, and thus will inhibit speech protected by the New Jersey State
Constitution. The memo rightly concedes that the policy statement dated
July 19, 1996 is "overly broad," and that "students, faculty and staff are
generally free to communicate their person views on political candidates
using e-mail and the internet." However, the memo goes on to state that
"Nonetheless, we continue to ask everyone to bear in mind that the IRS may
deem personal use of University resources for campaign activities,
including use of the internet, to be political campaign activity by the
University itself."
This final sentence is inaccurate as a matter of law. As stated in our
letter dated August 15, 1996, personal use of the network for "campaign
activities" is constitutionally protected political speech and in no way
threatens Princeton's tax-exempt status. See ACLU Letter to Princeton,
8/15/96, at 2. Because Princeton provides fair and equal access to the
computer network to all University members, and allows use of the network
for a variety of non-political purposes, the provision of computing
facilities to students and staff, even for campaigning activities, will not
jeopardize the university's 501(c)(3) status. The computer network is
analogous to the Princeton commons, where university students and staff
have long been free to distribute and obtain campaign literature and to
encourage votes for particular political candidates. The fact that this
activity is taking place on the computer network makes it no less protected
political speech. In fact, campaign literature is arguably the most
fundamental type of speech in our democratic system of government. There
is nothing more important in choosing our political leaders than knowing
what they stand for.
The recent statement is also vague and fails to notify university members
clearly as to whether personal use of the network for "campaign activities"
is a violation of university policy. In addition, the University now has
issued at least five separate policies and statements that govern use of
the computer network for political purposes: the August 22, 1996
clarification memorandum; the July 19, 1996 memorandum on "Internet use and
Policy;" the "Computer Use" guidelines at page 11 of the Rights, Rules,
Responsibilities handbook; the "Guidelines Relating to the Tax-Exempt
Status of the University and Political Activities," at pages 14-15 of the
Rights, Rules, Responsibilities handbook; and the 1995-96 "Guidelines for
use of Campus and Network Computing Resources." These conflicting policies
and statements are sure to cause confusion among university members, which
will inhibit students and staff from exercising their right to free speech
on the computer network.
If you continue to believe that 501(c)(3) restrictions prevent certain
political communications over computer networks, we urge you to seek an
advisory ruling on the matter from the Internal Revenue Service. In the
meantime, all five policies and statements must be clearly and
unequivocally suspended, and a statement must be issued clarifying that all
university members and groups may engage in political speech and campaign
activities over the computer network so long as they do not purport to
speak for the university itself.
Because we are nearing the end of an election year, it is crucial that this
matter be resolved quickly in order to ensure that Princeton students and
staff are able to exercise fully their political speech rights.
Thank you for your prompt response to our prior letter and your willingness
to continue this important discussion.
Very truly yours,
Ann Beeson, Staff Attorney
American Civil Liberties Union
National Legal Department
132 West 43rd Street
New York, New York 10036
(212) 944-9800 x788
David Rocah, Staff Attorney
American Civil Liberties Union
of New Jersey
2 Washington Place
Newark, NJ 07102
(201) 642-2086
cc: President Harold Shapiro
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 23:18:34 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: File 7--London police provide list of Usenet newsgroups to ban
Recently the London police sent a letter to U.K. Internet providers saying
that 133 Usenet newsgroups must be banned.
>From observations at <http://www.uk.vbc.net/censorship>, it's clear that:
the Police regard ISPs as publishers
the publication of obscene materials is an offence
the Police expect ISPs to continuously monitor newsgroups and
to remove those which contain illegal materials
More ominously, the letter says "Furthermore, this list is not exhaustive
and we are looking to you to monitor your Newsgroups identifying and taking
necessary action against those others found to contain such material...
This list is only the starting point..." Also, the police have said they
have the power to arrest Internet providers and seize their equipment.
This move by the Brits is disappointing, but perhaps not surprising. I have
background about many more international net-censorship attempts at:
http://www.eff.org/~declan/global/
-Declan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*** COPIED FROM: >>>Usenet/alt.censorship 98310
....internet header cut....
