Audyssey Issue 37

eZine lover (@eZine)

Published in 

Audyssey

 · 5 years ago

  

Audyssey; 
Games Accessible to the Blind 
Issue 37: Second Quarter, 2003 
Edited by Michael Feir 

Fun, Friendship, Knowledge, Charity 

+++ 
Welcome 
Welcome to the thirty-seventh issue of Audyssey. This magazine is dedicated to the discussion of games which, through accident or design, are accessible to the blind either with or without sighted assistance. 

This issue has a healthy amount of news from game developers as well as some interesting discussions which took place over the last quarter. There are also articles looking at game difficulty as well as replay value. 

Note: This magazine uses plus-signs as navigation markers. Three plus-signs are placed above any articles or sections. Within these sections, two plus-signs denote the start of a new sub-section. Smaller divisions are marked by a single plus-sign. This allows people to use their search capabilities to go quickly to the next division they are interested in. For instance, the "Letters" section is preceded by three plus-signs. Each letter within it has two plus-signs before it. Answers to letters have a single plus-sign before them. 

+++ 
Distribution Information and Submission Policies 
This magazine is published on a quarterly basis, each issue appearing no earlier than the fifteenth of the publication month for its quarter. All submissions to be published in an issue must be in my possession a minimum of two days before the issue is published. I use MS-Word to produce Audyssey, and can therefore accept submissions in pretty much any format. They may be sent either on a 3.5-inch floppy disk, or via e-mail to: 
mfeir@cogeco.ca 
I will give my home address at the end of the magazine. 
Please write articles and letters about games or game-related 
topics which interest you. They will likely interest me, and your fellow readers. This magazine should and can be a  
highly interesting and qualitative look at accessible gaming. To insure that high quality is maintained, I'll need your  
written contributions. I reserve the right to unilaterally make changes to submissions if I deem it necessary to improve them  
grammatically or enhance their understand ability. I will never make changes which will alter the spirit of a submission.  
All submissions must be in English. However, people need not be great writers to have their work appear in Audyssey.  
Many of our community come from different countries. Others are quite young. Where possible, I try to preserve their  
different styles of expression. The richness that this adds to the Audyssey experience far outweighs any benefits  
gained from having everything in prose so perfect as to be devoid of life. Audyssey is a community and magazine built  
on the need for blind people to have fun. There are no formal structural requirements for submissions. Within reason,  
they may be as long as necessary. Game reviews should all clearly state who created the game being examined, where it  
can be obtained, whether it can be played without sighted assistance, and any system requirements or other critical  
information. Although profanity is by no means banned, it should not be used gratuitously. Submissions not published  
in a current issue will be reserved for possible use in future issues if appropriate. Those who are on the Audyssey  
discussion list should be aware that I often put materials from the list in the "Letters" section if I feel that they warrant it. Anything posted to this discussion list that in some way stands out from the common and often lively ongoing  
discourse will be considered fair game for publishing unless it contains the author's wish that it not be published. 

This magazine is free in its electronic form, and will always remain so. Due to a lack of demand, PCS Games is no longer making Audyssey available on disk. I'm writing this magazine as much 	 
for my own interest as for everyone else's. Your articles, reviews, and letters, as well as any games you might care to send me are what I'm after. 

Accessible Game developers should be aware that I very much appreciate receiving copies of their games for review purposes. Many developers have treated my wife and I to free copies of their games purely to thank me for my extensive efforts in keeping Audyssey Magazine alive and well. I sincerely hope this continues as it makes it all far more worth-while for me to continue working on Audyssey and for my wife to tolerate the time and energy I put into the magazine. For the record, my policy on this is as follows: 

I will review any free full version game that I am sent as fairly and thoroughly as I can. Also, if developers wish and are able to, they can provide a single registration key or unlocking code to be used by Audyssey staff and/or reviewers chosen by me from people who have written material for Audyssey. Another benefit of sending me free full copies of your games is that I can demonstrate them to interested people and/or special interest groups when opportunities for this present themselves. Whether or not these games are of particular interest to me, I pledge to learn to play them as competently as those games which I am partial to so that I can facilitate their demonstration and enjoyment for others. I will never give out full game copies unless you specifically offer me free full copies for distribution to one or more people in such groups. I may, however, assemble CDs containing game demos to share with such groups. If any developers do not want their demos to be given via CD during such presentations, please inform me of your wishes in this matter. Where time permits, I’ll attempt to keep all developers informed of any opportunities which emerge for me to be an ambassador for accessible games. Whether or not developers choose to send free full copies of games is entirely up to them. If they do not, I will use a game demo to form my opinions of the game and write a review in Audyssey Magazine. My time is limited, and I will give priority to free full games that I receive. However, developers need not fear that I will treat their games more harshly or abuse my editorial powers if they choose not to send full copies. I believe I’ve written reviews for long enough that developers will have a good idea of my sense of fairness in this. For an example of a review of a demo game, see my comments on ESPSoftworks’s Change Reaction in issue 35.  

For people who need help with games, send any games, articles, letters, or reviews via E-mail, or on a 3.5-inch disk in a self-addressed mailer so that I can return your disk or disks to you once I have copied their contents onto my hard drive.  
Please only send shareware or freeware games. It is illegal to send commercial games unless you are their creator or have  obtained permission to do so. By sending me games, you will do several things: first, and most obviously, you will earn my gratitude. You will also insure that the games you send me are made available to my readership as a whole. As a 
further incentive, I will fill any disks you send me with games 
from my collection. No disk will be returned empty. If you want 
specific games, or specific types of games, send a message in ASCII format along. If you have a particular game that you need help with, and you are sending your questions on a disk anyhow, include the game so that I can try and get past  your difficulty. If you can, I recommend that you send e-mail. I can send and receive attachments with ease. This way, no money will be wasted sending me a game I already have, and 
you'll get my reply more quickly. You are responsible for shipping costs. That means, either use a disk mailer which has  your address on it, and is either free matter for the blind, or is properly stamped. I can and will gladly spare time to share  
games and my knowledge of them, but cannot currently spare money above what I spend hunting for new games. 

I encourage all my readers to give my magazine to whoever they think will appreciate it. Up-load it onto web pages and bulletin board systems. Copy it on disk for people, or print it out for sighted people who may find it of value. The larger  
our community gets, the more self-sustaining it will become. 

There are now several ways of obtaining Audyssey. Thanks to the generous support of Monarch, Your PC1Source LLC., Audyssey Magazine now has an official home on the Web. All previous issues of Audyssey can be obtained from there in several different formats. LVG makes Audyssey available in MS-Word and PDF formats. There efforts on our behalf are very much appreciated. Visitors may take advantage of a growing amount of content as well as submit material. Check it out at: 
www.audysseymagazine.org 

Those who want to receive issues of Audyssey as they are published should send a blank E-mail to: 
Audysub-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 
     
The Audyssey discussion list facilitates discussion about games  
accessible to the blind between the publication of issues of Audyssey. All are welcome as long as they respect their fellow community members and keep in mind that the topic of the list is supposed to be games. Other topics are allowed within reason as long as they don't begin to monopolize the list traffic for too long. Newcomers should be advised that  
traffic is frequently fairly heavy. To help those who are swamped with E-mail cope with this, there is a digest mode available which sends one large E-mail per day containing the day's traffic. Anyone participating in the discussion list will have issues of Audyssey automatically sent to them via E-mail. Representatives from all major developers of games for the blind are actively participating on the list. All staff members of Audyssey are also encouraged to participate on the discussion list. There are two moderators keeping things civil and orderly. Be certain to read the Audyssey Community Charter as all list members are expected to follow its rules. If you want an active role in shaping the future of accessible games, this is where you can dive right in. To subscribe to this discussion list, send a blank message to: 
blindgamers-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 
To post messages to the list, send them to: 
blindgamers@yahoogroups.com 
Should you wish to unsubscribe, send a blank message to: 
Blindgamers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 
To change your subscription to digest mode so that you only receive one message per day, send a blank message to: 
Blindgamers-digest@yahoogroups.com 
To go back to receiving individual messages, send a blank message to: 
Blindgamers-normal@yahoogroups.com 
There are more options at your disposal. To find out about them, send a blank message to: 
Blindgamers-help@yahoogroups.com 

 
Stan Bobbitt has made Audyssey Magazine available in HTML format for easy on-line browsing. To take advantage of this, you are invited to visit our home-page. People can easily and quickly navigate through the various articles and reviews, and directly download or visit the sites of the games that interest them. This will be of especial benefit for sighted people who wish to make use of Audyssey and/or join the growing community surrounding it. The Audyssey community thanks Mr. Bobbitt for his continued  
efforts on its behalf in this matter. 

You can also find all issues of Audyssey on the Internet on Paul Henrichsen's web site at: 
www.henrichsen.org 
J.J. Meddaugh has long been famous in the Audyssey community. He has now started his own web-site called The Blind Community. All issues of Audyssey are there in zipped files in the file centre. 

Another site has recently added Audyssey issues to its resources. We welcome: 
www.blindhelp.com 
to the Audyssey community and hope that visitors to this site find our resource to be of value to them. 
If you have ftp access, all issues are also available at Travis Siegel's ftp site: 
ftp://ftp.softcon.com 
Look in the /magazines directory. 

 

 
 +++ 
Contents: 
Welcome 
Distribution Information and Submission Policies 
Contents 
From The Editor 
Letters 
Accessible Online Multi-Player Gaming 
Handheld Fun 
Enchantment’s Twilight Development Diary: Part III 
Adaptive Techniques in Difficulty Management 
Free Game Winner 
News From BSC Games 
News From ESP Softworks 
News From GMA Games 
Update on Robison Bryan's Audio Adventure Game Engine 
News From PCS 
Play it Again, Sam! 
Game Announcements and Reviews 
Contacting Us 

 

+++ 
From The Editor: 

Hello to all my readers new and old. It’s been quite an interesting three months. Some new games have been released, and you’ll be learning all about those later on in this issue. What really stands out in this issue, however,  is news of what’s being worked on and some very interesting thinking going on in the minds of our community members. I wish I could have given you ten times the glimpse into the fantastic discussions which went on. Heavy topics like game piracy, advertising techniques, and the kinds of games people want which have yet to be made were all taken up eagerly. Game developers are doing a great job participating in these discussions when they’re able. It seems that the community has a good intelligence network. A major event occurred when information arrived concerning a beta-testing version of a demo of GMA Tank Commander. Dave tells me he didn’t exactly plan on so many people getting their hands on that, but is very pleased at how things turned out. People pounced on and devoured it as if it were the only cup of water on a desert planet. There can be little doubt that the full game when it’s actually ready will be successful on a large scale. I’m going to hold off reviewing the game until that point, but that doesn’t stop anybody from doing a review of the demo. 

On that note, we can always use more articles and reviews. I can only make issues as good as this one when I’m given lots of material. In particular, interactive fiction suffers from a lack of coverage. To any text adventurers out there, I’d very much appreciate it if you could review the games you’ve been playing. Also, even the popular sound-based games like Dynaman had no reviews of them sent in for use in Audyssey. It’ll be a far better resource for people if there are more opinions about these games for them to read. Also, it’ll be more interesting for me to put these issues together. Game developers and I already know what I think of games. What I and they want to know is what you, their customers and fans, think of their efforts. Prospective newcomers need a better sampling of what people think of a game they may be thinking of trying. Let’s give it to them, folks. 

Unfortunately, we’ve lost one of our most ardent supporters from the early days of the Audyssey community. Guy Vermeulen has apparently passed away. When things were slowly getting started as word of Audyssey and accessible games spread, he was always willing to share his thoughts on games as well as what was happening in the growing community. He always demonstrated a caring and thoughtfulness that made him a superb role model for all members. When discussions got hot-tempered, he kept his cool and helped others, myself included to see the value in this. Along with his friend Hugo, Guy also helped organise and start the popular Mach 1 races which take advantage of Jim Kitchen’s free racing game. He was keenly looking forward to James North’s ESP Raceway which he’ll sadly never have a chance to experience. I would like to take this opportunity to posthumously thank Guy for all his efforts on behalf of the Audyssey community and for supporting me personally in what I was trying to achieve. He sent many helpful and encouraging E-mails my way over the years. 

We also learned that ESP Softworks is winding its operations down. James North has sent along an update with more details which you’ll find later in this issue. However, people can still purchase games as long as the web site remains open. James plans to develop ESP Raceway as well as a second version of his Pinball game before closing up shop. Those of you thinking of purchasing ESP Softworks games should do so over the next while since it is unclear if they will be available after James pulls the plug. People shouldn’t take that to mean that support for owners of ESP products will stop. James has made it quite clear that technical support and customer care will continue after the closure. 

On the brighter side, things are gearing up in a number of other areas. Robison Brian is still hard at work on his adventure engine. This looks like it could have an absolutely revolutionary effect on the accessible games community when it’s in full working order. It will reportedly allow anyone willing to learn a method of developing high-quality and complex sound-based games. The only major question I see is whether people will be willing to purchase the engine before there are a lot of games developed which require it. The event taking place when this engine launches commercially will be the closest thing we’ve seen to the launch of a new game console in the sighted world. Read his update later in this issue for further details. BSC Games is also moving forward with new and exciting plans. I now believe we’re firmly heading in the right direction as a community and as a small but growing market. We’ve just got to keep the momentum going and do whatever we can to support accessible game developers. 

There’s a whole lot to look forward to over the summer. Rebecca and I are celebrating our first anniversary on June 15th, and we already have a few things lined up for the Summer months. Chances are good that so do at least some of our game developers. Please keep those articles and game reviews coming, folks. I’m quite pleased with what I ultimately had to work with this time around and hope that this continues to be the case for future issues. This last week before I published what you’re now reading has easily been the most stress-free one I’ve ever experienced. In fact, I was able to drop everything and go out on an afternoon excursion. This had a lot to do with ground rules I’ve set on how long I work on Audyssey each day. If married life teaches anything, it’s time management. Over the first year, I’ve learned some valuable lessons in balancing my own ambitions and sense of meeting my public obligations with the need to further personal relationships. It also had a lot to do with the efforts of the readers who chose to spend their time writing such excellent and thoughtful material. It can be easy for people to dismiss games as a frivolous pastime until they take the time to think past the fun and see how they can inspire us to examine ourselves, issues of importance, and how we choose to live our lives. My thanks go out to all of you who wrote material for this issue. 

Please make use of the facilities at our web-site where you can rate articles, games, and do a whole lot of other things. Luis and Stan didn’t put all that effort in just to have the poles and surveys sit there. Also, they’re always eager for suggestions or comments on the site. This is your home on the information super-highway, blind gamers. Help it become a more lively place. Until next time at the end of August, I hope you all have an excellent Summer. 

+++ 
Letters: 

++ 
From Josh de Lioncourt: 

Hello all, 
I guess it is time to introduce myself more or less officially. You may have read my name in the most recent edition of Audyssey.  My name is Josh de Lioncourt and I'm currently working with PCS on an update of their classic Ten Pin game.  It has been a fabulous experience so far, and I hope to be bringing many games to the VI community in the future. 

So, here's a little about myself. I live in southern California.  I'm totally blind and live with my girlfriend.  I have two daughters (twins age 3) who are the most precious 
things in my life. 

I've been working in the adaptive technology area for a number of 
years...first with TVI and Humanware, and later for Marriott International, 
who employs a large number of visually impaired persons.  I was in charge 
of their "VI Program".  I maintained the computer systems and wrote Jaws 
scripts for their reservation software which was terribly inaccessible. 

Since a child, I've always been a musician.  I compose primarily, and 
prefer to work in popular music, which generally harkens back to the styles 
of the 1980's, a decade that i can't seem to escape...not that I want to, 
mind you.  My style is something like a mix of George Michael, sting, Elton 
John, and many many others. 

Another passion of mine is reading and writing.  I love science-fiction and 
fantasy.  Some of my favourite authors include Anne Rice, Stephen King, JK 
Rowling, Terry Brooks, Harry Harrison, and others. 

I'm also a fan of "Masters of the Universe" an epic fantasy.  I've enjoyed 
both the classic incarnation and the new revived version of this series 
which includes a highly-detailed sculpted action figure line (which I 
collect avidly), a cartoon series for both children and adults, and a comic 
series geared toward adult readers which I have read to me.  I'm a long 
standing supporter and message board moderator of 
www.He-Man.org, 
the site that is number one in terms of "Masters of the Universe" and am good 
friends with the site's owner, who also is incidentally the writer of the comic. 

In 2001, I produced a charity CD for "Hearts in Action", a non-profit 
organization that provided distractive entertainment to seriously or 
terminally ill children.  Sadly, the organization had to close its doors in 
2002 due to all its benefactors choosing to divert donations to victims of 
September 11th, a completely understandable but unfortunate side-effect of 
the terrible tragedy.  I hope that one day it will return to its work. 

I left Mariott just over a year ago to pursue more creative 
endeavours.  Something that i am far better suited for. 

Last year, I recorded a CD Single of some of my best songs, most of which 
I'd demoed over the last 12 years or so. 

And so, my love of creating stories, music, sounds, and programs has led me 
here.  This seems to be an arena extremely well suited to my passions, and 
I hope that I will bring many of you many hours of enjoyment through the 
games I plan to develop in the future. 

Have I bored any of you to sleep yet? 

Take care, 
Josh 

++ 
From Chris Bartlett: 

I've been reading the hot and heavy thread on games being released and I have been moved to write a warning. 