Subject-- Re: POLICE CENSORSHIP - HERE, NOW IN THE UK
Date-- Wed, 14 Aug 1996 22:28:38 GMT
On Wed, 14 Aug 96 17:39:54 GMT, andyc@waverider.co.uk (Andy Cowan)
wrote:
To all subscribers:
Our upstream provider, VBCNet, has informed us that today, they, and
other ISPs in the UK have received a notification from the Metropolitan
Police to remove 134 news groups from their news servers. Therefore, we
are no longer being fed these groups. As many of you will have seen,
recently, in a thread in the waverider.support newsgroup, Wave Rider
Internet Plc are
opposed to such censorship as a matter of principle - as I know many
of you are.
The letter from the Met makes it clear that this is only the
beginning - they plan to ban whatever newsgroups they see fit over the
coming months.
We urge you all to protest this action - use the media, contact your
MPs, generate whatever protest you see fit - or the UK Internet is going
to be operated by the whim of the Clubs & Vice unit of the Metropolitan
Police.
At present, Wave Rider Internet Plc have received no such notification from
the police, and will therefore not be removing any groups. However, as
we're not being fed them anymore, that's academic - there will shortly be
nothing in them.
I am enclosing the copy of the letter from the Met, that we have been
sent by VBCNet.
Andy Cowan
Technical Director
Wave Rider Internet Plc
PS: I will follow this later with my own, personal views. This is an
official statement.
[...]
---
Date--Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
From--Dale Amon <amon@twin-peaks.gpl.net>
The CDA sickness begun in the US is now spreading into Europe. This was
recieved from our upstream provider in London (I am a director on
an ISP in Northern Ireland)
Anyone who wishes to write to the Gestapo Commandant and tell him off
is more than welcome.
Date--Wed, 14 Aug 1996 15:33:52 +0100 (BST)
From--Jim Dixon <jdd@vbc.net>
To: euro-customers@vbc.net
Subject--police censorship
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Like other UK ISPs, VBCnet today received a demand from the Metropolitan
Police that some 134 news groups be deleted from our news machines.
The letter makes it clear that this is only the beginning, that they
will be banning more groups and requiring ISPs to enforce their
dictats. We have with great reluctance complied with their demand.
While we do not disagree that the articles in some of these groups are
often objectionable, we disagree in principle with this form of censorship.
We urge all of you to make it clear to your customers why these news
groups have been withdrawn and we urge you to contact your MPs and
the media about this arbitrary action by the police. If there is no
protest, if a precedent is established, the UK Internet is going to
fall under the control of the Clubs and Vice Unit at Charing Cross
Police Station.
VBCnet is setting up a Web page to protest this action. It should be
available at
http://www.uk.vbc.net/censorship
by the end of the day. We will add pointers to other protesting Web
pages -- well, the ones that are calm and reasonable. ;-)
--
Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
http://www.uk.vbc.net VBCnet West +1 408 971 2682 fax +1 408 971 2684
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date-- 9th August 1996
METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE
Clubs and Vice Unit
Charing Cross Police Station
Agar Street
London WC2N 4JP
Telephone: 0171 321 7752
Facsimile: 0171 321 7762
To: All Internet Service Providers
Dear Sir / Madam
Pornographic Material on the Internet
Further to the seminar held at New Scotland Yard on 2nd August I enclose,
as promised by Superintendent Mike Hoskins, a list of those Newsgroups
which we believe contain pornographic material.
We have attempted to confirm that the Newsgroups listed currently contain
this offensive material but as you will be only too aware the content is
continually changing and you will need to satisfy yourself about the
nature and content before taking any action. Furthermore, this list is
not exhaustive and we are looking to you to monitor your Newsgroups
identifying and taking necessary action against those others found to
contain such material. As you will be aware the publication of obscene
articles is an offence.
This list is only the starting point and we hope, with the co-operation
and assistance of the industry and your trade organisations, to be moving
quickly towards the eradication of this type of Newsgroup from the
Internet. At the seminar we debated the means of maintaining an up to
date list and you will recall that ISPA volunteered to pool information
and assist in this initiative. However, we are very anxious that all
service providers should be taking positive action now, whether or not
they are members of a trade association.
We trust that with your co-operation and self regulation it will not be
necessary for us to move to an enforcement policy.