Let me begin by putting my biases on the table because they probably inform my judgments concerning the desirability of game complexity.  I am one of those  who lives on the end of the continuum that demands complexity and richness of detail in order to really enjoy a game.  I play Lone Wolf, which is at or near the top of the complexity continuum for accessible games at this time, and of all the games I have bought, it is the game I will continue to play for the longest.  Shades of Doom, while rich in detail provides fewer options for tactical thinking.  Trek 2K also fails to satisfy me because I don't like the interface or the way the game plays.  Alien Outback is enjoyable to me as a beer and pretzels game, but I predict that it will not hold my interest for very long.  These are the games I have purchased.  I have also downloaded several of Jim Kitchen's games, my favorite of which is actually Pong, (go figure.) 

I was troubled by things James North has said about the market not supporting large, complex projects like the Genesis Project, which is why he's had to concentrate on smaller, easier-to-develop games.  I get this, and am not criticizing him or any developer for choosing to create games on the simple end of the spectrum.  I am not criticizing those who derive enjoyment from these games either. 

What I am seeing however is that the contentment with games that are not comparable in complexity to games available to the sighted computer gamer is limiting the process of developing titles on the complex end of the spectrum.  I am selfishly saddened by this fact, because dammit, I want a game to lose myself in for hours, dealing with minutia, details and where one decision can effect my play an hour later in a way I might not have predicted.  I'm worried that the market is dumbing down the development of what would be for me better games. 

I don't know what to do about this.  Others have different expectations of a game, just as in the board game world where I'd far rather play Fighting Wings than B-17, or (if I could figure a way) The Civil War board game rather than the Gettysburg CCG.  Short of asking all of you to join me in my madness, I can't think of what could be done.  I don't have the time to develop my own game alone, and while I've had an interesting correspondence with David Greenwood, this is all still very theoretical and he has said nothing about going from discussion to design, let alone implementation.  (No problem David, you have enough projects and I had no expectations raised, just my appetite whetted. 
+ 
The topic presented here is certainly not a completely new one to the community. Thoughts about the kinds of accessible games available are many and varied. Charles Rivard wrote the following post which, among other things, complements the above posting to a degree: 

Terrible.  Replying to my own post??  Hmm.  Anyway, after sending it, I 
thought about how some people complain about the fact that there are so many 
games produced for the blind that are so much alike.  Some people say that 
there are too many shooting games.  Look at the subject this thread 
discusses.  While Nemesis Factor sounds a bit different, it does sound like 
bop it in a way.  Where did bop it come from?  The first game of this type I 
remember was Simon.  Then there is also bop it extreme which I mentioned in 
my last post.  All of these games are pretty much the same, yet they have 
been very popular with sighted and blind gamers.  Maybe what I'm getting to 
is that if a game idea works, I see no harm and I have no problem with 
several games that are along the same line.  Another readily available game 
is from Radio Shack.  I think it is called copy me or something like that. 
There are 4 buttons, each with a specific tone.  The game sounds 1 and you 
must match it.  The game sounds the same one and adds one.  You copy it.  It 
gets faster as you get a longer string.  There are 4 different games chosen 
by first pressing one of the 4 buttons.  It runs on 1 9-volt battery and 
sells for under $20 if I remember right. 

Editor’s Note: This post also illustrates why I appreciate it if people send formal reviews or announcements of games they know about in separate posts. It can be a lot of work to sift through all kinds of postings for information needed in different sections of the magazine. However, it also gives people an incentive to join the ongoing discussions lest they miss information that slips through the cracks between issues. 

++ 
Piracy has lately re-surfaced for another round of hot discussion. The prospect of ESP Softworks closing down and its games no longer being available for purchase seemed to act as a catalyst for both sides of the debate to speak up. Here is a small portion of the discussion still going on at the time of this issue’s publication: 

David Lant: 

Hi everyone, 

I'm writing to the list to announce that another set of registration keys 
for both GMA Games and ESP Softworks games have been found on offer on the 
Internet.  These are keys that were sold to individuals by the companies 
concerned, and are now being handed around for free. 

Let me make it clear.  Piracy is not acceptable behavior.  The companies 
know who these people are, and are perfectly within their rights to 
prosecute both the individuals, and the owner of the resource making them 
available. 

Just because ESP Softworks is closing it's doors for business, does not mean 
that they are relinquishing their ownership rights to the software it has 
sold.  If you have bought a game from ESP, you are *licensed* to use it.  It 
is still owned by ESP Softworks, and passing on your registration keys is 
still a breach of the license agreement. 

So please, will anyone who has been handing their keys around take this as 
fair warning.  If I find that any member of this list can be shown to have 
been pirating software licenses, I will be approaching the list owners to 
request that they be banned. 

I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly do not intend to overlook or 
tolerate this kind of selfish and insulting behavior. 

Yours in outrage, 

David Lant 

+ 
David has written numerous messages on the topic of piracy and has, I think, begun a very crucial development in the community concerning it. I think developers can take heart from the support list members have shown to David in his well-begun crusade on everyone’s behalf. Kirstan Mooney writes: 

    I just want to add here, I think David is an excellent Moderator and I 
would want nothing more than a moderator who actively seeks to stamp out 
Piracy.  I too would like to help stamp it out and will be doing my best to 
stop it. 
Just showing my support for David. 

+ 
Robison Brian: 
Good word David.  It is sad, but this does validate the practice of 
individual demo codes being used to create individual licenses keyed to 
each machine, even though it means another step in the registration 
process.  Anyone who has licensed anything from InspiredCode knows this 
is a quick and painless method.  In fact, the Audio Adventure Engine 
allows game authors to encrypt games and use an identical licensing 
mechanism.  (Just don't tell anyone the password you used to create the 
licenses you sell!).  If any game authors not using the Engine want to 
implement similar licensing mechanisms, please contact me off list and I 
can share with you the concepts involved. 

 
Editor’s note: People should be aware that developers are cooperating both to protect their own software and help others to develop protection methods. Personally, I’d rather see developers choose to cooperate to enhance accessible games and help new developers to learn the basics. It’s up to us to do whatever we can as consumers to be certain that honesty prevails and that people are compensated for their work. As editor of this magazine and a community leader, I’ll support whatever measures I can to stop piracy. 

+ 
Ryan Peach commented: 
You have no right to defame ANYONE regardless of whether they have broken 
the law or not.  This is a matter between law enforcement and the parties 
involve. 

If you want to do something about copyright infringement, get in touch with 
the authorities (as I'm assuming you have done) or at least in touch 
with their ISP's.  The punishment should fit the crime, and if the law 
chooses to publish the names of the guilty, then that is *their* right, not 
yours… 

A safe is only as secure as the next team to come up with a creative way to 
crack it.  It doesn't make it right to crack it, but to place total trust in 
the system is idealistic -your system will become outdate and someone will 
have found a way through. 

I realize that this is no justification, but with the announcement that ESP 
is folding, thus game support disintegrating, for pirates, it would seem 
like open season.  We should only be so lucky, David, that this isn't a 
larger market, or none of you, NONE, would've had their products out this 
long without them being openly pirated.  The fact that this has just come up 
now *might* suggest either: (a) the protection system is inherently flawed 
and needs review; (b) that the software in question is reaching the end of 
its profit lifespan; (c) both (a) and (b). 

I appreciate the offer to assist developers in developing encryption methods 
for their software.  Question: have you done any research into those 
protection technologies in current use that have a proven track record for 
success?  What about implementing one of them? 

+ 
Tom wrote: 
Hey all, 

Well I have been reading this thread over the last couple days with 
interest.  Let me say from the outset, this is going to be just a bunch of 
random thoughts on this matter and I have no clear idea yet where this 
message will lead me. 

First off, let me say for the record that I own legitimate copies of 
Grizzly Gulch, Hunter, Troopanum, and Dynaman.  I am seriously considering 
buying raceway, haven't decided on that yet.  Guess I'd better eh?  I have 
done some sound engineering for BSC Games as well.  In the last six or 
eight months I have gained quite a bit of knowledge from various sources 
including this list about how dedicated these developers we have are.  I 
understand what James is Saying, this is personal when you are talking 
about a market as small as this one is, and yes it is small.  First, you 
have to cut it down to the number of people who are blind.  Next, you have 
to reduce that further by the number of blind people who have 
computers.  Further, these computers need  to be new enough to run 
accessible games.  Also, the blind person has to be interested in games, 
remember, not everyone is.  Next, the person has to have the skills to 
learn to play the game in the first place.  Lastly, you have the matter of 
economics.  I don't know how it is in other countries but here in the 
U.S.,. the percentage of the unemployed working age blind is between 70 and 
80 percent, depending on who you ask.  Many of these people cannot afford 
to spend 25 or 30 or 40 bucks on a game, at least not very often.  All 
these things serve to narrow the market. 

Ok, so much for the small market thing.  Now to the piracy.  From a 
personal standpoint, I feel it is reprehensible to pirate these games 
particularly due to the small market.  Every copy of these games that is 
sold does make a difference.  Having said that, I also have to agree with 
the other list member who said that he doubts, and I doubt as well, that 
too many of us here are totally lily white as far as this goes.  I think 
most of you have probably copied something at one time or another, perhaps 
because you needed it and could not afford it.  This is my case and I 
freely admit it, if I really need something and the price is unreasonable 
and I truly cannot afford it and the only way to get it is to copy it, then 
I will do so.  However, I can say with a clear conscience I have never 
pirated any accessible games, nor will I do so.  These are a luxury item as 
far as I am concerned, and very reasonably priced at that.  If I like the 
game I should buy it, otherwise I should not waste the space on my hard 
drive.  These developers charge no more, in some cases less, for their 
products than games for the sighted.  We can go back and forth about the 
different kinds of games the sighted have versus what we have, but that is 
for another time. 

After this thread got started I have done some looking around to see if I 
could find any of these things that people are talking about, keys being 
passed around and so on.  I have to say I have not found anything of this 
kind yet, and this makes me question how prevalent this really is.  I 
realize that a lot of people probably do this personally, they just enter 
the keys on their friends' computer or whatever.  I agree with the general 
consensus, the only way you are going to stop this or slow it down is to 
make the keys machine specific as Justin does with the bsc games.  This is 
a pain in the butt for us owners, it also limits the market even more 
because many people simply will not go to the bother of doing this for what 
they consider a frivolous item, but I fully understand why he does it. 

The last thing I would mention is I would be careful about naming anyone 
you think is pirating stuff, particularly in any kind of public 
forum.  Unless someone has actually been accused and convicted of 
something, this could very well open you up to a libel and/or slander 
lawsuit, both personally and as an entity.  Now are most of these people 
who are doing this going to do that?  Probably not.  However it is 
something to consider before you act. 

Well that's all for me for now. 

+ 
Tim Chase wrote: 
There should be nothing as far as libel or slander goes.  Each developer 
who has distributed a software key to a customer should have records, 
matching keys to people.  If a person has given away their key, posted it 
on a website, or offered it around in any sort of public list/forum, it's 
a pretty no-brainer exercise to lookup the owner of that key.  I suppose 
it is plausible that the little computer elves peeked over a customer's 
shoulder and then scampered off to distribute the key they just watched 
the customer type in, or it could be a "friend" or family member.  None 
the less, when the license agreement states that the customer is not to 
distribute the key, it then becomes the customer's responsibility to not 
only to refrain from distributing it, but to prevent others as well from 
distributing their key.  Though I'm not on to care particularly for 
licensing headaches, it does pay my bills (fortunately, I work for a 
company that manages that headache) and pays the bills of many others.  I 
prefer to use free software to prevent selling my soul to some of the 
entities out there that wield too much power, but if you're willing to 
agree to a license agreement on its terms, then you ought best to abide by 
them.  Huzzah for the court system (grins).  You do have a choice...agree 
or not.  There are a lot of free packages out there, and a lot of free 
coding environments.  If you don't think it's worth agreeing to their 
terms, write your own and distribute it for free (winks).  My random 
ramblings... 

+ 
I couldn’t find anybody who openly supported pirates. However, the other side of the debate went more along the lines of how to deal with it and the market conditions which provoked it. Darren Harris’s message below gives a good example: 

With all due respect, and I really don't care how this is taken, good or 
bad, but it sounds to me like you are asking for a sympathy vote here. And, 
I don't know how many times we have herd the story about how this is a small 
market. It wouldn't be if it was better advertised now would it. How did I 
hear about accessible games? By word of mouth, nothing on any of the lists 
that I was on, no advertising on any VIP related websites or anything like 
that. If you want your products to sell, then you need to market them, not 
chuck them out with the "hope", that someone is going to buy them. You make 
it sound like this list is the be all and end all of the profit margins. 

And do you seriously think that Pirates are really going to listen? All they 
will do now is go deeper under ground. If your tactic really was affective, 
then Piracy would have been dead and long gone years ago. So that's 
testament to say that you can bluster about this all you like, but it's not 
going to get you anywhere. Yes Piracy is damaging. Yes it's illegal. But 
coming on, giving it the big all, really isn't going to improve things now 
is it? Do you really expect these folks to admit that they are Pirates? With 
all these programmes like Cazaa around now, there is no real way to prove 
who has got what. And no, I haven't got it either. I've got better things to 
do with my time than to clutter up my HDD with mP3's and other things. With 
a 500 strong cd collection and growing by the month, and yes I buy them, I 
have no need for MP3's. 

+ 
James North countered quickly with the following: 

Hi, Darren. 

With all due respect, you're way off-base where I'm concerned.  I'm not 
expecting anyone to come clean or change their ways.  If my post happens 
to make someone stop long enough to think about the issue--which is 
exactly what we're discussing here; nothing more, nothing less (you 
should know that)--then cool.  If not, big fawkin' *shrug*. 

It's a fact this market is small.  And, I've always been one of the few 
developers to claim that it was a viable market in which to develop full 
time.  And, I have. 

As far as advertising goes--I've done it.  If you haven't heard about 
ESP Softworks via this or the accessible gamers' list, then you're 
either obviously new or don't bother reading the posts.  I have 
distributors across the globe and not only do extensive marketing to 
individuals, schools, organizations, special interest groups, and lists 
for transacting products, but I've also spent an exorbitant amount of 
time, resources, and generosity toward the community and it's 
development outward over the past five years.  As far as 'spamming' 
every blind- and VIP-related list out there, it's by and large not 
welcomed by the moderators.  ESP products are featured on several 
distributors websites and, in fact, the only accessible game company 
features in LS&S Online's print catalog.  So, if you think that I view 
this list as the end all of profit margins and that I've merely chucked 
out hope to bring in sales--as well as looking for a sympathy 
vote--you're ignorantly wrong. 

There will never be an end to piracy (I suggest re-reading my previous 
post).  That's not the point.  The point is that I'll put foot to ass 
where I can to satisfy the fact that I can.  If you don't want my foot 
to your ass, then you'd better dig deeper because ninety percent of 
piracy is done on the surface. 

+ 
Charles Rivard wrote: 

Hey, David:  I know that games that I can play are being sold by some 
companies, but why the heck should I pay for them when I can get them for 
free from someone?  Heck.  It's only 1 copy.  They won't lose much revenue. 
It's no big deal.  I know someone who would really get a kick out of this 
free game I got from (fill in the blank).  I'll give him a copy to see if he 
likes it.  Of course, if he does, is he going to buy it?  Nope.  Why?  He's 
already got it.  Well, the loss of revenue has just been doubled.  This is 
why piracy must be stopped!!! 

++ 
Advertising and promoting awareness of accessible games was discussed at some length later on in the quarter. Mostly, this was done in a totally off-the-wall fashion. Thoughts of posters on busses, commercials for Audyssey Magazine, and other even more… well, let’s just say creative ideas were bandied about. Elaine Duke came through with some more serious thought on the problem of spreading awareness. Here is an excerpt from her message: 

From Elaine Duke: 

...but on my original post about posters, I actually meant for the posters to be printed.  then as has already been pointed out, if a VI person was with sighted friends they would point the poster out to the VI person.  how else do us blindies find out things in this world without someone telling us?  yes I know there's gadgets to tell us color, yes I know there's scanners to read print.  but, they can and will let you down.  somewhere along the lines you need sighted assistance. 

also you've other people who work with the VI communities, schools, parents, government bodies such as RNIB or CNIB in Canada.  sorry don't know the American equivalent.  but you get my point? 

now I'm talking free adverts here and I do know there are places like libraries for instance, who would and do put up notice boards free of charge. 

I personally feel that it's not just up to the developers to advertise their products.  but us as consumers too.  mainly because our community is so small. 

especially in the UK, accessible games aren't known at all or very few of us are aware of the market.  and why?  well advertisement!  you get the likes of comproom, yes, but where do they advertise?  in specialist magazines or programmes that only people who are aware of that programmed listen too. 

hmm, seems like a catch 22 situation to me, or maybe what came first the chicken or the egg? 

once again though, I feel we are back to the same thing, we need to help each other.  whether its developers helping each other, developers helping consumers or visa versa.  sorry folks it's just got to be done. 

you cant' have games with out the developers, but then you cant' sell games without consumers. 

right enough said. 

+ 
That’s exactly in line with my own perspective on this. I believe one of the key problems facing the growth of the market for accessible games is that relatively few people are aware that these games exist and of their potential to have positive effects on blind youth. Indirect advertising may prove particularly helpful. If teachers, parents, sighted friends, and agencies who are connected in some way with blind people knew about these games, things might start happening at a faster rate. Code Factory has managed to gain the support of ONSE, the Spanish equivalent of the Canadian CNIB. It would be good to see more developers backed by such organizations. I recently did a presentation for a youth group at the church Rebecca and I attend. The kids loved the games and I believe it gave them a more intuitive grasp of how blind people can use their hearing and that we can enjoy similar things to what they are interested in. Here’s a message from Michael Mccarty who is taking every action he can to spread that crucial awareness. I found it quite an encouraging thing amid all the gloom of the thread on piracy where it was placed: 

    Gentlemen, I am concerned with the great games of ESP disappearing, and 
not to be enjoyed by anyone in the future. 