Yours Faithfully
Stephen French
Chief Inspector
List
alt.binaries.pictures.boys
alt.binaries.pictures.child.erotica.female
alt.binaries.pictures.child.erotica.male
alt.binaries.pictures.children
alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.children
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica child
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.female
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.male
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.lolita
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.fuck
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.young
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.fucking
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.misc
alt.sex.boys
alt.sex.children
alt.sex.fetish.tinygirls
alt.sex.girls
alt.sex.incest
alt.sex.intergen
alt.sex.pedophile.mike-labbe
alt.sex.pedophilia.
alt.sex.pedophilia.boys
alt.sex.pedophilia.girls
alt.sex.pedophilia.swaps
alt.sex.pedophilia.pictures
alt.sex.pre-teens
alt.sex.teens
alt.sex.weight-gain 0000000928 0000000418 y
alt.fan.cock-sucking 0000001482 0000001311 y
alt.binaries.pictures.voyeurism 0000005117 0000004495
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.fucking 0000001097 00000861 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.voyeurism 0000011396 0000010495 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.young 0000006499 0000005208 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.uniform 0000001274 0000001110 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.urine 0000005542 0000004911 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.fuck 0000003398 0000003162 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.uncut 0000002220 0000001970 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.spanking 0000005484 0000004927 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.female.masturbation 0000003770
0000003085 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pornstars 0000010919 0000010192 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pre-teen 0000004945 0000004100 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.oral 0000013599 0000012668 y
alt.binaries.fetish.scat 0000000958 0000000842 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.anime 0000001886 0000001724 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.centerfolds 0000015743 0000014219 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.senior-citizens 0000004426 0000003944 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.animals 0000001511 0000001403 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.art.pin-up 0000003274 0000002916 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.breasts.small 0000004812 0000004400 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.butts 0000010763 0000010048 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cheerleaders 0000010297 0000009498 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.disney 0000001471 0000001281 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.feet 0000008454 0000007840 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.hair 0000003162 0000002804 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotic.senior-citizens 0000004042 0000003695 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen 0000005349 0000005098 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male.anal 0000004414 0000004164 y
alt.sex.pedophile.mike-labbe 0000001015 0000000752 y
alt.sex.masturbation 0000004038 0000002204 y
alt.sex.fetish.tickling 0000014620 0000011227 y
alt.sex.fetish.waifs 0000007005 0000005391 y
alt.sex.fetish.watersports 0000015798 0000012599 y
alt.sex.fetish.wrestling 0000008522 0000006281 y
alt.sex.first-time 0000007333 0000005072 y
alt.sex.fetish.girl.watchers 0000006418 0000003795 y
alt.sex.homosexual 0000025299 0000020411 y
alt.sex.incest 0000016099 0000009889 y
alt.sex.intergen 0000012715 0000010756 y
alt.sex.jp 0000003101 0000002194 y
alt.sex.magazines 0000016261 0000012956 y
alt.sex.masturbation 0000066212 0000058405 y
alt.sex.movies 0000090182 0000084718 y
alt.sex.necrophilia 0000003469 0000002177 y
alt.sex.pedophilia 0000040531 0000026257 y
alt.sex.pictures 0000120660 0000097707 y
alt.sex.pictures.female 0000091859 0000067880 y
alt.sex.pictures.male 0000040412 0000032695 y
alt.sex.services 0000038170 0000032355 y
alt.sex.spam 0000000717 0000000283 y
alt.sex.spanking 0000043401 0000037424 y
alt.sex.stories 0000130604 0000115635 y
alt.sex.strip-clubs 0000035850 0000030078 y
alt.magazines.pornographic 0000005618 0000003705 y alt.magick.sex
0000007227 0000006197 y
alt.personals.spanking.punishment 0000006983 0000005028 y
alt.sex. 0000318682 0000299098
alt.sex.anal 0000028283 0000020514 y
alt.sex.bestiality 0000039473 0000035720 y
alt.sex.bondage 0000175209 0000162338 y
alt.sex.breast 0000035836 0000029671 y
alt.sex.enemas 0000009235 0000007242 y
alt.sex.exhibitionism 0000046981 0000035201 y
alt.sex.fat 0000015956 0000013563 y
alt.sex.fetish.diapers 0000012816 0000010872 y
alt.sex.fetish.fa 0000015012 0000010470 y
alt.sex.fetish.feet 0000025850 0000022025 y
alt.sex.fetish.hair 0000011779 0000010356 y
alt.sex.fetish.orientals 0000047159 0000044315 y
alt.binaries.multimedia.erotica 0000094765 0000092313
alt.binaries.pictures.boys 0000025827 0000025062 y
alt.binaries.pictures.children 0000009753 0000009586 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica 0000387356 0000382534 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.d 0000012832 0000012505 y
alt.binaries.pictures.amateur.female 0000104107 0000100909 y