    We have so few games, as has been pointed out on the list, and to loose 
these great titles would be terrible.  Is there a way to save these titles 
for future accessible game players?  What happens after the games can no 
longer be purchased? 

    I have done some presentations, the most recent at the Kentucky Council 
of the Blind state convention, where we gave away a computer, with demos of 
all the accessible games, from various companies.  It went over really well. 
Many did not know of accessible games for the blind, and were amazed to hear 
the quality of the sounds, and at the fun they had while playing the games. 
I would like to think that someone registered their copy of the games, I 
have no way of knowing, but games like Monkey Business, and Alien Outback 
are things that should not simply disappear.  The people love them, once 
they find out that they exist. 

    I have also done presentations for the Kentucky School for the Blind, 
and the teachers love the games, and see them as educational.  One teacher 
remarked that Alien Outback was a fun way for a child to begin to quickly 
respond to the sounds that come at them from different directions.  The same 
was said for Super Shot, proving that the games do have some educational 
value! 

+ 
Richard from: 
www.soundsupport.net 
related his experiences with getting publicity for Drive, their flagship game. It’s nice to see people finding ways to get the word out like these people are. Check out their site if you haven’t already. 

Hi... 

When we published the Drive Demo and the Sneller Demo we used a press release for each of them (English and Dutch). Of course this costs a lot of money 
(ranging from $500 - $1000 or more) . We didn't have to pay it ourselves (we couldn't if we had to!!!) but the Bartimeus Foundation and our University 
did. However, that's over 1,5 years ago and STILL we're receiving a lot of attention through that single press release. We reached the National Radio in 
Australia and Ireland, as well as a Las Vegas Radio show 
 and appeared in several Japanese Magazines (with Drive on CD). The last post about Drive being added to the Game On Exposition was also a result from the 
same press release. 
What we did outside the press release was to email every game group, website, newsletter we could get our ands on (so I agree we didn't get to email EVERY 
newsletter concerning the blind). We've contacted game magazines around the world, as well as audio designers and websites on sound design. 

The thing is, the press mainly wanted to give attention to Drive is because of the "News Value" of it (not because it is such an incredible racegame *grin* 
), the value being: "Racing Game For The Blind". We received so much feedback of blind and sighted people saying : "I didn't know this existed" that I 
understand your experience/opinion really really well, Darren. 
Basically, for us it was the same thing. We did a project on designing an accessible website and we decided to put some games on it to get some traffic. 
That's how we got to research accessible games. Otherwise I still wouldn't know and I'd be doing something else right now. And this was already a couple 
of years after Jim Kitchen originally created the first real audio racing game. 

So if you have the chance to use a press release (maybe get it sponsored by your local blind foundation or school or use a local newspaper, sometimes national 
newspapers pick it up as well), you might try it, it worked for us. Right now, "games for the blind" are very sexy for the media. 
Again, this is why I think (but this is only my opinion) there should be more websites on the subject and not just newsletters or newsgroups since they 
are NOT indexed by Google and other search engines.  But I'm glad I notice more and more people setting up their own websites who link to AudysseyMag.org, 
the developers, AudioGames.net and even refer this list. But I'm not a media expert. These are just my experiences. 
  

++ 
Games make wonderful gifts for blind people. Justin Daubenmire sent the following post to the list about how to go about purchasing one of BSC Games’s products as a gift for a friend. It would be a good idea for all developers to make such information available particularly when games aren’t available on CD and must be downloaded. For those interested, here is Justin’s posting on this: 

From Justin Daubenmire: 

Hi All. 

Just a quick post since I've recently had a few on the list email me about how to purchase a game from BscGames.com as a gift for a friend.  A list member suggested that I put this info on the site and share it with others.  I just updated my web site to show how to do this and wanted to share the steps with the list since I don't know how often people visit the BSCGames.com web site.  Here it is... 

Q) How can I order a game as a gift for a friend from your company? 

A) When you place an order for the game using our secure order form, in the product id box type the word "none" without the quotation marks and then submit your order.  After your order is processed, you'll be sent an email that states you did not provide your product id.  Hold onto this email and do not delete it since it contains a link to our website for the unlock code.  Email your friend and say "hey happy birthday or merry Christmas..." and have your friend download/install the game you just purchased for them.  Once your friend installs the game, have them email you their product id.  You then can go to the link in the email you were sent and paste in your friends product id.  When you are emailed the unlock code, simply forward the email/unlock code to your friend so they can input the unlock code and register the game.  Although this seems like a few steps, the overall process is actually quite quick and easy to do and we have a lot of people doing this all the time. 

++ 
From Tobias Vinteus: 

Hi gamers, 
If my memory serves me, the A2 emulator wasn't able to generate the castle 
disk for the Bronze Dragon game. I seem to remember reading on this list 
about another text-based emulator that actually could do this. What was 
the name of that emulator? 

+ 
Sorry to disappoint you, Tobias. However, to the best of my knowledge, no way was found to successfully play Bronze Dragon completely without sighted assistance. Apple emulators for Windows were able to generate the castle disk needed to play the game. However, without this step being accessible, it’s impossible to fully enjoy Bronze Dragon as a blind player. This is a particularly frustrating situation since the game is completely text-based and splendidly full of detail and replay value. I could get lost in that game for hours if it were accessible to blind players. However, short of somebody coming out with an accessible Apple II emulator which could generate these disks or porting the game system over to Windows, I don’t think we’ll ever be able to dig into it. 

++ 
Content over glitz was the name of one of the major topics of conversation over the past while. Chris Bartlet opened up a very large can of worms with the following: 

Why must we have yet another first-person shooter?  Why does the sound 
quality of a game merit more comment than the content?  This is not 
specifically aimed at Justin, and I'm sure that Void will kick butt in many 
other ways.  But why are we recycling twenty-year old games as suggested 
concepts for the next game?  Where are the games that challenge our brains, 
not our reflexes? 

I am not terribly interested in arcade games.  I want tactics and 
strategy.  I would far rather see heavy investment of time and effort to 
model something more satisfying than yet another variation on SOD.  Lone 
Wolf will always have more long-term playability than GMA tank Commander 
because it is a more cerebral and less reflex-oriented game.  I don't play 
SOD anymore, and Alien Outback is enjoyable but a beer and pretzels 
game.  I have not bothered with Monkey Business or Hunter, because I don't 
want to play another member of the species of game. 

There is so much more out there that could be done.  Why is the fixation 
for arcade-style games?  Is it the market not demanding anything more 
complex?  Is it a failure of imagination on the part of game 
developers?  Is it a wish to mimic sighted friends/relatives in the sort of 
mindless games they spend hours playing?  Why cannot we be more 
diverse?  What is the fascination with trying to reproduce the experience 
of a sighted 12-year-old (sorry Josh) when most of us are adults with 
brains and imagination enough to participate in something far richer and 
more complex? 
+ 
From Adrian Higginbotham 

Personally I find g.m.a games although in the arcade style require lots of strategy.  just because a game falls in to one genre doesn't mean it shouldn't be challenging on lots of levels, indeed if it isn't it's badly designed and likely to be boring. 
deciding whether to accept one challenge or another isn't really strategy, or not enough to keep you busy anyway, deciding whether the helicopter or the fast approaching tank is the more immediate threat demands much more strategy. 

+ 
Boomerdad wrote: 
I think one thing that rings true, especially for those of us blind since birth who have many friends who enjoy videogames, is the fact that this is all quite new. 

I can only speak for myself, but there has never been a shortage of "cerebral" games for the blind.  Text adventure games largely fall into that category, and those have been around for over 20 years.  I, for one, think reflex- and/or action-oriented games have a lot of lost time to make up. 

This isn't to say I don't enjoy the more cerebral games...but I'll admit, I'm a bit biased because I'm much better at the reflex-oriented games.  I don't think Monkey Business falls into the same category as something like Alien Outback or Tank Commander. 

+ 
Christopher chaltain chimed in thusly: 

I share Chris's frustration with the lack of accessible strategy games. From what I've read, I'd love to purchase an accessible game like this X-Beyond or X2.  LW is also my favorite game, and I'd love to see a LW like game with a space theme extended into an open ended strategy game.  An accessible version of Civilization or a sports game with a franchise or dynasty mode, like NCAA 2003, would also be tops on my list.  I'd be willing to pay significantly more for these types of games than the ones that are currently out there.  It's no reflection on the developers effort but just what I'm interested in purchasing. 

+ 
Charles Rivard wrote: 
All this posting about the fact that there isn't much in the way of different types of games that are accessible in some people's minds.  The complaint that there are too many shooting games.  A question: Are they selling?  If they're not, they will no longer be produced and other games will be put out.  If the shooting games sell well, they will continue.  If you see a game that you do not like, don't buy it and let the game developers know what you want in the way of games.  If enough requests are received, I would think that the games will eventually be seen.  All the one-man companies cannot obviously produce a game anywhere nearly as quickly as companies with hundreds or more employees.  That's why our market is not flooded with games.  I personally would like to see an absolutely accessible chess program.  Most of them have been fairly OK, but not fully accessible for all players.  I use a separate board and men to determine my next move, and some people say that this should not be necessary.  I would like to see more board games accessible.  Online card games as well, with the option to play against the PC when nobody else is available.  How many of those are there?  How about making the games that come free with Windows made accessible.  Heck.  Everyone has those games, but we cannot use them. 

++ 
All manner of games were discussed at great length as they emerged into public consciousness. Interest in accessible hand-held games seems to be experiencing a sharp rise from the occasional attention these games got in the past. In particular, a hand-held puzzle game called Nemesis Factor received an incredible amount of attention even after GMA Games put out a beta-test demo of their Tank Commander game. This demo effectively halted conversation about pretty much everything except itself and Nemesis Factor. Despite there only being one level to the Tank Commander demo, it kept a lively discussion going for weeks as people continued to play it. Also making noteworthy appearances on the Blindgamers list during this quarter were Monkey Business, Hunter, Pong, and a demo of Terraformers, a long-anticipated title gaining a lot of attention outside the blind gaming community. Despite a number of problems with this last demo, my take on things is that its release did more good than harm for the prospects of the full game when it emerges. I have every confidence that people will give it a second chance. 

Editor’s note: A tremendous amount of potentially helpful information was transmitted over the Blindgamers list during the last quarter. I doubt anybody would have the time to dig all those bits out and put them in a presentable format. I do my best to provide a good sampling of the more thoughtful discussion which frequently emerges. However, those not taking part in the everyday traffic on Blindgamers are missing out on a tremendous resource. People are usually quite quick to help out when information or assistance is needed. There is also a lot of friendly banter and the occasional heated debate. Every community has its good and bad points. However, thanks to the overall good nature of the people involved and our excellent moderators, David Lant and Brenda Green, the good points have far out-weighed the bad. To get more of a feel for what goes on in the Blindgamers list, those who aren’t already members may want to check out the Audyssey web-site. There, you’ll find an update composed by the site staff which captures the latest news and any currently hot topics.  

+++ 
Accessible Online Multi-Player Gaming 
By Justin Daubenmire BscGames.com 

Overview: 

I have seen it mentioned on the blind gamers discussion list about online multi-player gaming and have been asked personally by many gamers if I have ever had any thoughts on pursuing this endeavour. When I mention online multi-player gaming, I am referring to very large scaled games such as Sony Entertainment's Ever Quest. Have I thought of doing this flavour of game for the community? My direct answer to the question is yes! However, in this article, from both a developers perspective and a business perspective, I am going to explain to you why at this time, I feel it is an effort that may not ever work out. However, as the blind gaming community/market grows, and if we accessible developers team up to do the project, it possibly could. Let me encourage you to read this entire article so you can get an understanding of the costs associated with this type of entertainment. If you opt to not read the entire article I have written, please read the conclusion of this article to see my proposal to accessible developers and the community at large. 

This article is a general overview of the annual start-up costs to develop a multi-player online game. All costs mentioned in this article are in US dollars. They are rough estimates and have not been heavily researched. However, I do work in the e-commerce business as an internet programmer so I am somewhat familiar with this type of technology and some of the costs associated with it. Also to note, the fictitious online game I am discussing in this article is to be assumed to be a large scaled game and not a smaller scaled game. When I say large scaled game, I am referring to a game the size of Sony Entertainment's Ever Quest. 

Content: 

Many sighted people enjoy hours of playing multi-player style games online and with friends and family around the world. They grab an installation CD, install the game, jump on the net and fill out a subscription form. The form takes in name, address, credit card details, etc. After they subscribe for about 15 bucks a month, they dive into hours upon hours of game play with others world wide using their internet connection -- either dsl/cable/or even dial-up. Talk about lack of sleep! *smile*. I have seen several of my sighted friends enjoy some of the popular titles and I would love to bring that enjoyment to the blind gaming community. However, there is no way a single individual could ever put out an accessible multi-player online game such as the popular ever quest by Sony Entertainment. It would take companies like mine teaming up with others to produce such a beast for the blind. Reason? Funding.  

Myself and other accessible gaming developers have the skills and expertise to make online multi-player games. However, what we lack is what the major gaming companies have, funding and major amounts of it. They have an extremely large market.  

Lets discuss roughly what the first year would cost us to create the game. A robust online multi-player game would take nearly 1 year to develop correctly and would take at least a team of 4 programmers, 2 to 3 sound engineers, and a project manager, which is my expertise.  

Now lets dive directly into the start-up costs. You would need at least 2 game servers to handle the traffic. For a solid, reliable game server, you would be looking at spending $2000. Times that by two and you are already at $4000 start-up cost. Certainly you could throw together a few servers each costing between $800 to $1200 but I’m referring to what most major gaming companies would probably use -- state of the art server technology. In addition to the servers, you are looking at paying a solid $50 hosting fee per month to a reliable hosting company to host the two servers. I realize there are hosting services for about 20 bucks a month or cheaper but typically those services are shaky and unreliable and have serious

  
 downtimes. Also with a cheaper hosting company, you are looking at extremely limited bandwidth, which I will touch on soon. Bandwidth is one of the major cost factors. So, to be a reliable online multi-player game, you would need two game servers at around $4000 and $50 per month hosting cost, which is $480 per year. Looking at our annual cost so far, we are now up to $4480 without even starting on project development costs. 

Typically in most major programming companies they pay hourly wages to programmers/teams of programmers. Those figures usually are from $40 per hour of development to $75 per hour of development. To be extremely restrictive, I’ll say our team of accessible programmers only make $40 per hour of development for our accessible multi-player game. A rough estimation of the number of hours to develop an accessible “ever quest” style multi-player online game would be 300 hours to 3000 hours. So lets take the absolute barebones 300 hours of development times $40 gives us $12000 USD start-up cost for the development of the game. It would actually take much longer than 300 hours to make the game. Any gaming companies for the sighted would laugh at that $12000 figure since their development hours are four times that and their programmers make minimum $75 per hour. The $12000 development cost, larger companies would gross twice that in 1 month or less off their market of sighted gamers. Ah, market; we will soon discuss that as well. So the $4480 start-up server fee/annual hosting fee plus the initial programming fees brings us to $16480. Oh but hold on, we aren’t done yet, lets talk about the sounds for the game. 

In the real world, gaming companies have their own full-blown recording studios to produce game sound effects and have to pay their sound engineers some good change to make sounds. I.E bringing in people with specific accents to do voiceovers, making their own background music with real musicians, to simple things like making their own explosion sounds and death sounds. I’d say most major gaming companies probably spend around $5500 or more to hand create the sounds. We accessible gaming developers can’t afford that so we are left to CDs of sound effects. For a decent CD of professionally produced sound effects, you are looking at $400... price them online. Certainly you can find ones for $30 or $100 but are those really the quality we would want in an accessible online multi-player game? Probably not. I’d say in total we would be looking at paying probably $800 to $1000 for some great realistic sounds that immerse the player in the adventure whatever that might be. So, we’ll say $800 to play it safe. Now our start-up cost for the first year of operation is up to $17280 and we still have not discussed bandwidth costs, installation CD creation costs, CD shipping costs, marketing and advertising costs, nor how much to charge the end user monthly to subscribe to the service. 

Bandwidth is very difficult to judge in this effort since it is hard to tell how many people would subscribe to the accessible online game. The number of subscribers would determine the cost of bandwidth. Just a rough guess here but let’s say we have 300 die hard fan/gamers who sign up for the service and play a minimum of 4 hours per day. So, 4 hours a day times 300 users can get bandwidth usage up there quite quickly. So to be fair, I’d say bandwidth costs would be between $500 to $1500 per month. However, in real life they could probably be as high as $4000 per month since lets face it, many people stay on the computer for hours upon hours. I know some do not, but many do. Lets just say $500 to be conservative. So our annual cost to cover bandwidth would be $6000 ($500 times 12 months). Now our first year of expense would be up to $23280 without bringing into play installation CD creation/packaging, CD shipping costs, and marketing/advertising costs. We’ll let all those go but probably would be around $800 to $2500 or so. 

Now lets discuss our market – blind gamers. We all know that not only is the blind computer market a minority market, but to break it down even smaller, we are a minority within the minority – blind gamers. Sighted gaming companies could clear that annual cost of $23280 in one or two months with a single game. The number of worldwide subscribers they would get would bring them the funding they would need to financially clear their expenses in 1 or two months. After that, they would start to make them a serious profit. On the other hand, our market is very small. I don't know if we could break even and pay off the $23280 start-up costs in the first year of operation.  

Now lets touch on all you great folks -- us developers' faithful customers. You should know, we appreciate your financial support. Without it, we couldn't make games. Thank you for your financial support! Most sighted gaming companies charge from $12.99 to $14.99 per month with some pre-pay offers but for now lets focus on the monthly cost. Understanding that our overall market has limited funds, I’d say that most blind gamers would probably be most comfortable with paying $12.99 per month.  

So lets look at each person paying $12.99 per month to subscribe to the service to play our online accessible Ever Quest style game. Our initial annual expense would be $23280 and divide that by 1 user at $12.99 and you would get 1792 individual payments needed to clear our first year expense and break even. Now lets divide the 1792 total individual payments needed to clear our first year expense by 12 months and this will show us how many users would need to pay $12.99 per month for a solid year. And the survey says bing bing bing bing 149 users per month would have to pay $12.99 for 1 year to keep it afloat. Oops forgot to mention that out of that $12.99 credit card processing costs would probably take it down to $10.00. That 10 bucks would have to be split amongst 5 or 6 team members, hosting fees, bandwidth costs, CD creation/shipping costs, etc.  Also, not every person has a credit card so some would not even be able to sign-up and play the game. 

Although on the surface that looks somewhat doable and would clear our initial expense for the first year of operation, our second year of operation probably would kill us immediately. First of all, lets be honest, how many people would keep subscribing to the same game at $12.99 per month for the first year? I mean after all, there are only so many aliens you can shoot or lands you can cross or whatever it is before the game gets boring and you opt to not resubscribe to the game and then developers must hurry and try to make another online game that is bigger and better and has more features than its predecessor. Wow, that could potentially mean another $20000 and we haven’t even entirely gotten out of the clear with the start-up costs associated with the first game.  

Conclusion: 

Ok, now Justin shoves aside his pessimistic podium and gets rid of all reasoning. *smile* Now I put on my optimistic ball cap for this last paragraph. *smile*. could we do this folks? Would it be possible to make such a game be a success in our market? I say yes! All it takes is all of us banging our change together and making it stay afloat! We could do it but it would not be easy at all. In my personal opinion, the only way this type of entertainment could come to the blind gaming market is a team effort from accessible game developers. I'd be more than willing to head up such an effort and take on the role as the project manager. That's a strength of mine -- managing time, resources, people, etc. Everyone on the list knows that I meet my game release dates very close to when I say the game will be live for download/purchase. Sometimes there are unknown setbacks but overall, my games are released on or near the initial mention of the release date which confirms my abilities to be a reliable project manager. I am not bashing any other developers on the list, I don't know their individual situations or anything with their release dates, I am only referring to myself so keep this in mind. 

If there are any accessible developers on the list or off the list interested in putting together an online multi-player accessible game and would like to join the project team I'd head-up, please email me off list at justind@BscGames.com and we can start the ball rolling. Also, any gamers who would love to see this type of entertainment/game hit our market shoot me an email and let me know. Can't promise I can reply to all emails I get but it will more importantly give me a feel for how many would be interested in supporting this type of game. 

+++ 
Handheld Fun 
By Ken Downey  
Here are descriptions of all the handheld games I have ever played and 
found accessible, arranged by rating.  Some of these games are probably 
discontinued, but if you can find them I strongly urge you to get as 
many as possible as they are all worth playing.  I have rated them from 
1 to 10, 10 being the absolute best. 

The Nemesis Factor 
Hasbro has created a wonderful game called Nemesis Factor, a new puzzle 
that has stretched my brain to the limits.  Hasbro calls it the first 
electronic talking puzzler, and to my knowledge it is.  There are two 
new things offered in this game-- first, it delivers the mind-numbing 
challenge of solving 100 puzzles, and second it allows you and up to 
three friends to keep score.  The object is to solve as many puzzles as 
possible.  When they are all complete, whenever your friends press the 
colour you chose as your player colour, the game tells them you've won. 
This game is 100% accessible.  It is true that the puzzle involves 
lights, but they are not necessary for solving any of the puzzles. 
There are mathematical puzzles, pattern puzzles, musical puzzles, and 
so many more!  I've completed eighty-nine puzzles, having to skip some 
because of the frustration of not knowing how to solve them--but it is 
great!  Also be forewarned that many puzzles involve light.  The thing 
has a light censor just below the buttons.  It's a tiny round hole. 
The reason I'm telling you this is so you won't give up when you 
realize some of the puzzles hinge on light or dark.  By the way, you 
get two hints per puzzle, and you can skip one if you're stumped.  Four 
people can play, and it saves game play between rounds, so you and your 
friends can compare scores, and work on different puzzles in the same 
day.  Let your friend have one colour, you take another, and after the 
Nemesis factor has stumped him on puzzle 15 you can choose your coloured 
button and go right back to where you were on puzzle 69.  This is the 
best handheld game I've ever played, but it does have one drawback: 
there are only 100 puzzles, so once you've figured them out there is no 
challenge left.  Despite that, though, it still gets a solid ten. 

NuJam 

In this game, you have to follow the music.  As in the Bop it games, 
their is a steady, rhythmical beat that goes faster as you progress in 
the game.  So, the guitar plays a high note, and you slide the slider 
up.  It makes a low noise, and you slide it down.  It does a riff, and 
you twist it.  It plays a power chord, and you strum it.  This game 
plays way faster than the Bop it games do, and that in itself would 
make it worthy of purchasing today but there is a second game, Rhythm 
Jam, in which it plays a series of strums and riffs, and not only must 
you match them but you must do it to the rhythms in which they are 
played.  Want to know what the more advanced rhythms are like?  You 
don't have to beat it to find out, for their is a bonus jam mode in 
which, even if you mess up, it saves your score and position in the 
game (but does not save your score as the high score). 
There is also a free jam where you can just strut your stuff a little 
and make up your own sequences.  (This is great when you just want to 
mess around, after the game has blown out your brains.) 
For the partially sighted, there are lights on the game you can follow 
as well, but don't be distressed, you who are totally blind, for before 
starting the gameplay with your sighted friend you can tell the game 
not to light the lights. 
There's still more to this amazing game.  It doesn't just let you beat 
it once it's gone as fast as it can go.  For one thing, it doesn't 
reach a certain speed and then stop going faster like the Bop it games, 
it goes faster until you reach a certain place, then it tells you how 
well you did--but don't relax yet because it's time  to go double 
time!  You can also set the game to start at the doubletime speed. I 
don't know anyone who has beaten this fantastic zinger.  I give it a 
ten. 

Bird Brain 
Somewhere in the world is a man with a very obnoxious voice, and he 
imitates the speech of parrots almost perfectly.  You'd recognize his 
voice instantly, for he is a famous actor.  Anyway, in this game he is a 
bird that gives you seven phrases.  Then the phrases get all mixed up 
and you have to match the beginnings of the phrases to their endings. 
In the process of matching, you end up with quite a number of funny new 
ones,.  For example, "babe in the woods," and "blind as a bat," are two 
phrases.  If you match them up wrong, you could end up with, "babe in 
the bat!" 
I miss this game and would like to find it again.  It gets a nine. 

Real Fishing 

This is a great little game, especially if you like to fish but are too 
impatient to wait for a bite.  There is a motor in the game that pulls 
on the line so that the rod actually bends and it looks like a fish is 
fighting you.  Their are ten difficulty levels to this game.  You 
progress from level to level, and, for instance, once you have beaten 
level eight you can play all the levels accept level ten, which I have 
never managed to win.  If you're not quick enough to let out some line, 
you may have to tell the story about the big cyberfish that got away. 
I give this game a nine. 

Uno Blitzo 

This is a spin on the ever-popular card game, Uno.  Up to four players 
can play the game, or one person can play against the computer.  There 
are only four cards in the game, numbered red1, blue2, green3, and 
yellow4 for all four players.  The computer  calls out a colour or 
number, and whoever is currently playing lays down the appropriate 
card.  There is an uno button on top, and if the player next to you 
lays down the penultimate card without hitting that uno button, you can 
press the uno button, making him draw three cards, playing with a full 
hand.  Also, from time to time the computer will say "draw," in which 
case you can make either of your opponents draw a certain number of 
cards, which the computer announces after you've selected your victim. 
The game also will play a sound effect from time to time.  If it is 
your turn, hit the uno button.  On the first two difficulty levels, if 
you hit the uno button on the wrong sound effect you can pass, but on 
the latter levels you get another card. 
This game is almost completely accessible, especially if you play it on 
level 1.  On the other levels you have to take a card if you make a 
wrong move, and as sighted players can tell what cards they have left 
by the lights on their buttons, they instantly know whether to lay down 
the blue or pass, where the blind player does not.  Trying to 
concentrate on what cards have been laid, as well as which direction 
you have to pass when the game calls out, "reverse," can be a bit 
stressful--but I still recommend the game highly.  By the way, there is 
a trick to knowing what cards the computer lays down when you get an 
instant uno.  It leaves the highest numbered card left in your hand.  I 
really like this game, but since it's a bit difficult it only gets an 8. 

Bop it and Bop it Extreme 

Most people are familiar with Bop it.  It tells you what to do, such as 
bop it or pull it, and you do it.  The more points you rack up, the 
faster the games go.  Bop it Extreme is a bit more challenging than Bop 
it but it also goes a bit slower.  In addition to voice commands, both 
games have sound effects you can learn to follow.  To beat Bop it, you 
must score 100 points, and to beat Bop it Extreme you must rack up 250 
points.  These games are great until you have beaten them and the 
challenge is lost,  but though these games are relatively simple and 
mindless they  are still great fun.  I give Bop it a seven and Bop it 
Extreme an eight. 

Brain Bash 
This isn't just a follow the commands game, it also messes with you by 
making you solve relatively simple math problems on the fly.  The 
travel game version is better as the speaker is on top.  There are four 
games, and up to four people can play simultaneously.  This is an older 
game and may be discontinued.  I give it a seven. 

Brain Warp and Brain Shift 

Brain Warp and Brain Shift are relatively simple, but still fun, fast- 
paced games where you follow commands.  The game will tell you to 
turn/shift to a specific colour or number, and, when you do, you earn 
points.  In Brain Shift, their is a Simon-like game where it makes a 
bunch of sounds and you have to shift the stick to the right one. 
Brain Warp has a similar game, but it uses number-colour combos instead 
of sounds.  Brain warp  is a ball with six knobs, and you tilt it this 
way and that until the right coloured or numbered knob is on top, and a 
little ball in the game falls into a hole and you score a point. 
Another game is called Code Buster, in which the games come up with 
sets of four, five, six or more colours and you have to find the 
combination.  Other games include one where two or more people can 
play.  The first person selects a colour, then the second goes to the 
first colour and adds his own, and so on. 
but even after that they are still fun to play at parties and picnics. 
I rate them both a seven. 

There are many other accessible handheld games out there, like Simon, 
Supersimon, and talking Battleship, but they are so well-known that I 
have not endeavoured to cover them here.  As I get new games, I will 
play them, (for hours, no doubt,) and write a subsequent article 
describing them. 
By the way, "The Little Lost Puppy," is almost finished.  Go to 
www.dreamtechinteractive.com 
for details. 

+++ 
Enchantment’s Twilight Development Diary: Part III 
By Michael Feir 

Yes, folks. I came up with that title a while ago and still like it. Things have changed quite drastically over the past while. I got a copy of Dave’s engine and have started experimenting. Unfortunately, I get some runtime errors which have blocked me from making too much progress on that front. Over the next while, I’ll be trying to sort all that out. Mostly, I’ve been questioning Dave about his engine versus what kind of game I’m trying to create. Due to this and starting to work with the engine itself, I have had to alter my overall concept by quite a bit and may ultimately have to again. 

One of the hardest and most frustrating decisions I eventually had to make was to remove sea voyages from the campaign game. This had nothing to do with engine limitations other than the restricted number of user variables. It had far more to do with a simple question which I could not answer to my satisfaction. What would happen if the wizard was away on a voyage when this or that major event happened? Especially troublesome were events involving confrontation with enemies or demons on the island. It would require far more work and variables to have two systems to deal with these events, and I’d need to do that if the wizard could possibly be away when they occurred. Now, without sea voyages, I need never worry about the wizard being off the island. However, I still want to find a way of adding some form of explorational quest for the kind wizard to do in order to recover artifacts and especially the six keys to power. I’m thinking of having some sort of ethereal plane where the wizard must go and have adventures. These adventures might then result in an artifact appearing in a secret cave for the grabit to retrieve for the wizard. 

One of my main goals for the game is to have something which is infinitely replayable and which can go on forever. Due to the amount of randomness inherent in the game design, I’m not all that worried about having limited replay value. Objects and monsters can be located randomly and events can also happen randomly. Having things go on forever is a larger problem. Dave’s engine is designed for more linear games with different levels whereas I’m trying to have a game which all takes place in a single main level with occasional trips to bonus levels. At this point, it looks like I’ll be able to have something which goes on endlessly. Another thing I’ve had to do was determine exactly what each user variable was going to be for. During that process, I reconfigured the enchanted island to use up less variables and removed much of the resource management aspects I was originally going to have in the game. The overall focus has definitely shifted in the arcade action direction as it dawned on me how many variables I’d need to add the strategic elements I had in mind. My primary goal, after all, is to bring a kind of retro arcade action to blind people with an overarching long-term strategy element usually missing in those games. Despite the snags so far, I am still quite confident that I can ultimately deliver a game with real substance, good story, and replay value at the end of the day. A good part of this optimistic viewpoint is the number of times an aspect of what I was attempting to do seemed to be impossible at first. There have been many occasions where Dave has been positive something couldn’t easily be done only to later realise that it could be handled by his engine. He’s had to put in a lot of work modifying it in order for this to happen, and I appreciate that a great deal. One interesting stumbling block was that I wanted certain monsters in my game to be able to steal jewels and escape the cavern with them. At first, it didn’t look like there was a way to have them actually pick up jewels. The reasons for this are somewhat technical, and it kept him pondering for some time. Faced with possibly having to abandon this major aspect of my game, I had to come up with some kind of alternative. I had two possibilities in mind, but thankfully won’t have to lessen the game by using either of them. It turns out that it should be fairly easy to have monsters pick up jewels. Something still to be worked on, however, is having them be able to head for either the nearest edge of the play area or certain points on each edge. It doesn’t look like there’s a way to tell them to simply head for the nearest point on the nearest edge at this stage, so I’ll have to have paths for goblins to follow when they have jewels and happen to walk on them. 

By the next quarter’s update, I am hopeful that the major hurdles to starting serious coding of the game will have been dealt with. Having the engine has helped me gain a far better understanding of what is and isn’t possible. When my original ideas haven’t been possible, Dave has been quite good at either modifying the engine to make them possible or suggesting alternatives to consider which would be more within the engine’s capabilities. 

Over the summer, I’ll be mainly focussed on the voice acting scripts and story of the game as well as trying to test out and code basic game elements. I likely won’t have it all done any time soon, but would like to start recording the local talent I’m using during the Fall season. It’ll also let me have a better idea of how many other people I’ll have to find to do voices. I haven’t yet sorted out just how far I want to take things in terms of the number of different roles in the game. Obviously, I’ll need voices for the wizard, archfiend, elves, dwarves, city folk, and other inhabitants of the island. There will also be a number of evil villains for the wizard to contend with. Narrating events in the game which may not otherwise be detectable will be Adam Taylor. Those who have always wondered what the actual immortal gamer sounds like… may not get to find out since he’ll likely be using a more powerful narration voice. I’ll also be starring as at least one of the villains I’ve come up with. Ron Schammerhorn will also be doing some voice acting in the game. Some may have heard his talent in other games like Monkey Business. 

Sound effects are also proving to be a bit of a challenge. I’ve obtained a sound effects kit from: 
www.sound-ideas.com 
a good place for any game developer to check out if they can afford to spend money on sound. The way I saw it, I couldn’t really afford not to. It was either that or risk getting sued by somebody for using their sound. I still have to edit and often merge sound effects to get what I’m after, and I’m slowly getting better at doing that. Game design is something else again. I’ve been taking in a whole lot of very handy tips and information from another fantastic resource for game developers: 
www.gamasutra.com 
I’m eagerly awaiting their next audio guide for producing sound for games. Their previous one was quite a good read. They also have articles and other material from game designers which can be quite useful on the larger scale of things. I’ve had a clear idea of the game I’ve been trying to create since my initial stumbling onto its overall concepts. However, it’s always good to see what others who have succeeded professionally have to say about designing games. I’m trying not to take anything for granted including my ability to think of all possible angles while designing my game. 

+++ 
Adaptive techniques in difficulty management: 
Do they hold a prominent position in the future of computer gaming? 
by Robison Bryan 

Part 1. 

I will share with you my thoughts on the subject and let you decide for yourself.  Implementing these concepts could afford your games an almost human intelligence toward providing the best gaming experience for all concerned, for as long as possible each time they play, and for as many replay times as possible.  While I will try to be general about these ideas, I may use some language you consider to be a bit technical.  I'll also try to explain my terms in simple language, and you can also probably get most of it from context.  So if one thing seems odd, keep going and it should become clear.  And one last note: I am not an expert.  This is intended to be a theoretical piece, and reducing such to actual practice by necessity follows, rather than precedes such theoretical work.  With that said, here goes: 

What is your game's replay value?  Does it give certain people an unfair advantage?  You can control the answers to both of these questions by using adaptive techniques.  The two basic questions are answered by two basic techniques that use some of the same methods within them.  This article will deal with them in a purely theoretical sense, allowing you to utilize them in any language, whether C++, VB or PEAL (Plain English Adventure Language). 

+ Equalizer An equalizer is a method of anticipating and or detecting any unfair advantages the player might have, and adjusting the difficulty accordingly.  The most basic equalizer is a "set and forget" system, which is like saying you wind it up and let it run, instead of constantly taking measurements and adjusting it.  (Geeks like me would call this an open loop system).  The advantage of it is that although it compensates for certain prevailing conditions it allows the player to progress and reap the rewards of getting better without being penalized for ability. 