alt.binaries.pictures.amateur.male 0000020070 0000019186 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.anime 0000031144 0000030438 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bestiality 0000022378 0000021836 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.blondes 0000061623 0000059763 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.bondage 0000060612 0000058636 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.cartoons 0000023721 0000023233 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.female 00000155979 0000152810 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.furry 0000007251 0000007021 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.gaymen 0000047272 0000045207 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.male 0000137705 0000135723 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica. orientals 0000096484 0000094139 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.pregnant 0000000038 0000000039 m
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen 0000048099 0000046561 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.d 0000005063 0000004755 y
alt.binaries.pictures.girlfriend 0000029946 0000029100 y
alt.binaries.pictures.girlfriends 0000055197 0000053838 y
alt.binaries.pictures.girl 0000022149 0000021105 y
alt.binaries.pictures.horny.nurses 0000001839 0000001704 y
alt.binaries.pictures.pictures.nudism 0000032432 0000031050 y
alt.binaries.pictures.tasteless 0000036867 0000036442 y
alt.homosexual 0000080096 0000072533 y
alt.sex.swingers 0000027930 0000020021 y
alt.sex.telephone 0000027530 0000021705 y
alt.sex.trans 0000015985 0000011104 y
alt.sex.wanted 0000082382 0000071809 y
alt.sex.watersports 0000005838 0000003666 y
alt.sex.bestiality.pictures 0000000791 0000000300 y
alt.sex.children 0000001311 0000000690 y
alt.sex.cu-seeme 0000001049 0000000273 y
alt.sex.fetish.scat 0000002756 0000001143 y
alt.sex.fetish.tinygirls 0000003322 0000001229 y
alt.sex.fetish.wet-and-messy 0000003209 0000001432 y
alt.sex.oral 0000007820 0000003177 y
alt.sex.orgy 0000004025 0000001330 y
alt.sex.pedophilia.girls 0000001130 0000000267 y
alt.sex.pedophilia.pictures 0000001138 0000000276 y
alt.sex.pictures.d 0000005114 0000002086 y
alt.sex.stories.gay 0000002918 0000000997 y
alt.sex.stories.tg 0000001831 0000001078 y
alt.sex.super-size 0000001987 0000000711 y
alt.sex.tasteless 0000001003 0000000202 y
alt.sex.teens 0000002394 0000000540 y
alt.sex.video-swap 0000001363 0000000489 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.black.male 0000012581 0000012054 y
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children 0000005812 0000005117 y
alt.sex.sm.fig 0000006729 0000004915 y
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:51:01 CST
From: CuD Moderators <cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu>
Subject: File 8--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 7 Apr, 1996)
Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are
available at no cost electronically.
CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest
Or, to subscribe, send post with this in the "Subject:: line:
SUBSCRIBE CU-DIGEST
Send the message to: cu-digest-request@weber.ucsd.edu
DO NOT SEND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE MODERATORS.
The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302)
or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL
60115, USA.
To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB CU-DIGEST
Send it to CU-DIGEST-REQUEST@WEBER.UCSD.EDU
(NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line)
Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest
news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of
LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT
libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in
the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;"
On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG;
on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet);
and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (860)-585-9638.
CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from
1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome.
EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown)
Brussels: STRATOMIC BBS +32-2-5383119 2:291/759@fidonet.org
In ITALY: ZERO! BBS: +39-11-6507540
In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893
UNITED STATES: etext.archive.umich.edu (192.131.22.8) in /pub/CuD/CuD
ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/
aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/
world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/
EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/CuD/CuD/ (Finland)
ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom)
The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the
Cu Digest WWW site at:
URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/
COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing
information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of
diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long
as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and
they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that
non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise
specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles
relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are
preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts
unless absolutely necessary.
DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent
the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all
responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not
violate copyright protections.
------------------------------
End of Computer Underground Digest #8.62
************************************