+ AutoLevel An autolevel is a system that reacts to its own output.  (Geeks like me would call this a closed loop, or servo system).  A perfect example of this is the automatic recording level (compressor) that many older tape recorders have.  You can hear the results of this during commercials on TV.  It keeps adjusting the volume so that the output constantly stays at the maximum allowable (yet annoying) sound pressure level.  The use of an autolevel in gaming can keep a player constantly challenged, but can also give them the feeling that they'll do just as well if they try hard or slack off. 

+ The Best of Both Worlds. 
By combining these two general methods together, you can get results that are much more fun than either method alone.  This becomes possible when you consider that difficulty in a game is not one dimensional.  You can have many kinds of settings in a game.  Just as you can have north or south, east or west and up or down, you can also have things like hot or cold, wet or dry, fast or slow and so on.  Each of these dimensions of possibility is called a parameter.  Your stereo has three parameters called volume, treble and bass.  In your game, you can set up and use a great number of parameters to control difficulty.  Certain parameters can be treated with an equalizer and other parameters can be treated with an autolevel.  You can even export the amount that your autolevel had to adjust things into another parameter so as not to lose the significance of the parameter that you squeezed with the autolevel. 

Here's an example of an autolevel that still manages to salvage something extra out of the fact that the player is really good:. 

+ The earliest, simple yet effective adaptive technique: increase the speed. 
Suppose your game is a first person shooter.  You can have the game adapt to the player's ability by making the enemies keep getting faster and more powerful.  But the player might say what is the point in trying when the game just compensates?  The answer is in the fact that the more powerful the enemy, the more points you get for shooting him down.  That way no matter how good or bad he is, the player stays on the edge of his seat in order to just stay in the game.  But his extra capability is rewarded by the number of points he racks up against the enemy ships, and perhaps by the ability to stay in the game for a longer total time each time he plays.  This is the most simple method of adaptive difficulty control, and was present in early games like Asteroids.  The enemy ships just kept getting faster, but the best players were able to stay in the game long enough to rack up the most points.  Even this simple approach has lots of replay value, because the player can stay in the game at first and eventually is so challenged that he falls out of the game.  Those are the advantages.  But the method also has some limitations. 

+ Dead heroes don't solve puzzles. 
Suppose you want to influence future text role play by the outcome of a fast paced battle scene?  Then it is not very convenient to guarantee that your player will die in battle either sooner or later, depending upon his ability.  Tron would never get to hack the operating system if he got killed on the game grid.  In the movie he actually ran away through a crack in the wall.  But if your player's text adventure character is someone else other than his battle character that might work out anyway.  An example of this would be if in the story the player were controlling a fighter robot by remote control.  Two more examples would be Angels fighting demons overhead on behalf of the praying player, or else a general dispatching troops who can win or lose the battle by various quantities of casualties.  The above technique is not the only way that a game could adapt to the player's ability.  This method also adapts in only one way, that of speed.  Thus the person with the fastest reflexes will more often win.  Also it gives an unfair advantage to the player who can visually see the enemy.  Furthermore, since the player temporarily becomes someone else for the duration of the lethal battle, you could not really call it a first person shooter in the truest sense of the term. 

+ Better adaptive techniques needed. 
It can be seen from this that to successfully mix first person action with an ongoing puzzle, text adventure and or mystery saga, what is needed is more detail, more intelligent control over the difficulty level, without sacrificing the rewards obtained by playing well.  The player must get a sense of reward that is proportional to his progress in how well he plays.  I had at the beginning of this paper talked about two basic techniques, the equalizer and the autolevel.  The space invaders approach is almost entirely an autolevel.  The game reacts to how long the player stays alive by compensating with faster enemies.  Only the number of enemies shot down preserves for the player the benefit of how well he plays.  The simplicity of this approach also can allow certain players to leverage their own advantages, fair or otherwise. 

+ The simple equalizer in action An equalizer can be used to compensate for a certain specific known advantage.  For instance, what if you wanted to write a game that the sighted and the visually impaired would find equally challenging.  To provide the stimulation of all senses available without allowing the presence of certain senses to yield an unfair advantage requires an intelligent method that does not give the visually impaired player an easy way out or the baby treatment, either.  The simplest way to do that is to honestly evaluate what areas the sense of sight yields an inappropriate advantage.  In other words, which of the game's parameters are influenced by the presence of that sense.  Then to the appropriate degree, adjust those parameters to compensate.  The result is that if the sighted player were to turn off the visual display and he would rack up the same number of points, or gain the same measure of success, whatever the challenge is.  This is a simple "set and forget" concept. 
The steps are simple. 

1.  Determine whether the sense of sight is being used. 
2.  Have a preconceived notion about which game parameters are affected, and how much, by this sense. 
3.  Adjust the difficulty settings along those parameters in the opposite direction by that said amount, before any playing has even occurred. 
Thus the outcome will be similar whether or not the sense is used. 

But this is not the only possible source of excessive advantage. 

+ Compensating for various kinds of individual strengths and weaknesses As previously mentioned, a player might have lightning fast reaction time.  If the only way to influence certain adventure details is by means of how well he does in battle, the more normally paced players may never get to the place where their analytical skills would pay off for a more consistent challenge all around.  Likewise if the lightning fast player is not a Sherlock Holmes by any stretch of the imagination he may never get to the battlefield where he could show his stuff.  Rather than insisting that the player be good at everything in order to really enjoy any of it, it would be helpful to allow the player to progress using what he has more or less successfully, by the outcome of his labours in any endeavour (whether on the battlefield or on the beat as a detective) 
would yield quantifiable rewards that can be leveraged to his benefit when he is challenged in his particular area of weakness.  For those players that are not very good at any of it yet, there can be different general difficulty levels that can be selected from the menu, such as bantam weight, lightweight and heavyweight.  Any scores would be within that particular difficulty group or weight class and would be understood to apply to such.  But getting back to the adaptive aspect, within each difficulty class, the different parameters of a person's ability should be compensated so that he can stay in the game and get a sense of his own improvement overall. 

+ A new fly in the ointment Before proceeding to describe how to compensate for many parameters at once, there is another aspect that should be considered, as it will have to be dealt with at the same time.  The new consideration is the answer to the first question at the top of this paper.  What is your game's replay value?  This is best answered by making the very structure of the game different every time it is played.  This can be accomplished by allowing random numbers to dictate the generation of maps, of locations, of tools, of monsters or any combination thereof, as well as all of the properties of such items.  I recognize that it is a good thing also to save a game that is in progress and continue playing it later, much as one would put down a great novel and continue reading it later.  I will ignore the mechanics of doing so and consider such to be merely a continuation of the same playing of the game. 

+ Let the numbers decide In order to accomplish this versatility, as well as to adaptively control difficulty, everything in the game must be controlled by variables.  Rather than having a monster always living at a certain precise location, and behaving in exactly the same way each time you encounter him, it would be better to assign details according to variables that are modified by rules of logic that depend upon arbitrary numbers, and then seed them with random values.  If there is no way around certain preset values, then have a table of all such possible preset values that you can assign, like a spread sheet.  Then have a variable index each dimension of the array and the result that gets grabbed from the box at that address will decide how to make the world you are setting up.  In this way you can create a number of monsters, enemies, towns and even situations the player may encounter.  You can specify their personalities and write in plenty of detail about them as text.  Thus the descriptions can be quite vivid, complete with behavioural tendencies and detailed kinds of capabilities to match, while at the same time never being expected by the player.  The unpredictability can also be enhanced by mixing and matching whenever possible, assigning certain attributes randomly from each list, complete with detailed descriptions of just that attribute.  A different random number would select a different detail from each list. 

+ An example of replay variety that points to difficulty management For example, your monster might be randomly issued a weapon from a list of twenty possible weapons.  There is detailed description of what the weapon looks like, what the damage it does looks like, and there could even be wave files associated with the firing of it.  Furthermore, the weapon could have rules associated with what it can and cannot harm, as well as what kinds of defence are effective against it.  Additionally, any time numbers are used in the weapon's details there is an opportunity to modify them by random and or adaptive means.  The random means can help to make each monster truly unique.  The adaptive means brings us full circle back to the topic at hand.  Every number involved in the details of a monster can have an effect upon how difficult he is for the player to deal with.  For every monster, each of those numbers can have an allowable range, which is how far the number can be stretched in either direction.  This allows the monster to retain his personality.  It is also possible to specify that for a given monster if one of his numbers gets stretched in one direction, a different one of his numbers will be stretched in the same or opposite direction, whatever will allow him to be modified in difficulty while maintaining his unique personality. 

+ Parameters of Monster Challenge After a number of potential monsters have been created, they can be classified according to type and difficulty, by prediction and or testing.  Their unique qualities will present varying challenges to various players.  Player 1 may have more trouble with Monster A rather than Monster B.  Player 2 may have the exact opposite experience.  He may find that Monster B is more difficult than Monster A.  All things being equal, why did one player have more trouble with one Monster while the other player had more trouble with the other monster.  Each player thinks that his favourite monster is simply tougher.  What accounts for this difference?  The difference is that the monsters are not the only ones that have different parameters and aspects.  The players are also unique monsters in their own rights!  Each player is stronger according to certain parameters and weaker according to other parameters.  It is as if the aspects of each human player were also randomly selected from a table, complete with detailed descriptions and number ranges.  This may be LOL hilarious but it is also true.  Each person is not only uniquely responsive to various monsters, but also to various other kinds of challenges or partial aspects of challenges. 

Having carefully set the stage in Part 1, I will share in Part 2 my own proposed integrated approach to accomplishing near infinite replay value and adaptive difficulty management within a multi-mode game. 

+++ 
Free Game Winner 

Sean Randall wins the free game for this quarter for his reviews and efforts on behalf of blind gamers. He also participated in many discussions on the Blindgamers list. This time around, BSC Games has sponsored the free game. Congratulations, Sean. Don’t forget to contact BSC Games to claim your prise. 

 
+++ 
News From BSC Games: 

The Future of BSC Games 

Greetings Gamers! 

For those of you reading this who may not know me, my name is Justin Daubenmire and I own www.BscGames.com. I am an accessible game developer and I love making games for the blind! With that said, a lot of change is going on at BSC Games so I wanted to share with you some of these changes. Recently, after joining the blind gamers list, I have found out that gamers want more genres of games from developers. I'm certainly well known for arcade action games -- producing titles like Troopanum, Hunter, Pipe, and some educational games. After hearing the desires of the community on the BG list, I have decided to refocus my company and the types of games I produce. 

In the future, BSC Games will be creating various styles of games. Ranging from first person shooters, to strategy style games, to simulation style games, to mention a few. However, I still have plans to put out an occasional arcade or educational style game since many enjoy them. 

With producing larger style games, like first person shooters or strategy games, this has also encouraged me to redesign our game engine. These styles of games need richer content across the board including 3d sound and 3d movement. So, Igor and myself will be redesigning our 2d game engine to be a 3d sound/movement game engine. We have already started with this and it is progressing nicely. For those programmers interested in what we are coding the engine in, the engine will be written in c++, c#.net to be specific, and should yield some good code execution. Hopefully. *smile* 

Some, but not all, future titles from BSC Games will have 3d sound/3d movement in them if we feel it is appropriate. Some games we may just produce using our 2d engine. It just depends on if the project really requires the rich 3d sound or not. I.E if we do an accessible Dig Dug arcade style game, for example, I don't think that would merit 3d sound but an accessible jet fighting simulation game certainly would. 

In our new 3d game engine, we are hoping to put the ability in to use DirectPlay, the networking component in DirectX that lets you multi-play with other gamers online. You know folks, I'd love to develop accessible games full-time but it just wouldn't feed my family and get me a case of diet Pepsi once every 1.5 weeks. LOL But seriously, Igor and myself both work full-time and have families to raise, time is a resource that is limited to us as is for most accessible developers. However, I have a goal that really would require a lot of time -- being the first company to bring in multi-playing to the BG community. Let me rephrase that, specifically a multi-player first person shooter using DirectX and DirectPlay technology. To be honest though, if it is not me, that is ok, but it is a goal I am after. It currently is a dream, due to time limitations, but lets hope it could be a reality for the future. 

So what games are in the making over at BSC Games? Well, me/Igor are working on our first 3d sound game called Operation Blackout. It actually will be an arcade sort of game with 3d sound. We are hoping it will not be the true sense of an arcade game and will bring some further content to the table. Operation blackout is giving us the ability to transition our current game engine into 3d sound but not 3d movement. We do have a game starting production in the near future called the void that will have both 3d sound and 3d movement in it. 

So what is Operation Blackout all about? Jump in your apache helicopter and fire it up. Take off and communicate with your base as you attempt to narrow in on the coordinates of one of your recently overtaken military bases. If you are lucky enough to avoid all the enemy fire by using your radar and weapons, actually locating and landing at the overtaken base, your mission has just begun! You are in a special operations unit and have been chosen to fulfill this operation yourself. `Simply put, find the terrorists, eliminate them, snag your homeboys, and blackout the terrorist operation. Thus, operation blackout. Operation Blackout will have lots of 3d sound and fighting and other bells and whistles in there so stay tuned. I'll post more info about it as me/Igor get further with it. Customers who do not have surround sound speakers will still be able to play the game. 

 

Another game I have in the making is called the void. It is not being coded yet at all. I am developing the story line with a game storywriter that I have contracted with. It is going to be the largest game I've ever done. The blind gamers list has been packed full of posts about the void. Initial brainstorming for the game was opened up to the community. Many on the list offered great suggestions for the game. It was a really fun time for everyone involved. A developer listening to consumer input. Wow! It was awesome folks! Thank you for all the awesome input you folks offered. I'm taking a lot of it to the table and will get some of the content in the void you are wanting. Such a wealth of talent out there man. It's exciting!  

For those reading this for the first time, as explained on the list, I wasn't taking exact suggestions for the game but was looking for concepts to extract from the suggestions to put into the void. I want to get some of the content all of you are wanting in a game into the void. I.E if a person suggested that you pick tulips and eat them to survive, I looked at the concept of eating and would use the concept of eating in the game. Not saying eating will be in the void, this was just an example of how I am using the suggestions people offered. No one really suggested eating tulips LOL, I'm just letting you better see where I am coming from when I say I primarily extracted concepts from suggestions. The void will be a 3d sound and 3d movement first person shooter that promises to bring a lot to the table. I personally feel it will set a record for BSC Games as being the best title I've done yet. I posted a description about it to the BG list so here it is again… 

It's a first person shooter that will be packed with advanced sound imagery. You'll find yourself and your ship docked at the last remaining human starbase that hasn't been completely overtaken by The mysterious and deadly alien race called the Void. 

The starbase, at one time, was a marine outpost that was in charge of monitoring interstellar travel among the outer worlds. You'll immerse yourself in several back-to-back missions using modern next-gem weaponry and systems to try to seek and rescue the remaining marines and return them safely to your home world of alpha12.  

 
And more in the news at BSC Games… another game? Another game in the making? Yuppers. Well, for those troop fans; troopanum v 2.0 is in the making! Daniel Zingaro is on break from university and has contacted me about doing v2.0 of troop. I toss him some ideas, he comes up with some, and off he goes coding it. It promises to bring a lot of fresh content to the game and we think you all will like it. There is no projected release date for it at all but it will have some really cool additions to it so stay tuned for this upcoming release. As we get further with it, I'll post some information about it. I'll be releasing Operation Blackout, then Troopanum v2.0, and then work will actually begin on the void! As always, I'd like to say thank you to all of you for your faithful support. I appreciate it! 

Best wishes 
Justin Daubenmire 
www.BscGames.com 

 

 
+++ 
News From ESP Softworks: 

Dear Customers, 

Please note that it's been decided that the ESP Softworks Co. website 
shall remain open until the release of both ESP Raceway and ESP Pinball 
2.  Demos of both games will be available for a limited time thereafter. 
For those who weren't able to place orders yet, you may still do so 
while the website is available. 

We appreciate the comments, suggestions, and well-wishes that have been 
extended in the past month and will miss greatly the opportunity to 
serve the accessible games market once the current development queue has 
been completed. 

To show our appreciation, we will be releasing a final freebie for your 
download (to be announced). 

In other news, the ESP Pinball 2 beta testing program will be announced 
shortly and the ESP Raceway beta team will be opened up once again for 
applicants.  More news about this soon. 

Release dates are currently still speculative at best.  Everyone will be 
notified when the releases are about to occur as well as when playable 
demos are available. 

Best wishes, 

James R. North, President 
ESP Softworks Co. 

 

 
+++ 
News From GMA Games 

We have just released a generally available demo of our upcoming GMA Tank 
Commander. Try it out and let us know what you think. It is a beta, but we 
are still making changes based on the suggestions we receive. We hope to 
release the full version before the next issue of Audyssey. 

GMA Tank Commander puts you in the seat of a modern day tank. You have two 
types of shells, two types of missiles, and an armour-piercing machine gun to help you complete your missions. The game uses surround sound to create 
the realistic environment of a battle command. This may be the best 
accessible game of 2003! 

A new version of Trek 2000 has just been released. This brings us up to 
version 5.1. Although Trek 2000 is the oldest game in our fleet, this new 
version includes many changes that should renew or surpass the excitement 
created during its initial release. The Major changes include much smarter 
enemies and the ability of your star bases to fight back. 

You can find out more at: 

http://www.GMAGames.com 

 
+++ 
Update on Robison Bryan's Audio Adventure Game Engine 
by Stan Bobbitt and Robison Bryan 

Last fall, in the thirty-fifth issue of Audyssey magazine, I interviewed prolific programmer Robison Bryan concerning a concept for a self voicing adventure game engine that he had begun work on. This audio game engine is unique because of the simplicity of the language, its ease of use, and user friendly interface.  Robison set out from the very beginning to make this game development tool as easy to use and as accessible as possible, yet be able to create complex games.  He has also been very open to suggestions and advice from many members of the blindgamers list since day one. 

In the short few months since its inception, the game engine has certainly come a long way.  Especially considering that Robison is only a one-man operation. 
The beta version is now available and Robison has set up a discussion group for the beta testers. 

----------------------------------------- 

Following is a report from Robison on where the engine stands to gamers. 

In our interview on Nov 25th, 2002, Stan Bobbitt asked me some great questions and reported the best answers I had at the time.  Since that time, numerous features and capabilities have been added to the Engine.  At the time of the interview, I had expressed certain limitations for the Engine.  After some hard work I have done away with a lot of those limitations.  To get the full scoop on all the cool new things in the Engine, please see my site: 
http://InspiredCode.net/Adventure.htm 

Here are the main limitations that no longer apply: 

+ Powerful yet intuitive math added 

I had said that the math would have to be simple. 
Now, the math can be as elaborate as you like. 
The Game Engine contains an extraordinarily talented Expression Evaluator that likes to eat up the craziest equations you may want to throw at it, and gives you just the answer that you would naturally expect.  It is very intuitive and easy to use. 

+ "Advanced" type Programming Tools, yet still in plain English. 

I had said that there was no advantage for the advanced programmer.  The thing that made those really hard programming languages so great to use was all the powerful features and capabilities.  Now those powerful abilities are available to you in plain English. 

+ Background Sounds and random soundscapes 

I had said that the best I could do for sounds was to give the ability to loop a longer wave sound.  Now you can create audio sequences made of midi and layered wave sounds, creating realistic, non repeating textures of sounds. 

+ Shareware Authors can powerfully protect their work 

I had said that the best I could do was to provide a check sum to verify authenticity.  Now the engine can protect your program code's secrecy.  You can encrypt your game files, and they will play just fine encrypted.  Unregistered users can play your game for five minutes at a time (or any other time period you specify) to try them out, but to keep playing for more than those minutes they have to register. 
When they register they will send you their demo code and you can send them their permanent code for the game. 

If you want to keep your games open source, however, you can still authenticate your work as well as letting people learn from you. 

+ NEW: 3D Navigation and collision detection I couldn't resist adding something really important to the Engine.  As a result the public beta date was pushed forward just a little bit...  ok, a lot. 

A powerful real time gaming mechanism has been added that you can use to allow the players to navigate with (keys like) 
a joystick, encounter wandering monsters, have access to rooms if doors are open, bump into walls, fly over but not into buildings (except perhaps through a window) and have aerial dogfights like fighter jets or even play a good game of quiddich on broomstick. 

That makes it possible to have an audio text adventure mystery game with some intense action scenes along the way, what I think is the best of both worlds.  (Of course, if all you want to do is the action you can do that too.) 

You will find most of that stuff at the end of the language document, starting with "+++ Real Time RPG Motion". 

The radar, compass, flight instruments and other noise makers are made of functions written in the language, so they can be modified and or replaced by the author.  That should also ease the transition to the DirectX version when it comes out. 

The language supports several simple ways to set or change the player's (and other objects') position, orientation and movements, either in an absolute sense or in terms of the directionality experienced by the player however he may be facing.  It lets the player steer and move like a car or jet, and you can let the Engine worry about untwisting all the directions, and whether the movement finishes or gets stopped by bumping into something. 

The first release will definitely be a beta version, since the program is already well over ten thousand lines of code and I am the only one working on it. 

+ AdventureEngineBeta group 

As the purpose of the Engine is to empower a new community of game programmers, each of you is just such an expert who can make a big difference by your testing and feedback. 

Since there are so many people deserving and qualified to be in on the beta release, I have decided to release a public beta that won't expire for months.  I will appreciate all the help I can get in testing it under various conditions.  That way I can get this into your hands sometime this year! 

The address of the BetaGroup is 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AdventureEngineBeta 

+ What is the present status? 

What it's come down to is loose ends.  I've just finished coding the main navigation and collision.  It turned out to be a huge mass of integrated code with major steps taken to optimize performance throughout.  That includes player movement, automated routes of wandering monsters, determination and detection of collision, monsters giving chase, players wandering into new locations when allowed by access or else collision (bouncing against walls) otherwise, collision angle (for accurate bounce sound panning), among other things.  Still to be coded are the hit-miss detection of weapons extension, radar, instruments, bounce and new location noises and other loose ends. 

Once the last of the coding is done, I'll test each of the routines, run some simple game files to test certain aspects, and then post an alpha. 

The alpha will not yet have the ability for the player to save paused games.  Once I have fixed all the things you folks find in the alpha, then I'll make up my master list of all the things I have to save to disc so the player can save and resume partially played games.  That approach will save a lot of time by my not having to keep rewriting the SaveGame routines. 

+ What lies in the future? 

Because of the user friendliness of the language, the time table for the wizard has been pushed rather far into the future.  The next major focus will be to create a body of tutorials, instructions and examples on the web that will enable anyone to almost instantly master this language.  But before that, we still need to finish beta testing this thing to life, going from the simplest commands and moving out to the most complex, making bug reports and posting updates as needed throughout.  In a manner of speaking, our beta testing forces have securely taken the beach and are now hacking our way into the jungle. 

----------------------------------------- 

Hi, Stan here again: 
In closing, I would like to say that I am impressed with Robison's work so far.  I am a member of the beta test team, and I must say that I'm excited about this game engine! 
I have done a bit of programming in the TADS language, which is similar to (C) and have even come up with a couple simple games, but the language for Robison's engine is so much easier to understand and work with that there is hardly any comparison.  In the words of another beta tester, "this language is straight easy, right out of the box!" 
Check out the beta page at: 

http://InspiredCode.net/BetaPage.htm 

I can see that this is going to be a powerful game development tool, and will indeed be what Robison Bryan set out for it to be: 

"A self voicing game engine that will enable any and every user to create their own good quality games; A programming language that is so straight forward that anyone could read down through a source file and understand how to modify it; A wizard that will converse with the user to create a new game within this easy to understand language" 

 

 
+++ 
News from PCS Games 

Hi Folks, In brief, this is a sneak preview of coming events, with several games in production but no fixed release date on any of them. 
+ GMA Tank Commander Phil Vlasak is working on the sounds of GMA Tank Commander and sometimes goes to bed with explosions and the Ride of the Valkyries echoing through his head. 
What is GMA Tank Commander, you may ask, This is an accessible Windows game, where you can blast Your enemy to Pieces! 
In the world of armored warfare, a tank commander's split-second decisions can make the difference between life and death. 
This exciting Tank Simulation is no different.  All the action happens in real time.  Unlike other strategy games, there are no turns - only furious, lifelike combat.  It's fast, fun and easy to start playing.  But it's so addictive, you won't be able to stop. 
Full surround sound makes you feel like you're really sitting in a modern tank in the middle of the action. 
So, put on your helmet, and battle to the death against the enemy. 
For more information and to download the beta demo of this game go to GMA Games. 
www.gmagames.com + We'll now give you a peak at the development of a new game. 

Phil Hi Justin I created sort of a duck hunt game from your Bobby's Revenge by changing the sounds to have ducks flying by instead of Santa. 
I had two ideas about it. 
First, it could be developed like my Duck Hunt game so that when you hit the duck, it doesn't continue across but if you miss the duck it does. 
You still won't aim the gun.  The duck flies over you and your gun shoots directly upwards from the center. 
And you'll get one chance to hit the duck each time it passes over. 
My second idea is that This could be a free game with credit to you and me.  We can give the game to schools and commissions for the blind so they can have something fun for their students to play.  And like TV shows, which you get free entertainment at a cost of watching or listening to the commercials.  The end credits would be a commercial for PCS and BSC games. 

Justin Sure, that would be cool.  Before releasing it, did you want to let the duck fly off the screen if you miss it like you suggested? 
Do you get 3 ducks to fly off the screen before the game ends? 
Do you just keep earning points each duck you shoot in an attempt to rack up as many points as possible before 3 ducks fly off the screen?  Let me know what new features should be in the duck game and I can see if I have some time to fix the program. 

Phil What should we call it? 
Shades of Duck? 
One flew over the Duck's nest? 
All the President's Ducks? 
Apocalypse Duck? 
Lose Your Duck? 
Duck Business? 
Duckanum? 
Puck A Duck? 
Duck Talks? 
Duck gone it? 
Faster than a speeding Duck? 
The Duck, Reloaded? 

Justin How about, duck hunt? 
hunt for duck? 
duck splatter? 
bullet of duck? 

Phil Since I already have a DOS Duck Hunt game, I didn't want to use that name again. 
Someone suggested Elaine's Revenge. 

Justin No Kidding, I can guess who. 

Phil Ya, she's trying it out but I think it's giving her a head ache. 
I got it! 
Why don't we ask Elaine? 

Justin Geesh, that's a lot of pressure to put on one person. 

Phil Ya, I guess so. 
I've created wave files using the A T and T British Charles voice to do most of the talking in the intro and end.  I've also used it for the numbers and points. 
When I put it all together, it all sounded great, except for some of the duck quacks, so I'll be changing a few of them to work better. 

And by the way, I thought of the title, Quacker Blaster. 
What do you think of it? 

Justin LOL I love it!  quacker blaster it is! 
BTW I think human voice overs for the score speaking sound a little more understandable but that is just my personal opinion. 
This little game will be cool.  BTW were you able to beat the game with 55 

  
ducks and the ducks being a little faster? 

Phil No, my highest score was 40 ducks but I think there are those out there who have faster reflexes than I do so I would leave it like it is. 
I do think we should warn those who didn't like Bobby's Revenge that this is another novelty game and nothing more. 
I went through the comments on that release and think we should say that they may have fun for about thirty seconds.  In fact, it probably will take longer to download the game than the amount of time they'll get any enjoyment from it. 
On the other hand, that doesn't mean it's not a good game if you just want to blow a few minutes while you're waiting on something or just have nothing better to do.  Or you just want to procrastinate but can't afford to do that for too long. 
It wont cost you anything but time to download, and it won't be as detailed as games you pay 30 to 40 dollars for. 
So for those who didn't like Bobby's Revenge, keep in mind that this will be a "Simple two key game that might keep you entertain for ten minutes." 

Justin Hey Phil.  Sounds good.  Give me a while to work on the source code and get your sounds downloaded and then I'll get back with ya so we can put it live on both our sites. 
It'll be a BSC/PCS games combined effort game.  Will be cool.  I'll send along a beta copy of the duck game file soon as I get it ready to go. 

Phil Great, I knew you could do it! 
What would you like the game to say in the opening title and end credits? 

Justin How about, "Quacker Blaster, a BSC Games and PCS Games production. 
Copyright 2003 Justin Daubenmire and Phil Vlasak" 
And at the exit, after the duck flies past or whatever, do a voice over with "Thanks for playing Quacker Blaster.  and visit our companies web sites. 
It doesn't matter whose company or name is listed first. 

Phil OK, I think I may have someone who can do the human voice over, but I need to talk to them. 

Justin Thanks Phil! 
I think the human intro and exit will make it hyper-nifty! 
But it may be *a long time* till I get quacker blaster finished up since I am working on 2 games with Igor.  I'm concerned that people will want the game way too quick, and I'm totally pinched for time. 
I.E.  doing 2 games with Igor and having to code a game for the hunter winner. 
Quacker blaster will certainly get done, just depends on when I get that break to finish it up.  Could be a week, a month, or several months. 
People need to know that up front.  smile 

Phil: 
Cool,and I may have the start of a game promo, Quacker Blaster Look, if you had one shot, one opportunity, To blast every duck you ever wanted, Would you download it or just let it slip? 

His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy, There's mosquitoes on his sweater already, his guns steady He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready. 

and by the way, no Ducks were hurt in the production of this game. 
+ Tenpin Alley, the Windows bowling game, is still in development by PCS Games and Josh de Lioncourt, a visually impaired computer programmer and musician. 
Send any comments to: Josh at, eternia@lioncourt.com or to Phil at, phil@pcsgames.net 

+ We are still selling Pacman Talks that plays on computers with Windows 98, ME and XP, and plan on a future update that will fix the foreign keyboard problem. 
It uses the GMA Games engine and has an MSRP of $30 US. 
For more information, and to download the demo, visit the PCS Games web site at http://www.pcsgames.net Pacman Talks is the first PCS game created for Windows. 
You can find out what is in store at PCS Games by joining the PCS games list. 
To subscribe to this discussion list, send a blank message to, PCS_Games-subscribe@yahoogroups.com 

Our mailing address is, PCS Games 666 Orchard Street Temperance, Michigan 48182 phone (734) 850-9502 Call us between the hours of 8:00 A M to 10:00 P M Eastern time, Monday to Saturday. 
E-mail Phil Vlasak, phil@pcsgames.net We make games that tickle your ears. 

+++ 
Play it Again, Sam!: 
Toward a New Understanding of Replay Value 
By Bryan McGucken 
It is commonly accepted that any good game needs as one of its crucial elements a high amount of replay value.  Naturally enough, this factor is one of the most important in reviewing and, for that matter, enjoying a game, and I am in agreement with conventional wisdom.  What, then, is replay value? 
At first glance this may seem like a rather ludicrous question.  Further consideration will reveal, however, that replay value is actually a bit more than what it appears to be.  I believe that most people will adopt the notion that good replay value simply means that a game can be played over and over again, even when it has been completed: all of its puzzles solved and objectives fulfilled.  Many will say that if the same steps are taken each time one plays a game to complete it, then it has very low replay value.  There may be those who shall contest the point, but it is not my place to debate them here.  It is my main contention that, while objectives and puzzles rarely change, except perhaps in the case of games such as Nethack, Ancient Domains of Mystery, and most other role-playing games, nevertheless a game can still be said to have high replay value. 
If this revelation shocks you, you are justified in feeling this way.  After all, what is there to be derived from going through the same routine time and time again?  Consider this, however.  What exactly is a game?  This question is not as simple or as flippant as it seems.  For the purpose of my discussion, a game is the combination of goals and objectives and the environment in which they are found.  It is this environment that makes a game intelligible to the player.  If there is no environment to be found in a game, the goals, few will object, seem pointless and empty.  An environment likewise seems pointless and empty without goals. 
IN the world of accessible games, an environment is, more often than not, built upon what some will call “sound imagery.”  For example, we know that we are in the saloon because of the background noise that we hear when we are in it.  This background noise, both the voice acting with which we interact in the course of playing the four games and the sound of people talking in the background or engaging themselves in goofy antics is what makes the saloon what it is rather than, say, the bank or hotel.  If the sound imagery of which I spoke earlier is composed in such a way that a certain feeling is aroused while in the saloon, then, in a certain sense, our understanding of the way the “world” should be and our reflective aesthetic judgment are in accordance, and a feeling of quasi pleasure ensues.  I use the term quasi pleasure because pleasure is not always the way one ought to feel as in the case of the battle with Murdering’ Sam. 
I have used the example above because I think that the sound imagery used to create the saloon section of “Grizzly Gulch: Western Extravaganza” is so well-constructed that I play the game because I not only want to play the four saloon games, but I actually enjoy listening to the voice acting and background noise that makes the saloon what it is.  Though not fully conscious, a reflective judgment of taste has been passed by me in this case, and in every case.  Bavisoft had the presence of mind not only to use panning and volume to create its environments, but also simply created completely normal background noise without all the proverbial bells and whistles to give the saloon that added sense that it has. 
To avoid this becoming an exposition on “Grizzly Gulch: Western Extravaganza,” the same can be said of “The Savage Gamut” developed by Fantasy Storm (or whichever game strikes your fancy in this regard, for that matter).  Like “Grizzly Gulch: Western Extravaganza,” “The Savage Gamut” immerses the player in a certain environment.  Though not as developed as in the previous example, the sounds you hear in the ring do give the impression of being in a sports arena, from Allen Maynard’s voice to the normal crowd noise to the cheering of the crowd, rife as this last is with the type of reverberation that makes the feeling such a realistic one.  This is why I will give the game such a high replay rating in my review of it later in this issue of Audyssey, even though once one has mastered the moves it takes very little time to complete the game over and over. 
I think the same theory can be applied to graphics in gaming.  For years I played Nintendo games over and over again not just because my family had less than sufficient funding to purchase new ones every month or so, but also because the colour and polygons used in many of the games I played were bright and very sharp, and, as someone with only a limited amount of sight, I found this aspect as gripping as anything else, even though I had completed the objectives scores of times.  I may use the same rules in the case of music, but I shall attempt to do this in a separate article. 
If the preceding arguments do not revolutionize your way of looking at computer games, I do sincerely hope they drastically alter it.  I firmly believe that Michael Feir and I share one voice in asserting that games are all about traveling, if for a short time, to a different world.  Until last fall, I thought it was a sign of how alone I really was that I actually thought games were a portal to other places and situations.  Our illustrious editor has been promoting the ideas expressed in this article in one form or another since he started editing Audyssey seven years ago, and I think that the only way we can really enjoy games and promote them to a wider gamers’ community is if we throw into sharp relief the fact that games are more than a string of linear objectives, and I hope that my article is, if not the first step toward this end, then at least a fairly important one. 

 
+++ Game Announcements and Reviews: Above the full reviews which appear in this section, any new games which have not been fully reviewed yet will be announced in the hopes that readers and/or the Audyssey staff will try out and review these games for us. Reviews of games will not appear in any particular order. The only exception to this will be when we have more than one review for a game. In this case, reviews will be placed consecutively so that it is easier to compare them. As with Anchorhead a few issues back, I may wish to interject my own thoughts on a game should it provoke significant reaction or otherwise prove itself especially noteworthy. When I choose to do this, you'll find my remarks above the review or reviews for the game in question. Should a game have more than one review, two plus-signs will be placed above the first review and/or my remarks. This policy will hopefully encourage people to try both the latest as well as some older games which may have been overlooked. Just because something isn't hot off the presses doesn't mean that it is any less worthy of a gamer's attention. Also, remember that it doesn't matter if a game has been reviewed before. If you have a different take on the game than has already been published, send in your review and I'll consider it for publication. If a review fails to interest you, simply skip to the next plus-sign. It's that simple, folks. 

First up is an announcement from Phil Vlasak of PCS Games. 

Hi Folks, 

Because of the announcement about Harry Hollingsworth in the most recent 
Audyssey magazine, 
I have uploaded two versions of his World Series Baseball Game to my web site. 
One is the full version of the game Harry released in 1989 and includes 
sixteen teams. 
The second is a demo of his 1997 version that includes sound effects. 
Both of these are dos games and would need the dos that came with Windows 
95 or 98. 
I do not recommend the games for people with Windows 2000, ME or XP. 
The games will play better if you also have a hardware voice synthesizer. 
Goto: 
http://www.pcsgames.net 
Then click on the DOS demos link. 

Sincerely, 
Phil 

Phil Vlasak sent along this news which may be of especial interest to parents of younger children: 

Hi Folks, 

The TIM Project is working on Games for the Blind. 
Dominique Archambault and Sébastien Sablé will be giving a talk at the CSUN conference this month. 
The Tactile Interactive Multimedia (TIM) project intends to develop and to adapt children's computer games, making them accessible. 
There are no games available yet, but they are working on these: 
Reader Rabbits, an adaptation of a mainstream discovery game for young children. 
MudSplat, where you squirt water at mud throwing monsters. 
Tim's Journey, where you solve a mystery by exploring a sound environment. 
X-tune, a musical game where you can play with different sounds. 
You can find the project at: 
http://inova.snv.jussieu.fr/tim 

 
Jim Kitchen has been quite a busy fellow over the past quarter. Here are some announcements he has posted concerning his games. To get any or all of them, go to his site at: 
http://www.kitchensinc.net 

 
Hi, 

I have put a new version of my golf game up on my web site.  The 
file name is wingolf5.zip.  The file size is 3.3 meg. 

In this version it now keeps your speech settings, has a text log 
file of how you did on each hole and other text files in the golf 
sub menu. 

I have put two new games for windows up on my web site. 
The games are the board game of life and my hangman game. 
These games use the free Microsoft sapi5 text to speech engine. 
You will find the games under the free windows text to speech link. 

This version of life has an optional computer player and values 
adjusted for inflation. 

This version of hangman besides the 12 thousand word list and the 
over 350 word adult word list allows you to use your own word list. 

If you don't have the sapi5 text to speech engine I have a link to 
the sapi5 section of Robison's site where you can find the correct 
version of sapi5 for your operating system. 

Editor’s note: I’ve lost Jim’s announcement for this, but there’s also a new and improved version of his Pong game on the site. I have found it far more responsive and smooth than the old version. If you haven’t already gotten the update, it’s certainly worth grabbing. 

For all you interactive fiction enthusiasts, a new company is in town. Malinche Entertainment’s first release is an epic fantasy adventure filled with magic and intrigue. Here is some information on Pentari: First Light taken directly from their site at: 
www.malinche.net 

Shattered trust,  murdered innocence and dark pacts have plunged the Kingdom of Pentari in chaos. 
Rogue wizards have captured the city of Delphin and hold kingdom nobles prisoner. They conspire to overthrow the Kingdom itself but they won't stop there. 
 You are sent into the turmoil to strive against unknown foes and dangers as you re-take the city and restore order. 

First Light is a huge game; You have nearly 300 rooms to explore including a city to be searched, an underground complex to explore, as well as monsters 
and wizards to contend with.  The friendly folks you'll meet can be a handful too! 
Pentari: First Light is multi-faceted; this isn't simply a gather-the-treasures and solve-the-puzzles text adventure.  There are nobles to rescue, murder 
to avenge and ultimate evil that can only be confronted in the place of their greatest power. You'll experience a wide range of emotion as you make your 
way in and around Delphin. Some things you'll see will charm you while a few characters may infuriate you.  Not only that, you'll probably be laughing 
a good deal of the time also! 
Executed in the traditions of Infocom, Pentari: First Light utilizes the latest development tools to render an immersive experience that delivers Interactive 
Fiction that reads like a compelling novel but rivets you to the game as you decide what your next move should be. 

Editor’s note: I’m having a tremendous amount of fun with this game and will give it a full review when I’ve gotten somewhat father than I have at present. The game is extremely large and involving and should give starved text adventurers out there a good deal to chew on. Already, Howard Sherman, the self-described implementer is hard at work on the second commercial release from Malinche. This one will excite you horror buffs out there when it’s ready. 

+ 
Talking Maze Game 
Available commercially for $22.95 US from 
http://www.talkingsoftware.gothere.uk.com/ 
Fully playable without sighted assistance 
Reviewed by Michael Feir 

As a company’s first entry into the accessible games market, this product exhibits a good deal of polish. It will doubtless find a welcoming audience particularly among those looking for uncomplicated educational games. It’s about as simple a concept as you can get. Find your way through the mazes in as few moves as possible colliding with as few walls as possible. There are sounds for your footsteps as well as wall collision. Each maze has a par or expected number of collisions. 

A lot of thought has gone into the layout of mazes and their order in the game. Difficulty seems to progress nicely from maze to maze. Instructions are built right into the software and are available with a keystroke. Arrow keys move you through the mazes in the direction they point. You don’t have to think about turning as you do in games like Shades of Doom. 

Being accustomed to far more complexity, randomness and strategy in games, I got bored fairly quickly with Talking Maze. Not being a maze fanatic to begin with doubtless has a lot to do with this. Those who love the challenge of solving mazes will certainly find this in abundance. The trouble is that there isn’t anything to make it more interesting for those less inclined to patiently form a mental map of a maze and solve it. Educators may have a hard time of it keeping kids interested enough to complete the more difficult mazes. To their credit, Talking Software doesn’t pretend that this isn’t the case. What you get is exactly what is advertised with no frills or complications. 

While doing this review, I took a peak at their company information on the site. They have developed an impressive and varied collection of software which is self-voicing as this game is. No screen-reader is required. Although I wasn’t exactly bowled over by their first game, I am hopeful about their future offerings should they decide to develop more games. Richard has certainly demonstrated good programming skills, and Bernadette is a writer and graphic designer. Combining these skills could produce some very good games if they choose to focus the time and effort it takes to develop more complex games. There is certainly room in the market for story-driven entertainment or educational titles. Code Factory has proved that beyond a doubt. I hope we’ll see more from RWF Talking Software in the future. 

++ 
b.o.t.s.2. 
an addictive text-only semi-real-time web-based robot-managing fighting game, 
designed and developed by Rolf 'floR' Raven in DHTML, JavaScript 
and PHP, using vi, notepad and Photoshop. 
Half reviewed by: Sean Randall. 
Don't get confused, folks. It maybe an addictive text-only semi-real-time web-based robot-managing fighting game, and you may wonder what that means? 
I did: and then I decided to read the documentation. 
This game is just that, a game.  But a game of robots and battles unlike any I've played before. 
Quoting from the instructions ... 
"The objective of the game is to train your bot by practicing and ultimately fighting others' bots. This results in experience. This experience can be used 
to advance typical fighting skills. It is your choice on which skill to focus. Another way to excel in battle is your choice of equipment."... 
This basic outline sums up rather well the objective of the game. 
you create a bot (signing up with a nickname, email address and password( and of course a bot name), and then voile, you can start training. 
I haven't had an actual battle yet - that is with a real live person, I have just trained, and improved my stats, and bought something from the showroom. 
So, you ask: when  can I go? 
It isn't as simple as that, I'm afraid. 
Listen to this... 
To ensure you are a living person, instead of a script-using cheater, please type in the number you see in the field below. 

 And the technical concern is, naturally, we don't "see" anything much at all. 
The creator seems to be unhelpful, at a glance, on this point. for he says: 
If that doesn't help, I can't (okay, I won't) help you. There is no way for me to know that you are not a cheater. Don't blame me for having no trust in 
humanity, blame the cheaters. 
The big question now is if he had thought of the blind and vi population at that time or not...  I have emailed him a bout it so don't y'all go bombarding 
him with messages just yet. 
I'm sorry to disappoint you all here and now but there isn't much more I can say without actually playing again.  I can't actually play again because it 
wants me to enter the  numbers and I haven't got sited assistance for at least another nine days as they are all on holiday... 
So here, ladies and gentlemen, is what I will do 
What I will do is this: 
I will keep the blind gamers on the blind gamers list informed. 
But for those of you who happen to be blind gamers and not on the blind gamers list,  you can either: 
Email me at: 
shwatscoff@shwatscoff.fsworld.co.uk 
Or go to 
http://www.shwatscoff.fsworld.co.uk/bots2.txt 
if you get an error message saying the page doesn't exist, then I have know news.  if you get information, well done... If you are reading this months and 
months later and the page isn't there, I think you'll have to resort to having to contact me... 
The game itself is at 
http://www.bots2.net 
and going to: 
http://www.bots2.net/about.html 
will get you to the about page - where you can read the FAQ and all that stuff... 
Well it's been a pleasure not telling you everything I can because I can't play. 
it's my job to tell you when I find a game: it's not my job to  play it for you. 
This is Sean, saying... play bots and prepare to be crushed by my bot!!! I will rule the worrrrrllllddddddd!  ha ha!!! 

+ 
Hunter: 
Available commercially for $30 US from: 
www.bscgames.com 
Fully playable without sighted assistance. 

As usual, I’ll be honest with you. Hunter’s advertisement description found on the BSC Games site left me expecting far more from the game than it ultimately delivered. Advertised as “Hunter is an action packed arcade game with heavy overtones of an adventure/role-play game”, it only truly lives up to the first part of the claim by all but the most loose definition of role-play elements. I was eagerly anticipating a game with an ongoing story truly relevant to the action-based challenges, stats which could be improved, or at least items to be collected which might help in later levels and/or improve your character’s abilities. These would fall under what I would expect from a game with role-play elements. What hunter ends up delivering are ten completely separate mini-games with only your score and the number of lives your character has transferred with you between these mini-games. Once I had gotten over my initial disappointment, I began to enjoy these well-executed mini-games for what they were. 

*Game Play: 

Those who do not read the manual before trying a game should not take such a plunge with Hunter. As I indicated, each level is its own mini-game and has different keys used for controlling your character. Mastering all the keys will take a while unless you take each level individually and only try the whole game once you’ve gone through each of them and have remembered most of the keystrokes. There’s no help or quick method of looking at the manual in between levels. On their own, the controlling keys for each level are well thought out and don’t take long to get the hang of. Players don’t have to worry about getting lost or anything like that. Some levels force players to keep track of more than one element on occasion. For example, the valley of the tigers level has players trying to avoid tigers stampeding through the valley by moving either left or right. Sometimes, a wacky rhino will charge at you and you must leap over it in time. You cannot leap over tigers though. Things seem always to have that similar one solution to one challenge feel. Beginners will doubtless find this lack of complexity appealing. When I have a few spare minutes to kill, that’s when I find myself turning to Hunter. 

*Sounds: 

I’m not certain whether my computer or sound quality are to blame. However, there are times when things seem quite choppy. This is particularly noticeable in the level transition scenes and doesn’t seem to happen much with the actual game sounds. These are, in a word, odd. The sense is not of realism but more of a kind of surreal arcade game. I get the same sense I do when I hear part of a cartoon show from the 1980’s. Justin has clearly taken some pains to make certain that sounds don’t mask each other unless he wants them to. As I said, the mini-games were all well executed. I particularly like the first level in the jungle and the final vine swinging level. There’s nothing which objectively sets these two levels as better than others. They just have the right kind of vibe which smacks of vintage arcade action. The jungle level does have a particularly neat fantasy feel to it. 

*Conclusion: 

If you find yourself with brief periods of spare time where it’s hard to find something fun to do, hunter provides ten stimulating but short options to fill that time. People will doubtless find their favourites in this collection and become masters at these levels. No bugs brought themselves to my attention, and sounds were used quite well overall. 

Those who seek a more involved action adventure like I was originally hoping for from Hunter should definitely look elsewhere. Even after playing all ten levels in a row, I was left feeling more like I had participated in ten completely separate events than that I had gone through an actual adventure. ESP Softworks’s game Monkey Business is a closer example of the kind of game that fulfils Hunter’s description. Credit should be given to Justin for including the Hunter story as an extra item along with the game. That’s a trend I wouldn’t mind seeing more of and plan to incorporate in my own game. Clearly, Justin is still in the process of finding his stride. Each game he has completed has incorporated different elements and has doubtless taught him valuable lessons. The skill with which Hunter’s mini-games were executed along with the writings he has contributed to this issue of Audyssey leaves me quite optimistic about his future projects. He’ll find his true direction soon, and we’ll see some even better games from BSC Games. 

+ 
Decwar 
Online, multiplayer, telnet interfaced and just a little more fun than your singleplayer Star Trek text-based game. 
It is accessible with a few problems.  Being totally blind, I thrive on winning even though I'm at a disadvantage... 
The authors say: 
"I didn't know anyone was still interested in it!" - one of the Authors 
"No, I don't have the source and don't know where to find it!" - The other author 
But despite that, I'm interested in it. You should be too! 
Why? 
1. It is a Star Trek game: we like Star Trek games, yes? 
2. It is multiplayer.  Documentation states that it is able to hold a max of eighteen players but I have only ever played with two.  This game isn't played 
much: can we rectify that, gamers? 
3. It is very accessible.  Limitations include the scan feature which we do have a little difficulty accessing - apart from that we can fire phasers with 
the rest of 'em! 
The game is called Decwar or Decwars or whatever you want to call it. 
It is running on a klh10 operating system or something which I don't understand.  I don't understand it and, furthermore, don't need to. 
Now the reason I don't need to is because I emailed this dude, this guy, this swell person who's letting us play the game.  His name is Harris S. Newman 
 and his website, for all interested parties, is at: 
http://home.austin.rr.com/hsnewman/ 
So how do you play this game? 
well the first thing you must understand is that Decwar was one of the first multiuser games ever written. 
You should also know that 
The game was originally based on a very limited, single job, single terminal, two player Star Trek type game known as WAR. This game came from the CDC-6600/6400. 
I know these things because I have been to the Decwar homepage, which is a helpful thing to do if you want to play - and I will now tell you how to do  
so. 
What you will need 
The things you will need include: 
A screen-reading program - 
A telnet client - 
The ability to use the telnet client and the screen reader in conjunction with each other - 
And a hot cup of coffee as you digest the instructions and complications of the game. 
Having played the game for only about three hours I can safely say that I am not an expert.  Of course that doesn't mean that I can't play the game and, 
startlingly, I destroyed a ship belonging to a friend of mine. 
This friend was slightly less of an expert than me if that is possible and I was able to blow him up with glory! 
 Which I honourably took back to the Klingon empire... 
I am  not going to go into detail on the instructions because the instructions are perfectly capable of going into detail about themselves. 
I will, however, tell you how to log on to the game because that isn't explained very well and I had to have it very well explained to me by the brilliant 
Mr.  Newman. 
So here is what you must do. 
Step perhaps one: 
Go to the Decwar homepage.  I stress that this is a necessary thing to do if you want to learn the instructions and commands.  of course it is optional 
here because when you are at the page and you click to try out the dec 20  emulator (in plane English - launch the game), your telnet program will put 
in an appearance already connected or connecting at least to the server. 
This is a time-consuming process - finding the URL of the page which I haven't given you yet, going to it, finding the link, clicking it... 
so here is - 
Step alternative one. 
Go to start, click run and type: 
telnet Newman.hn.org 2020 
into the box if you are on windows 95, 98, Me, or perhaps Xp which I am not particularly certain about. 
The basic idea is that you connect to the host being 
Newman.hn.org 
and the port being 
2020 
Now thinking on it if you haven't used telnet before you may wish to get in a little experience before engaging your warp drive and trying to use your torpedoes. 
Simply put: this game ain't easy to learn.  it requires an understanding of how to use your computer before you can dive into its mysteries. 
I will pause in my ramblings just here to give you the URL of the Decwar page which if you have read this far you are probably interested in. The URL is: 
http://home.austin.rr.com/hsnewman/decwar.htm 
Instructions and general ideas and the of course necessary login procedure. 
Well after you have connected in either of those ways, proceed to do the following... 
Step two 
In the telnet window, type this: 
log 5,30 
I don't know why, I don't understand what the number 5,30 has to do with anything and I'm happy to not cloud my mind with unnecessary technobable. 
Step three 
After typing that log 5,30 thing, hit enter. You'll get a screen saying: 
Type help for help, news for news, or <Cr> 
it may not use those exact words - or it may.  You can type help if you wish: the <cr>  means a carriage return so just hit enter. 
Finally you will have one of two things happen. 
You will either be asked for a regular or tournament game.  if you are it means nobody else is playing and that nobody else has chosen.  If you proceed 
you will be alone unless you are arriving before somebody you are scheduled to meat. 
The second option is being told that you will join the forces of this, that or the other - being the klingon empire or the federation. 
In either case, you'll join an active game and be in a ship at coordinates. 
Well, that's it. after getting that far your logged in. 
I advise you to read the manual and learn the users command which will tell you who is in existence.  then learn the tell command to tell that person something 
and if it is me, ask for help if you need it. 
Quitting is another concern: procedure is: 
type 
quit 
then choose 
yes 
after reading the stats type 
kjob 
(that is K, J, O, B.) 
Then exit safely (alt f4) or whatever. 
Note that this game is commandline driven, no dialogs or menus.  And also remember that if I see you and you do not respond to my communications or say 
offensive things ... I will not hesitate to unleash my photon torpedoes at you. 
But deadly truths aside I'm happy to help you in as far as I can. I'm only a player too, you know? 
And I'm not helping you  with demands such as: 
'I've just logged in now what'.  Because you'll need to learn some commands first. After you've done that, that's fine.  Send me an intergame message and 
I'm gonna be happy to help.... 
Of course if you really want to  send me an intergame message saying 'you will be destroyed!' and i'll be happy to run 

+ 
More on starfleet: the first era! 
By Sean Randall 

After my initial review and rant in general about Starfleet: the First Era, I did get a lot of feedback. 

Peoples only concern was what they were getting into and they feel I didn’t' give enough general examples and procedure. 

Before I try and atone for that shortcoming, let me just briefly state with st: TFE is for those of you who haven’t read the first thing mentioned above. 

Star trek: the First Era is a collection of starships and starbases where crew (us) send logs, describing our actions which can be anything from walking 
from somewhere to somewhere else to combating an enemy ship. 

I should note that this is a Star Trek thing and that currently we are in the year 2153 in the Star Trek timeline. 

This means that in the context of the new series, Enterprise, the Enterprise herself has been launched about two years ago: this game caps on that and puts 
you in other NX Class ships of the fleet. 

Let’s go over some things that people wanted to know more on now: 

What's a log? 

A log is just an email sent to the starship (usually a yahoo! group): 

In it you become whatever character you are supposed to be. 

I'll back this up with an example: 

This is part of a log: sent by a regular person - but playing a Chief of the Boat and exo-biologist in the game. Current story in brief: 

Starfleet Officers are on earth undercover hitching a ride to Washington: the Chief of the Boat (COB) writes: 

David pulled into the gas station and the group filed out of the 

Van, into the sunny, rather hot day. Everyone was stretching their 

legs. Donavan signalled that he'd pay for gas this time. 

Donavan felt they were making excellent time, while stopping two 

other times for gas. He gathered Shwatscoff & Ponary together, 

"See if you can find a radio...hopefully it'll be on the news. See if 

anything's changed in the timeline. Here, give me your canteen, 

I'll refill it." He motioned to Shwatscoff. 

While the two officers when to do their thing, Donavan went into 

the gas station. To his surprise, there was a deli inside. He 

ordered sandwiches and bottles of coke for everyone. 

- - - 

After he sent that log out, the rest of the away team would respond in turn: The Doctor, for example, with this writes: 

As he reappeared he noticed the team wandering through the small 

store. Donavan seemed to be buying food for the group, which was an 

added bonus as breakfast was definitely a long time ago. Thankfully 

no one had asked him about his accent yet. He had gotten a few odd 

looks, but that was the worst. The Vulcan was the one that stuck out 

the most. He chucked to himself as he remembered the Donavan had 

explained he was from Canada. 

He followed the rest of the group back to the van and then helped 

Donavan and Naran hand out drinks and sandwiches. He took a bite of 

his food as he listened to Shwatscoff talk. So things were quickly 

going from bad to worse... wonderful... He did a little bit of 

mental calculations. They were in New Jersy now... which was a lot 

closer to Washington then they had been. Hopefully they'd be in 

Washington by nightfall tonight. He looked around at the sober faces 

of the crew and wondered if they were all thinking what he was, what 

if they were to late? 

- - - 

I purposely left the spelling and grammar mistakes in there this time just to show you that not everybody is perfect. 

So these logs get piled on and on and on and a story comes out of it all.  This mission here Donavan, the COB, is in charge.  He received his orders from 
the Captain of the ship - who's still there while the away team is on earth. 

But that is basically how you rp (roll play) here. 

By requirements, you are obliged to send in a max of 1 log per week on a generally quiet mission, and sometimes 2 or 3 on a big one or in the Jupiter Academy 
which all applicants go through. 

All you need is to be creative, to be able to read and write English, and to have an email address. 

Joining up and what to do after that 

When people talk to me about joining the first era their biggest complaint is "I have the time, sure.  But it's all this business of joining up in the first 
place that takes for ever." 

The basic theory behind joining is: 

1.  Go to a website and fill in a form. 

2.   Wait for a responding email. 

3.  Confirm it. 

4.  Send your first log to the Jupiter Station Facility, sort of Starfleet academy for us in this age. 

5. Read the sim guide and answer the ten questions on it (you will receive both via email). 

6.  Log a couple times following the storyline your commander has set out: note that this will be told to you: what to log about, who to talk to, and what 
to do. 

The only thing to fear in a star trek game is the borg, is a common analogy I hear. 

And after you've logged and completed the mission at Jupiter station (Js) you will be sent on to your ship, whatever you chose. 

the website for Starfleet: the First Era in general is at 

http://members.shaw.ca/starfleet-thefirstera/index2.htm 

There you can either join, view what ships are joinable, see vacancies for the various ships (positions available), and just generally read up on things. 

I will say know more now, and hope that you join up: intership communication is fine, but between ship chit-chat is not often done. 

Still, I’m contactable if you are either on the Intrepid as I am, or on another starship somewhere in the universe and want to do a sub-space communication 
with me, people do that sort of thing to catch up on gossip and just talk about the fleet, the mission, etc. 

And now I'll say good by, Live long and prosper: I leave you with a news report from Jim collens of the Sol news network. 

- - - 

The Intrepid was called into battle after having a nasty encounter with a Naucasian battle group at a mining colony.  The Intrepid soon entered the Sol 

system before it encountered the Suliban ship. 

They exchanged fire but to a surprise, the already battle damaged Intrepid lost helm control and slid to a temporal displacement cloud as scientists are 

now saying.  Soon fire was exchanged again, and communication being soon lost with the Intrepid. 

"What ever it was, it did take the Suliban ship with them.  We hope they are still alive and well, the rest of the earth is thankful for their efforts to 

protect our way of life" Commodore Star stated today at a press conference VIA Commnet. 

Jim Collons 

Sol News Network 

Starfleet Command, Earth 

+ 
Dynaman 
Game available commercially for $24.95 from 
www.espsoftworks.com 
Fully playable without sighted assistance 
Reviewed by Michael Feir 

Although its premise and rules are simple, this game packs a lot of action and replay value. It also makes excellent use of quadraphonic sound if the player uses quadraphonic headphones or has a suitable speaker setup such as the 4.1 surround sound speakers I have. It also works just fine with a more common two-speaker setup. It is a non-violent game suitable for all ages, and is also one of the few accessible games which go on infinitely as long as the player is skilled enough to survive. 

*Game Play: 

The basic concept is something like Pacman. Run around three grid levels stacked on top of each other collecting all of the electrons. Preventing you from doing this are four sparks which can kill you. Each corner of each grid level has a capacitor which can give Dynaman a charge which gives protection against one impact with a spark. Besides sparks, Dynaman must be careful of broken circuits which are lethal obstacles unless a coil of wire is being carried which will fix the circuit. Warps allow Dynaman to transport between levels and also do the same for coils and sparks  

I’ve always had a tendency to want more elements in games that I play. There are always one or two things which I’m left thinking should have been present but weren’t. Dynaman is no exception, although I should stress that it works very well with the elements it now has present. Nothing is really missing from the game. Each obstacle has a means of dealing successfully with it and one isn’t left feeling that things are unfairly stacked against Dynaman. Unlike Pacman’s power pills which are gone for good once they’re eaten, capacitors recharge and can be re-used after a brief while. You’re never left without a means of defending yourself from the sparks. However, I’ve had situations where a broken circuit blocked me and there were no coils around to fix it with. 

So then, what would I have added? For one thing, it would have been good if something required the player to think about all three grids at once. The centre of each grid has a navigational beacon sound, but I’ve often thought that there should be something in the centre such as a switch which could be thrown. Each switch on each grid would have to be hit in a correct sequence to award bonus points or do something else. Another idea might be to have bonus items appear for brief periods on a randomly chosen level. Finally, I’ve run into situations where I was confronted and/or trapped by multiple sparks. The one charge from the capacitor would eliminate a spark only to leave me defenceless against the other spark and/or two sparks close enough not to be able to escape from. A bonus weapon which would, for instance, neutralize all sparks ahead of Dynaman might have been nice as long as it was only rarely obtainable and/or cost points to use. Being able to earn additional lives would also have been nice. 

Like I said before though, the game is quite nifty as it is. I’ve been drawn into playing lengthy games of it quite often despite its repetitive nature. The hard level is particularly fun with the sparks hunting you down aggressively and the coils much harder to obtain. Also, the variable speed control adds a lot to one’s ability to customize the game’s difficulty. 

*The Interface: 

You can’t get much more simple or intuitive than how Dynaman’s interface is laid out. The arrow keys control Dynaman’s movement with the up arrow starting him moving ahead, the left and right arrows turning him 90 degrees in their respective directions, and the down arrow reversing Dynaman’s direction. The “p” key will pause the action. Going up and down warps requires holding down the right control key and using the up or down arrows. Menus are easy as pie with the usual up or down arrows moving between options and enter key selecting them. To get a sense of where things are on the grid you’re on, the home key causes the grid to be scanned row by row with each row panning left to right in descending order. Every item has an identifying sound such as “yum” for electrons remaining and a spring sound for the coil. The scan will not reveal the location of the sparks though, and I think that’s a good thing. 

*Sound: 

As I indicated earlier, the game makes use of quadraphonic sound in quite a spectacular way. The overall atmosphere is very much like that of the movie Tron. In fact, I recognised one of the sounds from the movie. Each grid in the stack of three has its own background sound which prevents confusion as to which grid Dynaman is on. The sparks make an appropriate electrical zapping noise as they move towards you. You can also hear the coil and sparks warping between levels and whether they warp up or downward. Short circuits make an alarm sound. All sounds move relative to your position so that you can hear things happen off to the left or right. If you use quadraphonic sound, you also hear things behind you which is very nifty indeed. Sound-wise I can’t think of a single thing to find fault with. You even get a choice of whether you want the upcoming passage indicators to pan in the direction of the openings from the centre outwards like arrows, or whether you want them to be all the way over in the left or right. You can also choose whether or not you want Dynaman to make a sound as he turns in a given direction. Not bad at all. 

*conclusion: 

Even as I’m writing this review, Dynaman is being improved again by James North. The next version of it will have a level editor letting people make their own grids for Dynaman to play on. I have no idea what other improvements, if any, will be added. Only one bug in the game drew itself forcefully to my attention. The bonus level map can’t be accessed by the game due to an error in where the game thinks it is. James has indicated how to fix this, and it will doubtless be rectified in the new version. It’s a simple matter of copying the bonus.map file into the game’s main folder. Other than this, the game had no other errors that I’ve detected. It’s elegantly straight-forward and right up there in entertainment value with ESP Softworks’s other games. The game editor will add even more re-play value to a game which already has plenty of it making it well worth the price. 

Despite the differences, I would have to say that Dynaman gives blind players more of a feel for what playing Pacman is like due to how things are presented sonically. I can get a better overall sense of my surroundings and where game elements are. As usual, James has given us a game which doesn’t leave you feeling that things have been simplified for blind people or because only so much can be communicated to the player via sound. I give Dynaman  a full ten out of ten, particularly since it will soon include the level editor. Although I might personally think it could have used a bit more complexity, I still find it a very satisfying game to play as is. 
+ 
The Savage Gamut 
Game reviewed by Bryan McGucken 
Available for Download or on CD for $8 
Developed by Fantasy Storm: 
www.fantasystorm.net 
Fully playable without sighted assistance 
Life has a funny way of throwing the strangest ironies in one’s direction.  Around the beginning of March (a Sunday, to be precise), I was ambling about my parents’ house here in Portland, Connecticut, thinking about what it would be like to develop a boxing computer game that blind computer users could play without sighted assistance.  I thought of how great it would be to make a game based on the popular Nintendo game Punch-out.  As seems to be the case so often these days, I got beat to the punch yet again.  As if I really want to dignify your unasked question with an answer:  Yes, the pun was most definitely intended!  Insert chuckle here.  Allen Maynard, Senior Programmer and Chief Executive Officer of Fantasy Storm, has delivered for us all a boxing game to rival the best of them. 
The Savage Gamut and its sequel, The Savage Gamut Redemption, deliver perhaps the most realistic boxing simulation for not only the blind, but maybe the sighted as well.  Your opponents can deliver hooks to the head or midsection, and to your left or right, and jabs to the head or midsection, again to your left or right.  Additionally, your opponent can throw an uppercut at you.  If you stop and think carefully about this, you have nine moves to memorize and evade!  While you cannot actually move your character, named Dane (or Dangerous if you play the sequel), I would have to say this is about as close to real boxing as you can get.  There is a different key combination to learn to avoid each move. 
As if that were not enough, you must plan your counterattack as well!  Unfortunately, you cannot hook your opponent, but you can jab or uppercut him.  For example, if Congo throws a right head hook, you must dodge it and counter with a low right jab.  Not even a low left jab will be successful when counterattacking your opponent (he will just evade it by blocking or moving away from it). 
Based on this information, I would say that the game has a very high learning curve, but I do not think this is an accident.  Rather it is an asset!  Allen has taking great pains to program the game so that it works just right and so that no one can fudge their way through a match, which can consist of twelve real-time rounds of one to three minutes inclusive.  Oh, and by the way, I would not suggest trying to dance your way out of a match by avoiding all of your opponents punches in the original game, because you will automatically lose the fight if twelve rounds transpire without your opponent getting knocked out.  Allen made the sequel such that you automatically win if you survive twelve rounds without being knocked out, but it almost takes luck to do this, especially against the final challenger! 
You have the option to save your game between fights, and novices should probably take advantage of this feature, because if you lose a fight you drop back two levels.  A level is simply which bout out of nine (or eight in the sequel you are currently playing).  As for sound, it is a bit repetitive, but realistic nonetheless, which is why I still play it, even having completed both versions of the game some time ago.  Another nice touch is that a sound effect plays in addition to Allen speaking each option as you move to it.  As for music, the background music at the title and options screens is the same and somewhat repetitive, but this is not a big issue for me.  Also, though it is quite obvious the music that plays when you secure the championship (or retain it in the case of the sequel) was programmed using a keyboard, nevertheless it is a nice touch, and actually a decent rendition of the immensely popular song “We are the Champions” by British rock sensation Queen. 
The only drawback, if one can call it that, is that, while playing the game, I noticed that in the sequel version a round would start, followed by its immediate conclusion without any time expiring.  I inquired into its meaning, and it turned out that the clock was not being reset for each round once a game had been restored.  When a saved game is restored, the amount of time for each round that was selected initially is loaded into the game’s memory.  Allen was, however, gracious and programmed a time patch executable, which is available for download at his company Web site, which is: 
www.fantasystorm.net. 
Fear not: the download is only 288 kilobytes (you have two or three extra minutes to spare, don’t you)?  Novice players should start with the original game to familiarize themselves with the controls.  This is a good training tool because the boxers are fairly easy to knockout and do not move very fast, allowing the new player to plan her moves.  In the sequel, contrariwise, the boxers move much more quickly, are much harder to knock out, and hit harder.  In fact, in the eighth and championship bout of The Savage Gamut Redemption, one punch from Core will send Dangerous sprawling to the mat, likely for a ten-count.  Those looking for a true challenge are encouraged to try this version (it took me three weeks) to complete the version, including two weeks to defeat Core).  Also, try completing the sequel without saving your game at all.  Can you get through all eight bouts without doing so? 
All in all, I would rate this game at 9 out of 10.  The sound environment is well-crafted, the game interface is a challenge to learn, and the game will even appeal to folks like me who do not follow the actual sport in real life.  So, ya think you’re pretty hot stuff, do ya?  Huh?  Well, wanna make somethin’ of it? 

+++ 
Contacting Us 

I can be reached in two ways. The easiest is via my Cogeco E-mail address. 
My e-mail address is as follows: 
mfeir@cogeco.ca 
Alternatively, you may correspond with me on 3.5-inch disks, 
provided you be sure to send them in returnable disk-mailers. I don't have the money to pay for postage. My mailing address is: 
350 Lynnwood Drive 
Apartment 103 
Oakville, Ontario 
L6H 1M8 

Adam Taylor, star of Adam, The Immortal Gamer, and our resident ADOM guru, can be reached three ways. You can send him e-mail at: 
Lord.blade@home.com 
Or, you can check out his homepage on the web: 
Blade's Armoury 
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arcade/9111 
His page is dedicated to providing help, cheats and solutions to many games. Send him a request, and he'll do his best to find what you need. He also has sections on ADOM and Nethack available. Also, 
you can download the magazine from his page. 
Finally, if you wish to contact him at home, his address is: 3082 
Bartholomew Crescent 
Mississauga, Ontario 
Canada L5N 3L1 

Jay Pellis is an avid fan of graphical adventures and console games. For those of you wondering which Sega or Nintendo games are at all enjoyable to the blind, he's the one to turn to. He can be contacted at: 
jalucard@icontech.com 

Kelly Sapergia is our expert in interactive fiction. He is a 
well-established reviewer of games for Audyssey, and has an 
interest in developing interactive fiction as well as playing it. 
He can be contacted at: 
kjsman2@sk.sympatico.ca 

Luis Defute and Stann Bobbitt are in charge of the official Audyssey homepage. They can be contacted at: 
webmaster@audysseymagazine.org 
and 
stanbobbitt@hotmail.com 

David Lant has long been an active member of the Audyssey community. He is now one of our two moderators keeping things pleasant and orderly on the Audyssey discussion list. He can be contacted at: 
DLant@btinternet.com 

Brenda Green is the co moderator. Her efforts on behalf of the Audyssey community are very much appreciated. She can be contacted at: 
bdgreen@tru.eastlink.ca 

Paul Nimmo is a long-time resident of the Audyssey community who maintains a Frequently Asked Questions or faq file for Audyssey. When it is updated, it gets posted to a number of sites. He can be contacted at: 
pgnimmo@bigpond.net.au